CMF Phone 2 Pro VS Realme P4 5G

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Realme P4 5G offer water resistance, but they differ in terms of their Ingress Protection (IP) ratings. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has an IP54 rating, which means it is protected against dust to a limited extent and can withstand splashes of water. In contrast, the Realme P4 5G features an IP66 rating, offering better protection against dust and more robust resistance to water, including powerful jets of water.

When it comes to size, the two phones are quite similar but not identical. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is slightly larger in width (78 mm) and height (164 mm) compared to the Realme P4 5G, which measures 75.9 mm in width and 163.3 mm in height. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is also a bit thicker at 7.8 mm, while the Realme P4 5G is slightly thinner at 7.6 mm.

In terms of weight, both phones are identical, weighing 185 g. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a volume of 99.7776 cm³, while the Realme P4 5G is a bit more compact, with a volume of 94.198 cm³. Neither phone has a rugged build or the ability to fold, so both are standard smartphones in these aspects.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Realme P4 5G both feature OLED/AMOLED displays with a 6.77-inch screen size and a resolution of 1080 x 2392 px, ensuring sharp and vibrant visuals. Both phones also have a pixel density of 388 ppi, meaning text and images should appear crisp and detailed on either device.

In terms of refresh rate, the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers 120Hz, while the Realme P4 5G has a higher refresh rate of 144Hz, which could translate to smoother scrolling and gameplay. The touch sampling rate is also higher on the Realme P4 5G, at 240Hz compared to the CMF Phone 2 Pro's 1000Hz. This could indicate faster touch response on the CMF Phone 2 Pro, although both devices should offer responsive touch interactions.

The brightness level on the Realme P4 5G is significantly higher, reaching 1600 nits, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro peaks at 800 nits. This means the Realme P4 5G's display should perform better in bright environments. The CMF Phone 2 Pro supports HDR10 and HDR10+, while the Realme P4 5G does not support either. Both phones offer Always-On Display functionality, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a higher contrast ratio at 1000000:1 compared to the Realme P4 5G's 5000000:1. Neither phone has branded damage-resistant glass, and both feature touch screens with no secondary display or Dolby Vision support.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Realme P4 5G come with 256GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, offering solid performance for multitasking and storage needs. They both also share the same GPU, the Mali G615 MC2, and support integrated LTE. The CPU configuration is also similar, with both phones using a big.LITTLE architecture, 8 CPU threads, and a 64-bit architecture. However, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a slightly lower CPU clock speed, with 4 cores running at 2.5 GHz and 4 cores at 2.0 GHz, compared to the Realme P4 5G’s 2.6 GHz and 2.0 GHz setup.

Another point of comparison is the chipset: the CMF Phone 2 Pro uses the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Realme P4 5G is equipped with the Dimensity 7400. Both phones have the same semiconductor size of 4 nm and the same maximum supported memory of 16GB. The GPU clock speed on both devices is identical at 1047 MHz, and both phones support DirectX 12 and integrated graphics. RAM speed is also the same for both at 6400 MHz, and both devices use DDR5 memory.

In terms of other performance features, both phones offer HMP (Heterogeneous Multi-Processing), ensuring efficient task management, and support one display. They also share the same number of transistors at 6200 million. The Realme P4 5G, with its higher CPU clock speed and slightly newer Dimensity 7400 chipset, may offer some performance advantages, though the actual user experience should be comparable between the two models given their very similar specifications.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Realme P4 5G both feature a dual-lens main camera, but their setups differ in terms of megapixels and aperture. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a main camera with two 50 MP sensors and an 8 MP sensor, with wide apertures of f/1.9 for both the 50 MP sensors and f/2.2 for the 8 MP sensor. In contrast, the Realme P4 5G has a 50 MP main camera paired with a 2 MP sensor, with wider apertures of f/2.2 for the 50 MP lens and f/1.8 for the 2 MP lens.

Both phones have a 16 MP front camera with a wide aperture, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro’s front camera has a f/2.0 aperture, while the Realme P4 5G’s front camera has a slightly wider f/2.4 aperture. Both phones lack a front-facing LED flash, dual-tone LED flash, or a BSI sensor. They also both support 2160p video recording at 30 fps from their main cameras, with continuous autofocus during movie recording, phase-detection autofocus for photos, slow-motion video recording, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera.

