boAt Airdopes 141 Elite VS OnePlus Nord Buds 3R

Both the boAt Airdopes 141 Elite and the OnePlus Nord Buds 3R are in-ear designs, offering a similar fit. However, the Airdopes 141 Elite has an IPX5 rating for water resistance, while the Nord Buds 3R offers a slightly higher IP55 rating, indicating a slightly better level of protection against dust and water.

Neither product features a neckband, and both are fully wireless, with no cables involved. Neither product includes wingtips, RGB lighting, UV light, or a display. Both also feature stereo speakers, ensuring full audio quality for each earbud.

In terms of water resistance, both are classified as water-resistant, with no significant differences in that regard. Overall, both products offer a similar design approach, with small differences in their IP rating and features like wingtips or lighting that are absent in both models.

Both the boAt Airdopes 141 Elite and the OnePlus Nord Buds 3R feature passive noise reduction, but neither offers active noise cancellation (ANC). In terms of driver unit size, the Airdopes 141 Elite has a 10 mm driver, while the Nord Buds 3R have a larger 12.4 mm driver unit.

Both earbuds have the same frequency range, spanning from 20 Hz to 20000 Hz. The Airdopes 141 Elite does not support spatial audio, while the Nord Buds 3R does support it, adding an extra layer of immersive sound experience.

Neither product features Dolby Atmos, Dirac Virtuo, or a neodymium magnet, so sound quality is likely to be similar in these aspects. Overall, the main differences between the two models in this group are the larger driver size and spatial audio support in the Nord Buds 3R.

The boAt Airdopes 141 Elite and the OnePlus Nord Buds 3R both have rechargeable batteries and feature a battery level indicator. However, the Airdopes 141 Elite offers 8 hours of battery life on a single charge, while the Nord Buds 3R provide a longer 12 hours of battery life.

In terms of battery life with the charging case, the Airdopes 141 Elite offers 36 hours, which is slightly higher than the Nord Buds 3R's 32 hours. The charging times also differ, with the Airdopes 141 Elite taking 1.5 hours to fully charge, compared to the Nord Buds 3R’s 2-hour charge time.

Neither product supports wireless charging or has a solar power battery, so both rely on standard charging methods.

Both the boAt Airdopes 141 Elite and the OnePlus Nord Buds 3R have USB Type-C charging, but neither supports fast pairing or Bluetooth pairing via NFC. The Airdopes 141 Elite uses Bluetooth 5.3, while the Nord Buds 3R features the slightly newer Bluetooth 5.4. Both products offer a maximum Bluetooth range of 10 meters.

In terms of audio codecs, neither earbud supports LDAC, LDHC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Low Latency, aptX HD, aptX, aptX Lossless, or AAC. Both earbuds also lack Bluetooth LE Audio support and do not have aptX Voice or Auracast.

When it comes to audio latency, the Airdopes 141 Elite has a latency of 50 ms, while the Nord Buds 3R offer a slightly lower latency of 47 ms.

Both the boAt Airdopes 141 Elite and the OnePlus Nord Buds 3R share a number of common features, such as support for fast charging, the ability to be used as a headset, a mute function, a control panel placed on the device, voice prompts, and the inclusion of a travel bag. Neither product offers ambient sound mode, in/on-ear detection, or a built-in camera remote control function, and both lack a temperature sensor.

The Airdopes 141 Elite does not have the find device feature, while the Nord Buds 3R include this functionality. In addition, neither product can read notifications, but both have a mute function and can be used as a headset.

Overall, the key difference in this group is the inclusion of the find device feature on the Nord Buds 3R, which is absent on the Airdopes 141 Elite.

Both the boAt Airdopes 141 Elite and the OnePlus Nord Buds 3R feature 4 microphones and include a noise-canceling microphone. The specifications for both products in this group are identical, with no differences between them.

As both products have the same number of microphones and the same noise-canceling functionality, their microphone performance should be comparable.

Overall, there is no distinction between the two products in terms of microphone capabilities based on the provided specifications.