CMF Phone 2 Pro VS Vivo Y400 4G

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo Y400 4G differ in a few design aspects. The CMF Phone 2 Pro weighs 185 g and has a thickness of 7.8 mm, while the Vivo Y400 4G is slightly heavier at 198 g and has a thickness of 7.9 mm. The width of the CMF Phone 2 Pro is 78 mm, which is slightly broader than the Vivo Y400 4G's 75.3 mm. In terms of height, the CMF Phone 2 Pro measures 164 mm, while the Vivo Y400 4G is a bit shorter at 162.3 mm. As for the volume, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a volume of 99.7776 cm³, which is larger than the Vivo Y400 4G's 96.547401 cm³.

When it comes to water protection, the Vivo Y400 4G has a higher level of ingress protection, rated IP68, compared to the CMF Phone 2 Pro's IP54 rating. This means the Vivo Y400 4G is more resistant to water and dust. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is described as water resistant, whereas the Vivo Y400 4G is explicitly marked as waterproof.

Neither device has a rugged build or can be folded, which may be important for those looking for added durability or foldable features. The volume of the CMF Phone 2 Pro is slightly larger, but both devices are relatively similar in size and thickness, with small differences in weight and dimensions.

The displays of the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo Y400 4G share several similarities, both using OLED/AMOLED technology and offering a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling. The CMF Phone 2 Pro has a slightly larger screen size at 6.77″, compared to the 6.67″ display of the Vivo Y400 4G. Both devices have Full HD+ resolutions, with the CMF Phone 2 Pro at 1080 x 2392 px and the Vivo Y400 4G at 1080 x 2400 px, which results in very similar pixel densities of 388 ppi for the CMF Phone 2 Pro and 395 ppi for the Vivo Y400 4G. The difference in pixel density is minimal but slightly favors the Vivo Y400 4G.

When it comes to brightness, the Vivo Y400 4G stands out with a typical brightness of 1200 nits, notably higher than the 800 nits of the CMF Phone 2 Pro. Both devices support HDR10, but only the CMF Phone 2 Pro supports HDR10+ alongside Dolby Vision, while the Vivo Y400 4G does not support either of those features.

Additional features are also fairly consistent across both devices. Both phones have an Always-On Display, and both support touch screens. However, the CMF Phone 2 Pro includes branded damage-resistant glass, whereas the Vivo Y400 4G lacks this feature. Neither phone has a secondary screen.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo Y400 4G share similar performance specifications but differ in several key areas. Both devices offer 256GB of internal storage and 8GB of RAM, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro features faster RAM with a speed of 6400 MHz, compared to the 2133 MHz RAM speed of the Vivo Y400 4G. Both phones also support a maximum memory amount of 16GB and 64-bit processing.

In terms of chipsets, the CMF Phone 2 Pro is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo Y400 4G uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G. The MediaTek chip is built on a smaller 4 nm semiconductor, offering potential efficiency and performance benefits compared to the Snapdragon 685’s 6 nm process. The CMF Phone 2 Pro’s CPU configuration includes four cores running at 2.5 GHz and four at 2 GHz, while the Vivo Y400 4G features a higher CPU speed with four cores at 2.8 GHz and four at 1.9 GHz.

When it comes to GPU performance, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a Mali G615 MC2 GPU with a clock speed of 1047 MHz, while the Vivo Y400 4G is equipped with the Adreno 610 GPU, which has a higher clock speed of 1260 MHz. Geekbench 6 results show the CMF Phone 2 Pro scoring 2874 in multi-core and 1007 in single-core, while the Vivo Y400 4G scores lower at 1510 (multi-core) and 473 (single-core). For Geekbench 5, the CMF Phone 2 Pro performs significantly better with 8046 (multi-core) and 1179 (single-core), while the Vivo Y400 4G scores 1787 (multi-core) and 442 (single-core). Both devices support 64-bit processing and DirectX 12, and they also include integrated LTE and integrated graphics, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro supports DDR5 RAM, while the Vivo Y400 4G uses DDR4 RAM.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo Y400 4G both feature dual-lens main cameras, but with differing configurations. The CMF Phone 2 Pro includes a 50 MP + 50 MP + 8 MP main camera setup, while the Vivo Y400 4G has a 50 MP + 2 MP main camera. The CMF Phone 2 Pro’s main camera offers a wide aperture of 1.9f for the first two lenses and 2.2f for the third lens, while the Vivo Y400 4G has a wider aperture of 2.4f and 1.8f for its lenses. The CMF Phone 2 Pro also offers 2x optical zoom, while the Vivo Y400 4G lacks optical zoom altogether (0x). Both phones support features like phase-detection autofocus, continuous autofocus when recording, manual exposure, manual ISO, serial shot mode, manual focus, and in-camera panorama creation. Both devices also support slow-motion video recording, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro can record in 2160p at 30 fps, while the Vivo Y400 4G is limited to 1080p at 30 fps.

