Beyerdynamic Amiron 200
Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus

Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus

Common Features

  • Both products have open-ear fit.
  • Both products are wireless.
  • Both products include wingtips.
  • Both products have stereo speakers.
  • Both products have a rechargeable battery.
  • Both products have a battery level indicator.
  • Both products support fast charging.
  • Both products have a mute function.
  • Both products can be used as a headset.
  • Both products have a control panel placed on a device.
  • Both products have voice prompts.
  • Both products have a noise-canceling microphone.
  • Both products have a frequency range from 20 Hz to 20000 Hz.
  • Both products do not support spatial audio.
  • Both products do not support Dolby Atmos.
  • Both products do not support Dirac Virtuo.
  • Both products do not have RGB lighting.
  • Both products do not have a display.
  • Both products do not have UV light.

Main Differences

  • Ingress Protection (IP) rating is IP54 on Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and IP55 on Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus.
  • Water resistance is sweat resistant on Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and water resistant on Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus.
  • Weight is 20.4 g on Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and 18.8 g on Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus.
  • Battery life of the charging case is 25 hours on Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and 37 hours on Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus.
  • Charge time is 1.5 hours on Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and 2 hours on Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus.
  • Wireless charging is not available on Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 but is available on Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus.
  • Maximum Bluetooth range is 15 m on Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and 10 m on Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus.
  • AAC support is available on Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 but not on Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus.
Specs Comparison
Beyerdynamic Amiron 200

Beyerdynamic Amiron 200

Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus

Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus

Design:
Fit Open-ear Open-ear
Ingress Protection (IP) rating IP54 IP55
water resistance Sweat resistant Water resistant
weight 20.4 g 18.8 g
has no wires or cables
are neckband earbuds
wingtips included
has RGB lighting
has stereo speakers
has UV light
Has a display

Both the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus feature an open-ear design, offering a similar style of fit. The Amiron 200 weighs 20.4 g, while the OpenFit 2 Plus is slightly lighter at 18.8 g. Both are wireless, with no wires or cables, and neither uses a neckband design. Additionally, both models include wingtips, ensuring a secure fit during use.

In terms of ingress protection, the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 has an IP54 rating, making it sweat-resistant. On the other hand, the Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus has a slightly higher IP55 rating, which means it is water-resistant. This makes the Shokz model more resilient against water exposure compared to the Amiron 200.

Neither model includes RGB lighting, UV light, or a display. Both feature stereo speakers for immersive sound but lack any additional visual or display features.

Sound quality:
has active noise cancellation (ANC)
has passive noise reduction
lowest frequency 20 Hz 20 Hz
highest frequency 20000 Hz 20000 Hz
supports spatial audio
has Dolby Atmos
has Dirac Virtuo
has a neodymium magnet

Both the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus share identical specifications when it comes to sound quality. Neither model features active noise cancellation (ANC) or passive noise reduction. Both headphones have a frequency range spanning from 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, ensuring a wide range of audio playback. Additionally, neither model supports spatial audio, Dolby Atmos, nor Dirac Virtuo. Both also lack a neodymium magnet for enhanced sound fidelity.

With all the sound-related specs being the same for both products, there are no notable differences between them in terms of the features they provide for audio quality.

Overall, users can expect a similar audio performance from both the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus, with neither offering advanced sound technologies like ANC, spatial audio, or specialized audio enhancements.

Power:
Battery life 11 hours 11 hours
Battery life of charging case 25 hours 37 hours
charge time 1.5 hours 2 hours
has wireless charging
Has a solar power battery
has a battery level indicator
has a rechargeable battery

When comparing the battery performance of the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus, both offer a battery life of 11 hours for continuous use. However, the Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus has a significantly longer battery life for its charging case, providing up to 37 hours, compared to the 25 hours offered by the Amiron 200's case.

In terms of charging time, the Amiron 200 charges in 1.5 hours, while the OpenFit 2 Plus takes slightly longer at 2 hours. Additionally, the OpenFit 2 Plus supports wireless charging, a feature not available on the Amiron 200, which lacks wireless charging capability.

Both products have a battery level indicator and feature rechargeable batteries, ensuring convenient monitoring and recharging. Neither product has a solar power battery.

Connectivity:
has fast pairing
Has USB Type-C
has LDAC
has LDHC
has Bluetooth LE Audio
has aptX Adaptive
has aptX Low Latency
has aptX HD
has aptX
has aptX Lossless
has aptX Voice
has Auracast
maximum Bluetooth range 15 m 10 m
supports Bluetooth pairing using NFC
Can be used wirelessly
has AAC

The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus share many connectivity features, but there are some key differences. Both models include USB Type-C for charging, but the Amiron 200 supports AAC, while the OpenFit 2 Plus does not. Neither product has support for fast pairing, Bluetooth LE Audio, or any aptX codecs, including aptX Adaptive, aptX Low Latency, aptX HD, aptX, aptX Lossless, or aptX Voice. Both products also lack Auracast support.

In terms of Bluetooth range, the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 offers a maximum range of 15 meters, whereas the Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus has a shorter range of 10 meters. Neither model supports Bluetooth pairing via NFC.

Both headphones can be used wirelessly, but the Amiron 200 provides an extra advantage with AAC support, which is absent in the OpenFit 2 Plus.

Features:
release date September 2025 October 2025
has ambient sound mode
Supports fast charging
can read notifications
Has a built-in translator
has a mute function
can be used as a headset
control panel placed on a device
Has voice prompts
travel bag is included
Has an in-line control panel
Has a temperature sensor
Has a built-in camera remote control function

The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus offer similar features, with both products lacking ambient sound mode and built-in translators. Both support fast charging and include a mute function. Additionally, both can be used as a headset and have a control panel placed on the device. Voice prompts are also available on both models, and a travel bag is included in the package. Neither model has an in-line control panel, a temperature sensor, nor a built-in camera remote control function.

In terms of features, the two products are virtually identical, offering the same set of capabilities across the board. There are no significant differences in the features between the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus.

Microphone:
has a noise-canceling microphone

Both the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus feature a noise-canceling microphone. This ensures that both products can deliver clearer communication by minimizing background noise during use.

With identical microphone features, users can expect similar performance in terms of voice clarity and noise reduction when using either the Amiron 200 or OpenFit 2 Plus.

Comparison Summary

This is a specification comparison between Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus. Both products feature an open-ear fit, are wireless, and include wingtips and stereo speakers. They also support a rechargeable battery with a battery level indicator, a mute function, and voice prompts. However, the Ingress Protection (IP) rating is IP54 on the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and IP55 on the Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus, with the latter being water resistant and the former only sweat resistant. The weight is 20.4 g on the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and 18.8 g on the Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus. The maximum Bluetooth range is 15 m on the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and 10 m on the Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus, while the Shokz OpenFit 2 Plus supports wireless charging, unlike the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200.