CMF Phone 2 Pro VS Motorola Moto G67 Power

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Motorola Moto G67 Power are water resistant, with the CMF Phone 2 Pro having an IP54 rating and the Moto G67 Power featuring a slightly higher IP64 rating, offering more protection against dust and water. In terms of physical dimensions, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is slightly lighter, weighing 185 g compared to the Moto G67 Power's 210 g. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is also thinner, at 7.8 mm, while the Moto G67 Power is 8.6 mm thick.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro is slightly wider at 78 mm compared to the Moto G67 Power’s 76.5 mm. In terms of height, the Moto G67 Power is marginally taller at 166.2 mm, compared to the CMF Phone 2 Pro’s 164 mm. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a volume of 99.78 cm³, while the Moto G67 Power is slightly bulkier with a volume of 109.34 cm³.

Neither phone has a rugged build or the ability to fold, so they are both similar in terms of overall design durability. The key differences between the two products in this group come down to the minor variations in size, weight, and IP rating, with the CMF Phone 2 Pro being slightly lighter and thinner, while the Moto G67 Power is a bit more water-resistant and bulkier.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Motorola Moto G67 Power differ significantly in display technology. The CMF Phone 2 Pro features an OLED/AMOLED display, while the Moto G67 Power uses an LCD IPS display. This gives the CMF Phone 2 Pro the potential for better contrast and color vibrancy, thanks to the inherent qualities of OLED. In terms of screen size, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a 6.77″ display, slightly larger than the Moto G67 Power's 6.7″ display.

Both devices share a resolution of 1080 x 2392 px (CMF Phone 2 Pro) and 1080 x 2400 px (Moto G67 Power), which are very similar, offering high-definition clarity. The pixel densities are also comparable, with the CMF Phone 2 Pro at 388 ppi and the Moto G67 Power slightly higher at 391 ppi, making the difference negligible in terms of sharpness.

The refresh rate is identical for both phones at 120Hz, offering smooth scrolling and gaming experiences. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a significantly higher touch sampling rate of 1000Hz, whereas the Moto G67 Power has a touch sampling rate of 0Hz, indicating no specific data available. Brightness-wise, the CMF Phone 2 Pro can reach 800 nits, but the brightness for the Moto G67 Power is listed as 0 nits, which likely indicates a missing or unreported value. The CMF Phone 2 Pro supports both HDR10 and HDR10+, whereas the Moto G67 Power only supports HDR10. Neither phone supports Dolby Vision. Additionally, the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers an Always-On Display feature, while the Moto G67 Power does not.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Motorola Moto G67 Power feature 256GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, offering similar storage and memory capacities. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 chipset, while the Moto G67 Power uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset. Both chipsets are built on a 4 nm process and support 64-bit architecture, with both devices utilizing big.LITTLE technology and having 8 CPU threads. The CMF Phone 2 Pro's CPU cores run at 2.5 GHz and 2 GHz, while the Moto G67 Power's cores run at 2.4 GHz and 1.95 GHz.

In terms of benchmark performance, the CMF Phone 2 Pro scored 2874 in the Geekbench 6 multi-core test and 1007 in the single-core test. The Moto G67 Power achieved a multi-core score of 2970 and a single-core score of 1015, slightly outperforming the CMF Phone 2 Pro in both cases.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro's GPU, the Mali G615 MC2, runs at a clock speed of 1047 MHz, while the Moto G67 Power's Adreno 710 GPU operates at 940 MHz. Additionally, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a much faster RAM speed of 6400 MHz compared to the Moto G67 Power's 3200 MHz. Both devices support DirectX 12, have integrated LTE, and feature integrated graphics. Both phones also have a maximum memory capacity of 16GB, although neither has been configured with more than 8GB of RAM in these models.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Motorola Moto G67 Power both feature dual-lens main cameras, but with different configurations. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a 50 MP + 50 MP + 8 MP main camera setup, while the Moto G67 Power includes a 50 MP + 8 MP configuration. The wide aperture of the CMF Phone 2 Pro’s lenses is slightly wider at f/1.9 for the main and secondary lenses, compared to the Moto G67 Power’s f/2.2 and f/1.8 apertures. Both phones support 2160 x 30 fps video recording, have CMOS sensors, and feature phase-detection autofocus for photos and continuous autofocus during video recording.

