TurboVS
Crucial E100 480GB
Orico IG740 Pro 4TB

Crucial E100 480GB Orico IG740 Pro 4TB

Common Features

  • ✓ Both products are of type M2.
  • ✓ Both products use an HMB (Host Memory Buffer) for SSD cache.
  • ✓ Both products are NVMe SSDs.
  • ✓ Both products use TLC for SSD storage type.
  • ✓ Both products support PCI Express version 4.
  • ✓ Both products have 4 controller channels.
  • ✓ Neither product has an integrated heatsink.
  • ✓ Neither product has RGB lighting.

Main Differences

  • • Sequential read speed is 4700 MB/s on Crucial E100 480GB and 7400 MB/s on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB.
  • • Sequential write speed is 2500 MB/s on Crucial E100 480GB and 6500 MB/s on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB.
  • • NVMe version is 1.4 on Crucial E100 480GB and 2 on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB.
  • • Internal storage is 480GB on Crucial E100 480GB and 4000GB on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB.
  • • Controller is Silicon Motion SM2268XT on Crucial E100 480GB and MaxioTech MAP1602A Falcon Lite on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB.
  • • Terabytes Written (TBW) is 60 on Crucial E100 480GB and 2400 on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB.
  • • Warranty period is 3 years on Crucial E100 480GB and 5 years on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB.
Specs Comparison
Crucial E100 480GB

Crucial E100 480GB

Orico IG740 Pro 4TB

Orico IG740 Pro 4TB

Read speed:
sequential read speed 4700 MB/s 7400 MB/s

The Crucial E100 480GB has a sequential read speed of 4700 MB/s, while the Orico IG740 Pro 4TB offers a higher sequential read speed of 7400 MB/s. This shows a significant difference between the two products, with the Orico model delivering faster read performance.

Both products provide specific sequential read speeds, with no other read speed specifications listed for either model. Therefore, the comparison is focused on the sequential read speed value for each product.

In summary, the Orico IG740 Pro 4TB leads with a faster sequential read speed of 7400 MB/s compared to the Crucial E100 480GB's 4700 MB/s, providing a noticeable speed advantage in this aspect.

Write speed:
sequential write speed 2500 MB/s 6500 MB/s

The Crucial E100 480GB has a sequential write speed of 2500 MB/s, while the Orico IG740 Pro 4TB features a significantly higher sequential write speed of 6500 MB/s. This shows a substantial difference in write performance, with the Orico model offering a much faster write speed.

Both products list sequential write speeds, with no other write speed specifications available for either model. Therefore, the comparison is focused solely on the sequential write speed for each product.

In summary, the Orico IG740 Pro 4TB stands out with a faster sequential write speed of 6500 MB/s compared to the Crucial E100 480GB's 2500 MB/s, highlighting a notable advantage in write speed.

General info:
type M2 M2
SSD cache HMB (Host Memory Buffer) HMB (Host Memory Buffer)
Is an NVMe SSD ✓ ✓
NVMe version 1.4 2
internal storage 480GB 4000GB
release date January 2025 May 2025
controller Silicon Motion SM2268XT MaxioTech MAP1602A Falcon Lite
SSD storage type TLC TLC
PCI Express (PCIe) version 4 4
Controller channels 4 4
Terabytes Written (TBW) 60 2400
warranty period 3 years 5 years
Has an integrated heatsink ✕ ✕
has RGB lighting ✕ ✕

The Crucial E100 480GB and the Orico IG740 Pro 4TB share several similar features but also have some key differences in their general specifications. Both products are M.2 NVMe SSDs with HMB (Host Memory Buffer) for their SSD cache, use TLC NAND storage, and are based on PCIe version 4 with 4 controller channels. However, there are notable differences in their other specifications.

The Crucial E100 480GB has an NVMe version of 1.4, while the Orico IG740 Pro 4TB supports the newer NVMe version 2. The internal storage capacity also differs, with the Crucial offering 480GB compared to the Orico's 4000GB, making the Orico model much larger in terms of available storage space. Additionally, the Crucial E100 has a Terabytes Written (TBW) rating of 60, significantly lower than the Orico's 2400 TBW, indicating a much higher endurance for the Orico model.

Both products have a 3-year warranty for the Crucial and a 5-year warranty for the Orico, with neither product including an integrated heatsink or RGB lighting. These differences in capacity, durability, and warranty period highlight distinct use cases for each product, with the Orico IG740 Pro offering much higher storage, endurance, and a longer warranty period.

Comparison Summary

This is a specification comparison between Crucial E100 480GB and Orico IG740 Pro 4TB. Both products are M2 type NVMe SSDs with TLC storage, use an HMB (Host Memory Buffer) for cache, support PCIe version 4, have 4 controller channels, and neither has an integrated heatsink or RGB lighting. The sequential read speed is 4700 MB/s on Crucial E100 480GB and 7400 MB/s on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB, while the sequential write speed is 2500 MB/s versus 6500 MB/s. The NVMe version is 1.4 on Crucial E100 480GB and 2 on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB. Internal storage is 480GB on Crucial E100 480GB and 4000GB on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB. The controller differs, with Silicon Motion SM2268XT on Crucial E100 480GB and MaxioTech MAP1602A Falcon Lite on Orico IG740 Pro 4TB, and Terabytes Written (TBW) is 60 compared with 2400. Warranty periods are 3 years for Crucial E100 480GB and 5 years for Orico IG740 Pro 4TB.