CMF Phone 2 Pro VS Vivo T4R

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4R both offer water resistance, but the Vivo T4R is rated as waterproof with an IP68 rating, whereas the CMF Phone 2 Pro is rated IP54, offering basic water resistance. In terms of size, the Vivo T4R is slightly lighter at 183.5 g compared to the CMF Phone 2 Pro's 185 g. The Vivo T4R is also a bit thinner at 7.4 mm compared to the CMF Phone 2 Pro's 7.8 mm, and it is marginally more compact in width and height (76.7 mm vs 78 mm and 163.3 mm vs 164 mm, respectively). Additionally, the Vivo T4R has a smaller overall volume of 92.69 cm³, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a larger volume at 99.78 cm³.

Neither phone has a rugged build, and neither can be folded. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is water resistant, while the Vivo T4R offers a higher level of water protection with its waterproof rating. The thickness and dimensions also reveal that the Vivo T4R is slightly more compact in both size and weight, which may appeal to users looking for a more portable option.

Overall, both devices offer similar features but with differences in water protection and size, with the Vivo T4R being a more compact and water-resistant option compared to the CMF Phone 2 Pro.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4R feature an OLED/AMOLED display type with identical screen sizes of 6.77″, pixel density of 388 ppi, and resolution of 1080 x 2392 px. Both devices also offer a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth performance during interactions. Both phones support an Always-On Display, and both have a touchscreen.

However, there are key differences between the two displays. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is equipped with branded damage-resistant glass, while the Vivo T4R lacks this feature. Additionally, the CMF Phone 2 Pro supports both HDR10 and HDR10+ for enhanced color and contrast, while the Vivo T4R does not support either of these HDR standards. Neither device supports Dolby Vision or features a secondary screen.

In summary, the display specifications of both phones are nearly identical in terms of size, resolution, and performance. The CMF Phone 2 Pro offers a few extra enhancements, such as branded damage-resistant glass and HDR support, which the Vivo T4R lacks.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4R share several key performance features, but there are some notable differences in their specifications. Both phones have the same internal storage capacity of 256GB, and both come with integrated LTE, support 64-bit processing, and use the MediaTek Dimensity series chipset. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is powered by the Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo T4R uses the slightly more advanced Dimensity 7400.

In terms of RAM, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has 8GB, while the Vivo T4R comes with 12GB. Both devices use the same RAM speed of 6400 MHz and the same DDR5 memory version. The CPU configurations are similar, with both phones utilizing a big.LITTLE architecture and having 8 CPU threads. However, the Vivo T4R has a slightly higher CPU speed, with 4 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz and 4 cores at 2 GHz, compared to the CMF Phone 2 Pro’s 2.5 GHz and 2 GHz.

Other specifications are identical between the two devices, including the GPU (Mali G615 MC2), GPU clock speed (1047 MHz), maximum memory support (16GB), semiconductor size (4 nm), and DirectX version (DirectX 12). Both phones also have integrated graphics and use HMP (Heterogeneous Multi-Processing) technology. Despite the slight differences in RAM and CPU speed, the performance profile of both devices is quite similar.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4R both feature dual-lens main cameras, but with different configurations. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a 50 MP, 50 MP, and 8 MP setup, while the Vivo T4R uses a 50 MP and 2 MP combination. The wide apertures differ as well: the CMF Phone 2 Pro has apertures of 1.9f, 1.9f, and 2.2f, while the Vivo T4R has wider apertures of 2.4f and 1.8f. Both phones offer optical image stabilization and the ability to record video at 2160 x 30 fps, and neither has a dual-tone LED flash.

For front cameras, the CMF Phone 2 Pro comes with a 16 MP front-facing camera with a 2f aperture, while the Vivo T4R offers a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera with a slightly wider aperture of 2.45f. Both phones have features like manual exposure, manual ISO, manual focus, touch autofocus, and timelapse function. They also support slow-motion video recording and in-camera panorama creation.

Other shared features include a CMOS sensor, phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus during video recording, and the ability to shoot 360° panoramas. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash, RGB LED flash, or 3D photo/video recording capabilities. Overall, the differences in camera specs are mainly in the main camera configuration, with the Vivo T4R opting for a simpler 2 MP secondary camera and the CMF Phone 2 Pro offering a more powerful triple-lens setup.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4R both run Android 15 and share a wide range of operating system features. Both devices offer clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, app tracking blocking, on-device machine learning, and notification permissions. They also support features like playing games while they download, dark mode, battery health check, and an extra dim mode. Both phones support widgets, customizable notifications, full-page screenshots, Live Text, and split-screen functionality.

Neither phone provides Wi-Fi password sharing, Mail Privacy Protection, focus modes, or dynamic theming. Additionally, both phones lack the ability to offload apps, support PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and can track the device's current position. Both phones also have offline voice recognition, voice commands, and a multi-user system, with child lock and sharing intents included as well.

Notably, both devices also share the limitation of not receiving direct OS updates, not supporting a PC mode, and not offering Quick Start. In summary, both phones have nearly identical operating system features, with no major differences between them in terms of privacy options, system functionality, or customization.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4R differ slightly in their battery specifications. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is equipped with a 5000 mAh battery, while the Vivo T4R has a larger 5700 mAh battery. Both phones do not support wireless charging and have non-removable, rechargeable batteries. They also include battery level indicators.

In terms of charging, the CMF Phone 2 Pro supports fast charging at 33W, whereas the Vivo T4R supports faster charging at 44W. This difference in charging speed could lead to quicker battery replenishment for the Vivo T4R, though both devices support fast charging capabilities.

Overall, the Vivo T4R offers a slightly larger battery and faster charging speed compared to the CMF Phone 2 Pro, but both devices have similar charging features such as fast charging support and no wireless charging.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4R lack a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to use wireless or USB-C audio solutions. The CMF Phone 2 Pro does not feature stereo speakers, while the Vivo T4R does have stereo speakers for a more immersive audio experience.

Neither phone supports aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless audio codecs. Both phones also lack an FM radio feature, so users looking for radio functionality will not find it on either device.

In summary, the Vivo T4R offers stereo speakers, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro does not. Both phones have similar audio capabilities in terms of codec support and lack of an FM radio.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4R both support 5G connectivity and come with dual SIM slots. Both devices also support the same Wi-Fi versions: Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax). The CMF Phone 2 Pro has Bluetooth 5.3, while the Vivo T4R features Bluetooth 5.4, which is a slightly newer version. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has an external memory slot, while the Vivo T4R does not.

Both phones feature USB Type-C, fingerprint scanners, GPS, a compass, accelerometers, and cellular modules. However, the CMF Phone 2 Pro includes NFC, while the Vivo T4R lacks this feature. Additionally, neither device supports emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, DLNA certification, infrared sensors, barometers, HDMI outputs, 3D facial recognition, iris scanners, or styluses. Both phones support Galileo and have a gyroscope, though neither includes motion or optical tracking, nor a built-in projector.

In summary, the key differences between the two phones in this group are that the CMF Phone 2 Pro has NFC and an external memory slot, while the Vivo T4R has Bluetooth 5.4 but lacks NFC and an external memory slot. Both phones have similar core connectivity features, including 5G, Wi-Fi, GPS, and fingerprint scanners.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo T4R include a video light, which can help illuminate subjects during video recording in low-light conditions. Neither phone features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays.

In summary, the only common feature in this group is the presence of a video light on both devices, with all other display-related features being absent on both phones.