On the software side, both phones offer built-in HDR modes, manual exposure, manual ISO, and manual white balance. Neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. While both devices can shoot raw photos, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has optical zoom with 2x magnification, whereas the Realme P4 5G does not have optical zoom, and its zoom capability is 0x. Both phones have manual focus, serial shot mode, timelapse functionality, and touch autofocus, but neither features laser autofocus or 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Realme P4 5G run on Android 15 and share most of the same features when it comes to their operating systems. These features include clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, the ability to block app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, dark mode, battery health checks, an extra dim mode, dynamic theming, app offloading, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split-screen support, and PiP (Picture-in-Picture) functionality. Both devices also support voice commands, offline voice recognition, and multi-user systems, and they can track the current position of the mobile device.

Neither phone has focus modes, Wi-Fi password sharing, Quick Start, or the ability to be used as a PC. They also lack Mail Privacy Protection, and both block cross-site tracking but do not support cross-site blocking. Features such as sharing intents, child lock, and widget support are available on both devices. Additionally, both phones support direct OS updates but do not offer them automatically.

One small difference between the two phones is that both have identical operating system features, so there are no distinguishing factors in this category aside from the fact that both phones are equipped with the same core Android 15 features and capabilities.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Realme P4 5G both have rechargeable, non-removable batteries, but they differ in battery capacity and charging capabilities. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is equipped with a 5000 mAh battery, while the Realme P4 5G has a larger 7000 mAh battery, offering a higher potential for longer usage between charges.

Both phones support fast charging, but the charging speed differs significantly. The CMF Phone 2 Pro supports a 33W charging speed, whereas the Realme P4 5G supports a much faster 80W charging speed. Additionally, the Realme P4 5G comes with a charger in the box, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro does not include one.

Neither phone supports wireless charging, and both have a battery level indicator to monitor remaining charge. Both phones also feature a rechargeable battery, ensuring they can be charged multiple times over their lifespan.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Realme P4 5G do not feature a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning both rely on wireless or USB audio solutions. However, the Realme P4 5G does include stereo speakers, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro lacks this feature, so the Realme P4 5G should offer a richer sound experience without external speakers.

Neither phone supports aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, meaning both are limited in terms of high-definition audio codecs over Bluetooth. This makes the audio performance over wireless headphones more standard rather than optimized for high-quality audio streaming.

Overall, the key difference in the audio category is that the Realme P4 5G includes stereo speakers, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro does not, but both phones share the lack of 3.5 mm audio jack support and advanced Bluetooth audio codec support.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Realme P4 5G support 5G connectivity and come with 2 SIM card slots. They both feature USB Type-C, NFC, and a fingerprint scanner. The Bluetooth version differs slightly, with the CMF Phone 2 Pro using Bluetooth 5.3 and the Realme P4 5G using Bluetooth 5.4, offering a minor improvement in wireless communication capabilities on the latter. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has an external memory slot, whereas the Realme P4 5G does not provide this feature.

Both phones have built-in GPS, a compass, a gyroscope, and an accelerometer. The Realme P4 5G has slightly fewer Wi-Fi options, supporting Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro also includes Wi-Fi 6 in addition to the same Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5 standards. Neither phone features emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, an infrared sensor, or a barometer, and both lack HDMI output and 3D facial recognition. Additionally, neither device includes a stylus or a built-in projector.

One notable feature is that both phones support Galileo for satellite navigation, but neither supports ANT+, has a heart rate monitor, motion tracking, optical tracking, or has an iris scanner. Both devices also lack DLNA certification, and neither offers a cellular module or an HDMI output. These phones are equipped with similar core connectivity and sensor features, with the CMF Phone 2 Pro providing slightly more Wi-Fi support and the Realme P4 5G having Bluetooth 5.4.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Realme P4 5G are equipped with a video light, which can be useful for improving the quality of videos in low-light conditions. Neither phone features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, so both devices share similar display characteristics in terms of material and design.

Overall, the key difference in this group is that both phones have the same features: a video light, no sapphire glass, no curved displays, and no e-paper displays. There are no other significant distinctions in these specifications.

This group highlights that both phones are equipped with standard features for their display and video capabilities without advanced glass materials or unique display technologies.