CMF Phone 2 Pro VS Vivo T4 Ultra 5G

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G are water resistant, but their specific ingress protection ratings differ. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has an IP54 rating, meaning it can handle dust ingress to a certain extent and withstand water splashes. On the other hand, the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G boasts a higher IP64 rating, which indicates it is also dust-tight and can resist water splashes, providing slightly better protection overall.

In terms of size and weight, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is slightly lighter, weighing 185 g compared to the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G's 192 g. The CMF Phone 2 Pro also has a slightly greater thickness at 7.8 mm, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G is slimmer at 7.5 mm. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is a bit wider at 78 mm, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G is narrower at 75 mm. Additionally, the CMF Phone 2 Pro stands taller at 164 mm, compared to the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G's 160.6 mm. This makes the CMF Phone 2 Pro marginally larger in terms of both width and height.

As for volume, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a slightly larger volume of 99.7776 cm³, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G's volume is 90.3375 cm³, making the CMF Phone 2 Pro more spacious overall. Both devices do not feature a rugged build, nor are they foldable, which is consistent across both models.

The displays on both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G use OLED/AMOLED technology, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The CMF Phone 2 Pro features a 6.77″ screen, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G is slightly smaller with a 6.67″ display. The pixel density of the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G is higher at 460 ppi compared to the CMF Phone 2 Pro’s 388 ppi, meaning the Vivo’s display will deliver sharper details.

In terms of resolution, the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers a 1080 x 2392 px resolution, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G has a higher 1260 x 2800 px resolution. This results in the Vivo having a higher overall pixel count, contributing to a crisper and more detailed display.

Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and transitions. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a typical brightness of 800 nits, whereas the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G stands out with a much brighter 1600 nits. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has branded damage-resistant glass, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G does not. Both phones support Always-On Display, but only the CMF Phone 2 Pro supports HDR10 and HDR10+, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G lacks support for these features. Neither device supports Dolby Vision, nor do they have a secondary screen. Both phones feature touchscreens as expected.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G differ significantly in terms of performance specifications. The CMF Phone 2 Pro comes with 256GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G offers a larger 512GB of storage and 12GB of RAM. This gives the Vivo model more capacity for both storage and multitasking.

When it comes to processing power, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is equipped with a MediaTek Dimensity 7300 chipset, featuring a CPU with 4 cores running at 2.5 GHz and 4 cores running at 2 GHz. The Vivo T4 Ultra 5G, on the other hand, uses a more powerful MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus chipset, with a CPU that includes 1 core running at 3.4 GHz, 3 cores running at 2.85 GHz, and 4 cores at 2 GHz. This results in a higher overall CPU performance for the Vivo model. Additionally, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a GPU clock speed of 1047 MHz with a Mali G615 MC2 GPU, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G's GPU runs at 1300 MHz with an Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU, which offers a boost in graphical performance.

The AnTuTu benchmark score for the CMF Phone 2 Pro is 711907, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G scores significantly higher at 2136863, reflecting the Vivo’s superior overall performance. In Geekbench 6 tests, the CMF Phone 2 Pro scores 2874 in multi-core and 1007 in single-core, whereas the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G achieves 7547 in multi-core and 2302 in single-core, further demonstrating its greater processing capabilities. The RAM speed of the CMF Phone 2 Pro is 6400 MHz, compared to the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G’s 4800 MHz. Both devices use a 4 nm semiconductor size and support 64-bit architecture, with the CMF Phone 2 Pro supporting a maximum of 16GB of RAM, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G supports up to 24GB. Both devices also include integrated LTE, integrated graphics, and utilize big.LITTLE technology with HMP.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G feature a triple-lens main camera setup with 50 MP, 50 MP, and 8 MP sensors, though the wide aperture values slightly differ. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has two lenses with a 1.9f aperture and one with a 2.2f aperture, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G has a 1.9f, 2.6f, and 2.2f aperture combination. Both devices support optical zoom, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers 2x optical zoom, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G has a more powerful 3x optical zoom. Both phones are capable of recording video at 2160 x 30 fps with a built-in HDR mode, and both include phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus for movies, and support for slow-motion video recording.

