Blackview Xplore 2 5G VS Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal

The Blackview Xplore 2 5G and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal are both rugged devices with similar water resistance capabilities. Both are waterproof and have a water resistance depth rating of 1.5 meters. The Xplore 2 has an IP69 rating, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal has a slightly lower IP68 rating. The IP69 rating of the Xplore 2 indicates it is more resistant to high-pressure water jets compared to the IP68 rating of the Armor 29 Pro Thermal, which is resistant to submersion but not as resistant to intense water pressure.

In terms of size and weight, the Blackview Xplore 2 5G weighs 670 g and has dimensions of 87.8 mm in width, 186 mm in height, and 29 mm in thickness. The Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal is slightly heavier at 688 g, with dimensions of 85.6 mm in width, 177.4 mm in height, and 33.8 mm in thickness. The Armor 29 Pro Thermal has a larger volume at 513.27 cm³ compared to the Xplore 2’s 473.59 cm³. The Xplore 2 is slightly slimmer and lighter, but the Armor 29 Pro Thermal has a larger physical volume overall.

Both devices have a rugged build and cannot be folded, ensuring durability for outdoor use. While both are designed for tough environments, the slightly higher weight and volume of the Armor 29 Pro Thermal might make it less compact compared to the Xplore 2, which is more lightweight and slim.

Both the Blackview Xplore 2 5G and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal feature OLED/AMOLED displays, which offer vibrant colors and high contrast. However, the Xplore 2 has a slightly larger screen size at 6.73 inches, compared to the Armor 29 Pro Thermal’s 6.67 inches. In terms of pixel density, the Xplore 2 again takes the lead with 521 ppi, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal has a lower pixel density of 395 ppi. This means the Xplore 2 likely provides sharper visuals.

The resolution of the Blackview Xplore 2 is also higher, with a 1440 x 3200 px resolution, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal offers a 1080 x 2400 px resolution. Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and gaming experiences. Neither device supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision, so both displays offer similar capabilities in that regard.

Both devices are equipped with branded damage-resistant glass, but the Xplore 2 uses Gorilla Glass 5, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal has Gorilla Glass 3, indicating that the Xplore 2’s glass is a more advanced version. Additionally, the Xplore 2 does not have a secondary screen, whereas the Armor 29 Pro Thermal includes a secondary screen, which could offer added functionality for certain tasks.

The Blackview Xplore 2 5G and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal are both equipped with MediaTek chipsets, but they differ in their specific models. The Xplore 2 features the MediaTek Dimensity 8300, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7400. The Xplore 2’s chipset operates with a CPU configuration of 1 x 3.35 GHz, 3 x 3 GHz, and 4 x 2.2 GHz, whereas the Armor 29 Pro Thermal's CPU runs at 4 x 2.6 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz. Both devices use big.LITTLE technology and have 8 CPU threads, but the Xplore 2’s higher clock speeds suggest it may have an edge in raw CPU performance.

In terms of RAM, both devices come with 16GB, but the Xplore 2 has a faster RAM speed of 8533 MHz compared to the Armor 29 Pro Thermal's 6400 MHz. This difference in RAM speed could contribute to the Xplore 2 offering quicker memory access and potentially better multitasking performance. The Xplore 2 also supports a maximum memory bandwidth of 68.2 GB/s, significantly higher than the 25.6 GB/s supported by the Armor 29 Pro Thermal.

The Xplore 2 also has a more substantial internal storage capacity, with 1024GB, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal offers 512GB of internal storage. The Xplore 2 supports a maximum memory amount of 24GB, doubling the maximum supported by the Armor 29 Pro Thermal, which is limited to 16GB. Both devices use DDR5 memory and support 64-bit processing, with both having integrated graphics via the Mali G615 series GPU, though the Xplore 2 has a more powerful version (G615 MP6) compared to the G615 MC2 in the Armor 29 Pro Thermal, along with a higher GPU clock speed of 1400 MHz versus 1047 MHz in the Armor 29 Pro Thermal.

The Blackview Xplore 2 5G and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal both feature multi-lens main cameras with similar front cameras. The Xplore 2 has a main camera setup of 50 MP, 50 MP, and 20 MP, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal offers 64 MP, 50 MP, and 50 MP. Both devices include a 50 MP front camera, but there are differences in their flash configurations: the Xplore 2 has a dual-tone LED flash with 2 LEDs, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal uses a dual-tone LED flash with 4 LEDs, potentially offering a brighter light for low-light conditions.

Both devices lack built-in optical image stabilization, and neither has a BSI sensor. They both use a CMOS sensor and offer features like continuous autofocus during video recording, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and manual exposure control. Both cameras also support touch autofocus, and both can create panoramas in-camera. However, the Armor 29 Pro Thermal has the added capability to support slow-motion video recording, while the Xplore 2 does not.

Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and neither has a front-facing LED flash. Both also lack 3D photo or video recording capabilities. Additionally, both devices offer manual ISO, manual focus, and manual white balance adjustments. The Xplore 2 does not include a dual-lens front camera, and the Armor 29 Pro Thermal does not have a front-facing camera under the display, which both share in common.

The Blackview Xplore 2 5G and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal both run Android 15 and share a broad set of similar features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. They also offer the ability to block app tracking, have on-device machine learning, and support notification permissions, media pickers, and customizable notifications. Additionally, both phones feature dark mode, the ability to offload apps, and the capability to track the current position of a mobile device. They also support widgets and are multi-user systems.

There are a few notable similarities and differences in functionality. Both phones lack Wi-Fi password sharing and do not support focus modes. Neither has Quick Start enabled. However, both have battery health check features and an extra dim mode. The Blackview Xplore 2 5G and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal also share features like Live Text, full-page screenshots, split-screen support, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), voice commands, offline voice recognition, and a child lock.

One key difference is that the Xplore 2 supports dynamic theming, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal does not mention dynamic theming, though both phones provide similar customization options. Both devices lack the ability to get direct OS updates, and neither can be used as a PC. Both have sharing intents, but neither supports Mail Privacy Protection or blocks cross-site tracking. Both devices are free and open-source, ensuring flexibility in their usage and software development.

The Blackview Xplore 2 5G and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal both feature large batteries, but with slightly different capacities. The Xplore 2 has a 20,000 mAh battery, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal offers a slightly larger 21,200 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging at 120W, but neither offers wireless charging or reverse wireless charging capabilities.

Both phones come with a charger included in the box, and neither has a removable battery. Both devices are equipped with a battery level indicator and have rechargeable batteries. The Blackview Xplore 2 and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal also share the feature of supporting fast charging, ensuring quick power-ups when needed.

While the battery power and capacity are very close, with just a 1,200 mAh difference between the two, they both provide similar battery-related features such as fast charging and battery level indicators, ensuring a comparable experience in day-to-day usage.

Both the Blackview Xplore 2 5G and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal are equipped with a 3.5 mm audio jack, allowing for wired audio connections. However, there is a difference in their speaker configurations. The Xplore 2 has stereo speakers, providing a more immersive audio experience, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal only features mono speakers.

Neither device supports advanced Bluetooth audio codecs such as aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, so users won’t have access to high-resolution wireless audio streaming. The Xplore 2 and Armor 29 Pro Thermal also lack a radio, meaning neither device offers the ability to listen to FM or AM radio without additional apps or services.

In summary, while both phones offer the standard 3.5 mm audio jack, the Xplore 2’s stereo speakers give it a clear advantage in terms of built-in sound, and neither device supports advanced wireless audio features or a radio.

Both the Blackview Xplore 2 5G and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal support 5G connectivity, ensuring fast mobile data speeds. They both offer a similar range of Wi-Fi capabilities, supporting Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax). Both phones also feature dual SIM card support, Bluetooth functionality, and NFC. Additionally, both phones have USB Type-C ports, with the Xplore 2 using USB version 3, while the Armor 29 Pro Thermal uses USB version 2, which could imply slower data transfer speeds on the latter.

The Bluetooth versions are also slightly different, with the Xplore 2 featuring Bluetooth 5.3 and the Armor 29 Pro Thermal using Bluetooth 5.4, which may offer incremental improvements in range and data transfer speeds for the Armor 29 Pro Thermal. Both devices have a fingerprint scanner, gyroscope, accelerometer, and GPS, along with a compass. They both also support Galileo and have infrared sensors and barometers, ensuring a robust set of connectivity and sensors for various applications.

Neither device supports motion or optical tracking, and neither includes an HDMI output, stylus, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner. Additionally, both phones lack features such as emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, and a built-in projector. Overall, the two devices are quite similar in their connectivity and feature sets, with the main differences being the USB version and Bluetooth version.

Both the Blackview Xplore 2 5G and Ulefone Armor 29 Pro Thermal come with a video light, providing enhanced lighting for video recording or photography in low-light conditions. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, so both have traditional flat displays with standard glass protection.

In terms of miscellaneous features, the two devices are nearly identical. Both offer the same functionality, including the presence of a video light, but they share the same limitations, such as lacking advanced display technologies like sapphire, curved, or e-paper displays.

In conclusion, both the Xplore 2 and Armor 29 Pro Thermal provide the same set of additional features, with no notable differences in their miscellaneous specifications.