boAt Rockerz 512 ANC VS Claw SM70

Both the boAt Rockerz 512 ANC and Claw SM70 have an over-ear fit, providing full ear coverage for comfort and sound isolation. However, the boAt Rockerz 512 ANC offers the added convenience of being sweat-resistant, while the Claw SM70 does not provide any water resistance rating.

When it comes to portability, the boAt Rockerz 512 ANC can be folded, making it easier to store or carry around. In contrast, the Claw SM70 does not have a foldable design, which might make it less compact for travel.

Both products include a travel bag, so you won't need to purchase one separately. Neither model is designed specifically for kids, and both have stereo speakers for a balanced sound experience. Neither product has an open-back design, keeping sound enclosed within the earcups.

The boAt Rockerz 512 ANC features active noise cancellation (ANC), while the Claw SM70 does not include this feature. This means the Rockerz 512 ANC can better block out ambient noise during use, enhancing focus on audio content. Both products have a passive noise reduction feature, helping to isolate sound even without ANC.

In terms of frequency range, the Claw SM70 has a slightly wider span, with a lowest frequency of 18 Hz compared to the Rockerz 512 ANC's 20 Hz, and a highest frequency of 28,000 Hz compared to 20,000 Hz on the Rockerz 512 ANC. This difference suggests that the Claw SM70 may be capable of reproducing deeper bass and higher treble frequencies, potentially offering a broader sound range.

Both headphones use 40 mm driver units, meaning they are likely to deliver a similar level of sound pressure and overall audio output. Neither product supports spatial audio, and both lack a neodymium magnet, which is typically used to enhance the magnetic field in drivers for better sound quality.

The boAt Rockerz 512 ANC features a USB Type-C port, which offers a modern and convenient charging solution. In contrast, the Claw SM70 does not include a USB Type-C port, meaning it likely uses an older charging method. Neither product has a solar power battery, so both require conventional charging methods to power up.

In summary, the Rockerz 512 ANC has the advantage of a USB Type-C connection, while the Claw SM70 lacks this feature. Both products, however, rely on standard charging without solar power capabilities.

The boAt Rockerz 512 ANC offers wireless connectivity, allowing for a more flexible and cable-free listening experience. On the other hand, the Claw SM70 uses a wired connection, which may limit movement and require staying close to the audio source.

In summary, the Rockerz 512 ANC provides the convenience of wireless use, while the Claw SM70 requires a wired connection for operation.

The boAt Rockerz 512 ANC has an ambient sound mode, which allows users to hear external sounds while still listening to audio, providing a more situational awareness. The Claw SM70, however, does not offer this feature.

Both the boAt Rockerz 512 ANC and Claw SM70 have a control panel placed on the device, allowing you to adjust settings without needing to interact with the connected audio source. Neither product features in/on-ear detection, and both can be used as a headset for calls or communication.

Both models lack an in-line control panel, so users won’t have direct controls on the cable for quick adjustments. The features are quite similar overall, with the key difference being the inclusion of ambient sound mode on the boAt Rockerz 512 ANC.