For front cameras, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a 16 MP camera with a 2f aperture, while the Vivo Y400 4G has an 8 MP camera with a slightly wider 2.1f aperture. Neither front camera has a front-facing LED flash. Both phones support features like touch autofocus, manual white balance, and timelapse, but neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. Additionally, neither has a dual-lens front camera or a front-facing camera under the display. Neither device is capable of shooting 360° photos or videos, and neither supports RGB LED flash or 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

While both phones have similar features for photography and videography, the CMF Phone 2 Pro has a more advanced main camera setup with higher megapixel counts and optical zoom, while the Vivo Y400 4G has a more basic camera configuration with fewer features in comparison.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo Y400 4G run on Android 15 and share a very similar set of features in their operating systems. They both offer clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, and the ability to block app tracking. Both devices also support on-device machine learning, customizable notifications, and a media picker. They have dark mode, Wi-Fi password sharing (although neither allows this feature), and battery health checks, along with extra dim modes and dynamic theming.

Additional shared features include the ability to play games while they download, focus modes, offloading apps, full-page screenshots, split-screen support, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and sharing intents. Both phones also have offline voice recognition, voice commands, and the ability to track the device’s position. Other similarities include support for widgets, multi-user systems, and a child lock feature. Neither phone supports Quick Start or direct OS updates, and both are free and open source.

While both phones have the same features, there are no notable differences in the operating system specifications between the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo Y400 4G. The user experience will be virtually identical on both devices in terms of OS functionality.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo Y400 4G have different battery capacities and charging speeds. The CMF Phone 2 Pro is equipped with a 5000 mAh battery, while the Vivo Y400 4G features a slightly larger 6000 mAh battery. Both phones support fast charging, but the Vivo Y400 4G offers faster charging at 44W, compared to the 33W charging speed of the CMF Phone 2 Pro. Neither device supports wireless charging, and both have non-removable, rechargeable batteries. Additionally, both phones come with a battery level indicator to monitor charge status.

Overall, the Vivo Y400 4G has a larger battery and faster charging capabilities, while the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers a smaller battery with slightly slower charging speed.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo Y400 4G both lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning neither device supports wired headphones or other accessories that require the traditional audio socket. In terms of audio features, the CMF Phone 2 Pro does not have stereo speakers, while the Vivo Y400 4G is equipped with stereo speakers, providing a potential advantage in sound quality and volume. Both phones do not support advanced Bluetooth audio technologies like aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, so neither device offers enhanced Bluetooth audio performance.

Additionally, neither phone includes an FM radio, which may be a drawback for users who rely on radio functionality for entertainment or news.

The CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo Y400 4G differ significantly in connectivity features. The CMF Phone 2 Pro supports 5G, while the Vivo Y400 4G only supports 4G. Both phones are equipped with USB Type-C ports and have NFC support. The CMF Phone 2 Pro offers faster download and upload speeds with 3270 MBits/s for both, compared to the Vivo Y400 4G’s download speed of 390 MBits/s and upload speed of 150 MBits/s. Both devices use dual SIM cards, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro also has an external memory slot, which the Vivo Y400 4G lacks.

Both phones feature Bluetooth, with the CMF Phone 2 Pro supporting the newer Bluetooth 5.3 version, while the Vivo Y400 4G supports Bluetooth 5. The CMF Phone 2 Pro includes a fingerprint scanner, GPS, a gyroscope, a compass, and supports Galileo. The Vivo Y400 4G also includes these features, but with Bluetooth 5, slightly lower connectivity speeds, and no external memory slot.

Additional features like motion tracking, optical tracking, and infrared sensors are absent from both phones. Neither device has a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, a stylus, or a built-in projector. Both phones are capable of supporting Wi-Fi and include accelerometers, but the CMF Phone 2 Pro offers more advanced connectivity with 5G support, faster speeds, and an external memory slot, making it more robust in terms of modern connectivity features.

Both the CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo Y400 4G come equipped with a video light, providing users with additional lighting for photos or videos in low-light situations. However, the two phones differ in terms of their displays. The CMF Phone 2 Pro does not have a curved display, while the Vivo Y400 4G features a curved display, adding a distinctive design element. Neither phone includes sapphire glass or an e-paper display.

While both devices offer similar basic features, the Vivo Y400 4G stands out with its curved display, providing a different aesthetic and potentially a more immersive viewing experience compared to the flat display on the CMF Phone 2 Pro.