Blackview Oscal Marine 2 VS Ulefone Armor 34

The Blackview Oscal Marine 2 and the Ulefone Armor 34 both offer waterproofing with an IP68 rating, ensuring resistance to dust and water, but beyond that, their designs diverge significantly.

In terms of size, the Oscal Marine 2 is lighter and more compact, weighing 395 g with dimensions of 179.8 mm in height, 83.1 mm in width, and 18.3 mm in thickness. On the other hand, the Ulefone Armor 34 is notably heavier at 673 g and larger, with a height of 181.3 mm, width of 86.6 mm, and thickness of 32.7 mm.

The volume of the Blackview Oscal Marine 2 is 273.4 cm³, while the Ulefone Armor 34 has a larger volume of 513.4 cm³. Additionally, the Armor 34 is explicitly described as having a rugged build, whereas the Oscal Marine 2 does not feature such a design. Both phones are not foldable, making them rigid in form.

The Blackview Oscal Marine 2 and the Ulefone Armor 34 differ significantly in their display technology and specifications. The Oscal Marine 2 features an LCD IPS display with a screen size of 6.56″, a pixel density of 269 ppi, and a resolution of 720 x 1612 px. In contrast, the Armor 34 uses an OLED/AMOLED display that is larger at 6.95″, with a higher pixel density of 387 ppi and a resolution of 1080 x 2460 px.

While both phones support touch input, the Oscal Marine 2 has a refresh rate of 90Hz, whereas the Armor 34 supports a smoother 144Hz refresh rate. The Oscal Marine 2 also has branded damage-resistant glass, while the Armor 34 does not.

Neither device supports HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, or features an Always-On Display, and neither has a secondary screen. These aspects are identical for both models, leaving the main differences to be the display technology, size, resolution, and refresh rate.

The Blackview Oscal Marine 2 and the Ulefone Armor 34 offer significant differences in terms of performance specifications. The Oscal Marine 2 is equipped with 256GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, powered by the Unisoc T615 chipset, with a Mali G57 GPU. Its CPU features 2 cores running at 1.8 GHz and 6 cores at 1.6 GHz, and it has a Geekbench 6 multi-core score of 1461 and a single-core score of 437. In contrast, the Armor 34 boasts a larger 512GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, using the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 chipset with a Mali G615 MC2 GPU. Its CPU runs at a faster speed of 2.5 GHz for 4 cores and 2 GHz for 4 cores, and it achieves a Geekbench 6 multi-core score of 2932 and a single-core score of 1026.

Looking at the GPU, the Armor 34 has a higher clock speed of 1047 MHz, compared to the Oscal Marine 2’s 850 MHz. The RAM speed of the Armor 34 is also notably higher, at 6400 MHz, while the Oscal Marine 2 has a RAM speed of 1866 MHz. Both devices feature integrated LTE, integrated graphics, and support for 64-bit processing, along with big.LITTLE technology and 8 CPU threads.

In terms of memory capabilities, the Oscal Marine 2 can support up to 12GB of RAM, while the Armor 34 can handle up to 16GB. The semiconductor size of the Oscal Marine 2 is 12 nm, while the Armor 34 is built on a more advanced 4 nm process. The DDR memory version is 4 for the Oscal Marine 2, and 5 for the Armor 34, reflecting newer memory technology in the latter.

The Blackview Oscal Marine 2 and the Ulefone Armor 34 have notable differences in their camera setups. The Oscal Marine 2 features a 16 MP main camera and an 8 MP front camera. It has a single LED flash and a CMOS sensor but lacks optical image stabilization, BSI sensor, or HDR10 recording. Its main camera can record video at 1080 x 30 fps and supports features like phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus during movie recording, and manual settings for exposure, ISO, and focus.

In contrast, the Armor 34 boasts a much more advanced main camera setup with three lenses: 64 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP, along with a 32 MP front camera. It uses a dual-tone LED flash with two LEDs. Like the Oscal Marine 2, the Armor 34 lacks optical image stabilization and a BSI sensor but also includes a CMOS sensor. The main camera can record video at 2160 x 30 fps and shares similar manual control features, including manual exposure, ISO, and focus. However, it does not support slow-motion video recording, unlike the Oscal Marine 2.

