DJI Osmo 360 VS DJI Osmo Nano

The DJI Osmo 360 and DJI Osmo Nano both feature a touch screen, external memory slot, and waterproof build. However, the Osmo 360 has a slightly larger screen size of 2″ compared to the Nano’s 1.96″. Both devices have the same resolution of 556 x 314 px, ensuring similar display quality.

In terms of storage, both models offer 128GB of internal storage, with no secondary screen or flip-out screen on either product. When it comes to size and weight, the Osmo 360 is notably larger and heavier, with a volume of 179.3583 cm³ and weighing 183 g. In contrast, the Osmo Nano is more compact, with a volume of 47.3298 cm³ and a lighter weight of 52 g.

Temperature tolerance also varies slightly, as the Osmo 360 can operate in a maximum temperature of 45°C, whereas the Osmo Nano has a slightly lower maximum of 40°C. Both products have the same lowest operating temperature of -20°C.

Both the DJI Osmo 360 and DJI Osmo Nano are compatible with Android and iOS devices, ensuring broad device support for users. They also share Bluetooth 5.1 and first-party support for live streaming, as well as the ability to support a remote smartphone. However, the USB specifications differ between the two: the Osmo 360 uses a USB version 0 and does not feature a USB Type-C port, while the Osmo Nano supports USB version 3.1 and includes a USB Type-C port.

In terms of remote control capabilities, both products include this feature, so users can control the devices without direct interaction. Neither product has GPS functionality.

For Wi-Fi support, both products are equipped with Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), ensuring reliable connectivity on various networks.

The DJI Osmo 360 and DJI Osmo Nano both feature rechargeable batteries with a battery level indicator, making it easy to monitor power status. However, there is a difference in battery life and power capacity. The Osmo 360 offers a slightly longer battery life of 1.6 hours, compared to the Osmo Nano’s 1.5 hours. Additionally, the Osmo 360 is equipped with a more powerful 1950 mAh battery, while the Osmo Nano has a smaller 530 mAh battery.

Despite these differences in capacity and runtime, both products include rechargeable batteries, ensuring users can easily power them up for extended use.

The DJI Osmo 360 and DJI Osmo Nano both lack a microphone input and a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning external microphones cannot be connected directly to either device. However, they do differ in the number of built-in microphones. The Osmo 360 is equipped with 4 microphones, while the Osmo Nano has 2 microphones.

Both products offer internal microphone solutions, but the Osmo 360 has a greater microphone count, potentially providing a more nuanced audio capture experience.

The DJI Osmo 360 and DJI Osmo Nano differ significantly in terms of their main camera specifications. The Osmo 360 has a much higher megapixel count at 120 MP, compared to the Osmo Nano’s 35 MP. Both devices feature an adjustable field of view and are equipped with BSI (Backside Illumination) and CMOS sensors for improved image quality. However, the Osmo 360 has a dual-lens main camera, while the Osmo Nano has a single-lens camera.

In terms of aperture, the Osmo 360 boasts a wider f/1.9 aperture, allowing for more light to enter the camera, while the Osmo Nano has a narrower f/2.8 aperture. Both devices do not have a flash, which may affect low-light performance.

The DJI Osmo 360 and DJI Osmo Nano offer impressive videography features, though there are some differences in their capabilities. Both models support 4K video recording with a resolution of 2160p, but the Osmo 360 records at a higher frame rate of 120 fps, compared to the Osmo Nano’s 60 fps. Additionally, the Osmo 360 has a wider field of view at 170°, while the Osmo Nano has a slightly narrower 143° field of view.

Both cameras support timelapse functions, slow-motion video recording, phase-detection autofocus for videos, continuous autofocus, horizon leveling, and a 24p cinema mode, ensuring solid video performance for both. However, the Osmo Nano shoots in raw format, while the Osmo 360 does not. The movie bitrate of the Osmo 360 is also higher at 170 Mbps, compared to the Osmo Nano’s 120 Mbps.

Both devices include AF tracking, but neither comes with a video light to aid in low-light conditions.