Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 C36 96GB (2x48GB) VS G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB AMD DDR5-6000 CL28 64GB (2x32GB)

The Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 C36 96GB and the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB AMD DDR5-6000 CL28 64GB are both high-performance memory kits with similar speeds but differ in key specifications. Both kits have a tested memory speed of 6000 MHz and a DDR5 memory version. However, the Corsair Vengeance has a higher CAS Latency (CL) of 36, while the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo features a lower CAS Latency of 28. This suggests that, despite having the same tested speed, the G.Skill kit could offer slightly faster access to memory due to its lower latency.

In terms of true latency, the G.Skill kit again performs better, with a true latency of 9.33 ns compared to the Corsair Vengeance's 12 ns. This further supports the notion that the G.Skill memory may have a slight edge in terms of responsiveness. Both kits have identical tRAS timings of 96 and tRCD timings of 44 (for Corsair) and 36 (for G.Skill), as well as identical tRP timings of 44 (Corsair) and 36 (G.Skill). The timing differences in tRCD and tRP are also in favor of the G.Skill, as it features lower values across the board.

Overall, while both kits have the same tested memory speed and DDR5 version, the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo offers slightly better performance due to its lower CAS Latency and better timing values across the board, resulting in lower true latency and potentially faster access speeds.

The Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 C36 96GB and the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB AMD DDR5-6000 CL28 64GB have a few key similarities and differences in their general specifications. Both memory kits use a 288-pin DIMM form factor, which is standard for desktop systems. In terms of memory size, the Corsair Vengeance kit provides a total of 96GB (2 x 48GB), while the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo offers a smaller total of 64GB (2 x 32GB). This difference in total memory capacity might be important depending on the needs of the system, with Corsair providing more memory overall.

Both products feature identical voltage ratings of 1.4V, and neither product uses Samsung B-Die chips, as indicated by the false value for the ″has Samsung B-Die″ spec in both cases. Additionally, the height of both kits is 44 mm, meaning they should have similar clearance for installation in systems with limited space.

Overall, while both kits share several general specs like voltage, form factor, and height, the Corsair Vengeance offers a larger memory size, making it potentially more suitable for applications that require higher memory capacity, while the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo provides a smaller memory size for those with more modest needs.

The Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 C36 96GB and the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB AMD DDR5-6000 CL28 64GB differ in several features. For memory profile compatibility, the Corsair kit supports Intel XMP 3.0, while the G.Skill kit supports AMD EXPO, meaning they are optimized for different platforms. Neither product supports ECC memory, which is common for enthusiast-level kits aimed at performance rather than error correction.

Both kits have integrated heatsinks, ensuring better heat dissipation under load, which is crucial for maintaining stable performance during intense use. However, when it comes to aesthetics, the Corsair Vengeance has no RGB lighting, while the G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo includes RGB lighting, adding a customizable lighting feature to the system.

In summary, the key differences between these two memory kits in the features group lie in platform optimization, with the Corsair supporting Intel XMP 3.0 and the G.Skill supporting AMD EXPO, and in aesthetics, with the G.Skill offering RGB lighting while the Corsair does not.