Both devices support in-camera panoramas and touch autofocus, and neither supports 3D photo/video recording, HDR10 recording, Dolby Vision recording, or a front-facing camera under the display. The front camera on both phones also lacks an LED flash. Overall, the Ulefone Armor 34 offers a more versatile and higher-resolution camera system, with more lenses and a significantly higher megapixel count compared to the Blackview Oscal Marine 2.

Both the Blackview Oscal Marine 2 and the Ulefone Armor 34 run Android 15, offering a similar set of features in their operating systems. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and support for theme customization. They also share functionality like blocking app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, and the ability to play games while they download.

Features like dark mode, battery health check, extra dim mode, dynamic theming, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, and split-screen support are available on both devices. Neither device offers Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, or direct OS updates, and both lack the ability to be used as a PC.

Both the Oscal Marine 2 and the Armor 34 support PiP (Picture-in-Picture), sharing intents, a child lock, widgets, offline voice recognition, voice commands, device tracking, and multi-user system capabilities. However, the Quick Start feature is not available on either device, and neither supports Mail Privacy Protection or blocks cross-site tracking.

The Blackview Oscal Marine 2 and the Ulefone Armor 34 both come with large batteries, but they differ greatly in capacity. The Oscal Marine 2 features an 11,000 mAh battery, while the Armor 34 has a much larger 25,500 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, but the charging speed differs: the Oscal Marine 2 supports 18W charging, while the Armor 34 supports a faster 66W charging speed.

Both phones come with a charger in the box and have a rechargeable, non-removable battery. Additionally, both devices feature a battery level indicator, allowing users to easily monitor their battery status.

Neither device supports wireless charging, and neither has a removable battery. Overall, while both phones are equipped with powerful batteries, the Ulefone Armor 34 stands out with its larger battery capacity and faster charging capabilities.

The Blackview Oscal Marine 2 and the Ulefone Armor 34 differ in their audio features. The Oscal Marine 2 does not have a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack and lacks stereo speakers, aptX, LDAC, or any other advanced Bluetooth audio technologies like aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, and aptX Lossless. It also does not have a radio.

In contrast, the Ulefone Armor 34 includes a 3.5 mm audio jack, allowing for wired audio connections. Like the Oscal Marine 2, it does not feature stereo speakers or any of the advanced Bluetooth audio codecs like aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. However, the Armor 34 does include a radio, which the Oscal Marine 2 does not.

Overall, the main difference is that the Armor 34 offers a 3.5 mm audio jack and a radio, while the Oscal Marine 2 lacks these features entirely.

The Blackview Oscal Marine 2 and the Ulefone Armor 34 offer a wide range of connectivity features, with some notable differences. The Oscal Marine 2 does not support 5G, while the Armor 34 does. Both devices support dual SIM cards and feature an external memory slot, USB Type-C, and NFC. However, the Wi-Fi capabilities differ: the Oscal Marine 2 supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), whereas the Armor 34 also includes Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), offering faster and more efficient Wi-Fi connectivity.

In terms of network speeds, the Oscal Marine 2 has a download speed of 300 MBit/s and an upload speed of 150 MBit/s, while the Armor 34 significantly outperforms with a download and upload speed of 3270 MBit/s. Both devices have a fingerprint scanner, GPS, a compass, a gyroscope, an accelerometer, and a cellular module. The Armor 34 also includes a barometer, an infrared sensor, and a built-in projector, which are not available on the Oscal Marine 2.

Both devices have support for Galileo, but the Oscal Marine 2 lacks some additional features found on the Armor 34, such as an infrared sensor, barometer, and projector. Additionally, neither device includes an HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, or a stylus.

Both the Blackview Oscal Marine 2 and the Ulefone Armor 34 feature a video light, but neither comes with sapphire glass, a curved display, or an e-paper display.

The specifications for these features are identical between the two devices, as both phones lack sapphire glass and a curved or e-paper display, focusing instead on standard display options. The inclusion of a video light, however, adds a useful feature for low-light video recording in both models.

In summary, the only common feature in this category for both phones is the video light, with no differences between them regarding display type or advanced glass protection.