In terms of front-facing cameras, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a 16 MP front camera with a wide aperture of f/2.0, while the Moto G67 Power is equipped with a 32 MP front camera and a slightly wider f/2.2 aperture. Both phones have touch autofocus on their front cameras, but neither has a dual-lens front camera. The CMF Phone 2 Pro also offers optical zoom at 2x, while the Moto G67 Power does not support optical zoom, instead having a 0x zoom.

Both devices support slow-motion video, timelapse functions, and manual settings like exposure, ISO, and white balance. Neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and neither has a front-facing LED flash. The CMF Phone 2 Pro also includes a 1-LED flash for the main camera, while the Moto G67 Power has a dual-LED flash. Neither device shoots 360° panoramas, nor do they feature laser autofocus or shoot in RAW format.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Motorola Moto G67 Power run on Android 15, providing a similar software foundation. They share a wide range of features, including clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, app tracking blocking, on-device machine learning, and customizable notifications. Both phones also support media pickers, full-page screenshots, split screen, and PiP (Picture-in-Picture) mode. Neither device offers direct OS updates but both support offline voice recognition, voice commands, and tracking the current position of the device.

Additional common features include dark mode, battery health checks, dynamic theming, app offloading, Live Text, and sharing intents. Both phones also support widgets, are free and open source, and feature a child lock. Neither phone supports Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, Quick Start, or can be used as a PC. Furthermore, both devices support multi-user systems and have manual exposure controls for photos.

The only difference between the two is that the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers an extra dim mode, which the Moto G67 Power does not include.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Motorola Moto G67 Power differ in battery capacities. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a 5000 mAh battery, while the Moto G67 Power comes with a larger 7000 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, with the CMF Phone 2 Pro offering a charging speed of 33W, slightly higher than the Moto G67 Power's 30W. Neither phone supports wireless charging or has a removable battery, and both have rechargeable batteries.

Both phones feature a battery level indicator to help users monitor their charge. The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Moto G67 Power also share the same feature of having non-removable, rechargeable batteries, ensuring long-term use without the need for frequent replacements.

Overall, the key difference between the two is the battery capacity, with the Moto G67 Power offering a larger 7000 mAh battery, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro provides a smaller 5000 mAh option with slightly faster charging capabilities.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Motorola Moto G67 Power differ in their audio features. The CMF Phone 2 Pro does not have a 3.5 mm audio jack, while the Moto G67 Power includes a 3.5 mm audio jack for wired headphones. In terms of audio output, the CMF Phone 2 Pro lacks stereo speakers, whereas the Moto G67 Power is equipped with stereo speakers for a fuller sound experience.

Both phones do not support advanced Bluetooth audio codecs such as aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. Neither device includes a radio function, and both phones feature two microphones for capturing audio.

Overall, the main differences in the audio category are the inclusion of a 3.5 mm audio jack and stereo speakers in the Moto G67 Power, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers a more minimalistic audio setup.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Motorola Moto G67 Power both support 5G connectivity, ensuring fast mobile data speeds. The CMF Phone 2 Pro offers faster download speeds at 3270 MBits/s, compared to the Moto G67 Power's 2900 MBits/s, though the Moto G67 Power supports a higher upload speed of 1500 MBits/s, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers 3270 MBits/s for both download and upload. Both devices support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) on the CMF Phone 2 Pro. The Moto G67 Power does not support Wi-Fi 6.

Both phones have 2 SIM card slots, Bluetooth connectivity (with the CMF Phone 2 Pro using Bluetooth 5.3 and the Moto G67 Power using Bluetooth 5.1), and USB Type-C ports. Both phones feature NFC, fingerprint scanners, GPS, and compasses. Additionally, both devices have a gyroscope, accelerometer, and a cellular module, but neither phone includes features like a barometer, infrared sensor, HDMI output, or a built-in projector.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro has an external memory slot for expandable storage, which is not available on the Moto G67 Power. Both phones support Galileo, but neither includes 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, motion tracking, or optical tracking. The CMF Phone 2 Pro supports a higher Bluetooth version (5.3) compared to the Moto G67 Power's Bluetooth 5.1, and it also has faster download speeds, making it slightly more advanced in terms of connectivity features.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Motorola Moto G67 Power are equipped with a video light, making it easier to capture photos or videos in low-light conditions. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, meaning both phones have standard flat screens without specialized display technology or materials.

In summary, both phones are quite similar in the miscellaneous features category, with only the inclusion of a video light being the standout shared feature. No other advanced display or glass features are present on either device.