DJI Osmo Nano VS Insta360 Go Ultra

The DJI Osmo Nano features a touch screen, whereas the Insta360 Go Ultra does not. Both devices include a display, but only the Osmo Nano offers a touch screen for direct interaction.

When it comes to external memory, both products offer an external memory slot, so you can expand storage as needed. The Osmo Nano is waterproof with a depth rating of 10 meters, while the Go Ultra is water-resistant, also rated for 10 meters of waterproofing, but lacks the same explicit waterproof claim.

In terms of size and weight, the DJI Osmo Nano is slightly larger, with a volume of 47.33 cm³, weight of 52 g, and dimensions of 57.3 mm in width, 28 mm in thickness, and 29.5 mm in height. The Insta360 Go Ultra is a bit more compact, with a volume of 38.47 cm³, weighing 52.9 g, and measuring 46 mm in width, 18.3 mm in thickness, and 45.7 mm in height. Despite the difference in size, the weight is almost identical, with the Osmo Nano being marginally lighter by 0.9 g.

Both the DJI Osmo Nano and Insta360 Go Ultra are compatible with Android and iOS devices. However, the two differ in their Bluetooth versions; the Osmo Nano supports Bluetooth 5.1, while the Go Ultra has Bluetooth 5.4, offering a slightly newer version for potentially improved connectivity.

Both products also support first-party live streaming, and both feature USB Type-C connections. The Osmo Nano, however, uses USB version 3.1, while the Go Ultra supports the older USB version 2. Both products include a remote control and support a remote smartphone, making them convenient for various types of operation.

Neither product has an HDMI output, GPS, or DLNA certification, so there are no significant differences in those areas. Overall, the key distinctions lie in Bluetooth and USB versions, with the Go Ultra having the more recent Bluetooth version, while the Osmo Nano features a faster USB connection.

The DJI Osmo Nano offers a battery life of 1.5 hours, while the Insta360 Go Ultra has a slightly shorter battery life of 1.15 hours. In terms of battery power, the Osmo Nano has a 530 mAh battery, compared to the Go Ultra’s 500 mAh battery, indicating that the Osmo Nano has a slightly larger capacity.

Both products feature rechargeable batteries and include a battery level indicator, so you can easily monitor the remaining power during use. These shared features ensure that users of either device can keep track of battery status and recharge when needed.

While both devices are quite similar in terms of battery features, the Osmo Nano offers a bit more usage time and a larger battery capacity than the Go Ultra, though the difference is not drastic.

Both the DJI Osmo Nano and the Insta360 Go Ultra lack a microphone input and do not feature a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack. These audio-related specs are identical for both devices, so there are no differences in their audio connectivity capabilities.

As a result, neither product provides the option for external microphones or additional audio input devices, which could be a limitation for users who require more advanced audio features.

In conclusion, both products offer the same audio setup with no external microphone or audio jack options.

The DJI Osmo Nano features a 35 MP main camera, while the Insta360 Go Ultra offers a higher 50 MP main camera. Both devices have an adjustable field of view, allowing flexibility in framing shots, and both are equipped with a CMOS sensor for capturing images. The wide apertures are slightly different, with the Osmo Nano having a 2.8f aperture and the Go Ultra offering a marginally wider 2.85f aperture, which may allow for slightly better low-light performance.

Neither device has a dual-lens or multi-lens setup, meaning both rely on a single lens for imaging. Both cameras lack a built-in flash, so additional lighting may be necessary in low-light environments.

Overall, the Go Ultra has a higher megapixel count, while both devices share similar features like the adjustable field of view, CMOS sensor, and lack of flash or multi-lens cameras.

Both the DJI Osmo Nano and the Insta360 Go Ultra offer the same video recording resolution of 2160 x 60 fps, providing high-quality footage at a smooth frame rate. Both devices include similar videography features such as a timelapse function, slow-motion video recording, continuous autofocus during filming, horizon leveling support, and a 24p cinema mode for a cinematic feel.

One key difference between the two is the movie bitrate: the Osmo Nano records at 120 Mbps, while the Go Ultra records at a higher 180 Mbps, potentially offering more detail in its video output. The Osmo Nano also has the capability to shoot raw footage, whereas the Go Ultra does not support raw shooting, which may limit editing flexibility for those who prefer post-processing control.

Both devices feature AF tracking to maintain focus on moving subjects, but neither includes a video light for low-light filming scenarios. Overall, both offer similar features for video recording, with the Go Ultra having a higher bitrate and lacking raw video shooting capabilities.

Both the DJI Osmo Nano and the Insta360 Go Ultra are capable of recording vertical video. This feature ensures that users can create content specifically designed for social media platforms that favor vertical orientation, like Instagram or TikTok.

As both products support vertical video recording, there are no differences between them in this regard.

In conclusion, both devices offer the same vertical video recording capability, making them suitable for users focused on creating vertical-format content.