Both the Colorful Battle AX and the Gigabyte Gaming OC share identical foundations: the same 2325 MHz base clock, 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 80 ROPs, and 1750 MHz memory speed. This means the underlying GPU silicon and memory subsystem are equivalent, and any performance gap between them comes down entirely to how aggressively each card boosts under load.
That is where the Gigabyte Gaming OC pulls ahead. Its 2625 MHz boost clock outpaces the Colorful Battle AX's 2512 MHz — a difference of 113 MHz, or roughly 4.5%. Because pixel fill rate, texture throughput, and floating-point throughput all scale directly with clock speed, this single delta cascades into measurable gaps across every derived metric: the Gaming OC delivers 210 GPixel/s versus 201 GPixel/s, 504 GTexels/s versus 482.3 GTexels/s, and 32.26 TFLOPS versus 30.87 TFLOPS. In practice, a ~4–5% throughput advantage translates to marginally higher average frame rates and slightly more headroom in compute-heavy workloads such as ray tracing and AI-accelerated rendering.
The verdict for this group is clear: the Gigabyte Gaming OC holds a consistent, if modest, performance edge across every metric, driven purely by its higher factory boost clock. Both cards support Double Precision Floating Point, so neither has a qualitative advantage there. If raw out-of-the-box GPU throughput is the priority, the Gaming OC is the stronger choice; the Battle AX effectively trades that clock headroom for whatever other differentiators it may offer elsewhere.