The front camera of the CMF Phone 2 Pro is 16 MP with a 2f aperture, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G features a much higher resolution 32 MP front camera with a 2.5f aperture. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash, and neither offers a dual-lens front camera. Both devices support features like manual exposure, manual ISO, manual white balance, and touch autofocus for the front camera. Neither device supports HDR10 recording or Dolby Vision recording.

When it comes to additional camera features, both phones can create panoramas in-camera and offer a timelapse function. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a minimum focal length of 15 mm and a maximum of 50 mm, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G has a minimum focal length of 23 mm and a maximum of 85 mm. Neither phone supports laser autofocus, 360° panorama shooting, or 3D photo/video recording capabilities, but both phones feature a single LED flash on the main camera.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G run on Android 15 and offer similar privacy and security features. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and have theme customization. They also allow blocking app tracking and have on-device machine learning. Additionally, both phones support notification permissions, media pickers, dark mode, battery health checks, and the ability to offload apps.

Both devices also offer full-page screenshots, support split-screen functionality, have picture-in-picture (PiP), and support widgets. Neither phone offers Mail Privacy Protection or Wi-Fi password sharing, nor do they have Quick Start. Additionally, both phones have customizable notifications, support voice commands, track the current position of a mobile device, and are multi-user systems. Both also have offline voice recognition, and both devices are free and open source.

Some differences between the two phones include that neither offers focus modes, but both have an extra dim mode and support dynamic theming. The Vivo T4 Ultra 5G and CMF Phone 2 Pro are essentially identical in their operating system features, with no significant distinctions in their core functionalities as per the provided specs.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro is equipped with a 5000 mAh battery, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G features a slightly larger 5500 mAh battery. Both devices do not support wireless charging. The CMF Phone 2 Pro supports fast charging at 33W, whereas the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G offers significantly faster fast charging at 90W, allowing for quicker recharging times. The CMF Phone 2 Pro does not come with a charger, whereas the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G includes a charger in the box. Neither phone has a removable battery, but both have a rechargeable battery, a battery level indicator, and support battery health monitoring.

Both phones share the feature of fast charging support, but the major difference lies in the charging speed, with the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G offering a much higher 90W charging speed compared to the CMF Phone 2 Pro’s 33W. Additionally, the inclusion of a charger with the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G could be an added convenience for users who need a charger out of the box, which is not the case for the CMF Phone 2 Pro.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C headphones. The CMF Phone 2 Pro does not feature stereo speakers, whereas the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G is equipped with stereo speakers for a more immersive audio experience.

Neither phone supports aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, meaning both are limited in terms of high-quality Bluetooth audio codec support. Additionally, neither device includes a radio, so users won't be able to tune into FM or other radio frequencies.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G support 5G connectivity and are equipped with Wi-Fi versions Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax). Both devices offer dual SIM card support and include USB Type-C ports. Both phones also feature NFC for wireless communication and have Bluetooth capabilities, with the CMF Phone 2 Pro supporting Bluetooth 5.3 and the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G supporting the slightly newer Bluetooth 5.4.

Regarding network speeds, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has download and upload speeds of 3270 MBits/s, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G offers much faster speeds, with download speeds of 10000 MBits/s and upload speeds of 7000 MBits/s. The fingerprint scanner is present on both devices, and both feature a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and compass. Neither phone includes an infrared sensor, barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, iris scanner, or built-in projector.

Some differences between the two devices include that the CMF Phone 2 Pro has an external memory slot, while the Vivo T4 Ultra 5G does not. Both phones support Galileo satellite navigation, but neither has motion tracking or optical tracking features. The Vivo T4 Ultra 5G does not support an external memory slot, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro does, offering more flexibility for additional storage expansion.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G are equipped with a video light, which can help improve low-light video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass, a curved display, or an e-paper display, so their displays are likely more traditional in design and material. These aspects are identical across both products, meaning neither stands out in terms of display technology or special glass coatings in this regard.

In summary, the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4 Ultra 5G share the same set of features in the miscellaneous category, with both offering a video light but lacking advanced display technologies like sapphire glass or a curved display.