Doogee Blade GT Pro VS Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB

The Doogee Blade GT Pro and Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB both offer waterproof designs, ensuring protection against water damage. The Doogee Blade GT Pro has a higher Ingress Protection (IP) rating of IP69, while the Poco F7 256GB is rated at IP68, indicating a slightly higher level of water and dust resistance for the Blade GT Pro.

When it comes to weight, the Doogee Blade GT Pro is heavier at 265 g, compared to the Poco F7 256GB, which weighs 215.7 g. In terms of dimensions, the Doogee Blade GT Pro is also larger, measuring 83.5 mm in width, 178.5 mm in height, and 10.5 mm in thickness, while the Poco F7 256GB is narrower at 77.9 mm, shorter at 163.1 mm, and thinner at 8.2 mm.

The volume of the Doogee Blade GT Pro is 156.5 cm³, significantly larger than the Poco F7 256GB, which has a volume of 104.2 cm³. Additionally, the Doogee Blade GT Pro has a rugged build, making it more durable for rough use, whereas the Poco F7 256GB does not feature this rugged design. Neither device is foldable.

The Doogee Blade GT Pro features an LCD IPS display with a 6.72″ screen size, offering a resolution of 1080 x 2400 px and a pixel density of 392 ppi. It has a refresh rate of 120Hz and a touch sampling rate of 240Hz. However, it does not have branded damage-resistant glass, HDR support, or Always-On Display functionality. Its contrast ratio is 1400:1, and it does not support Dolby Vision or have a secondary screen.

On the other hand, the Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB is equipped with an OLED/AMOLED display, measuring 6.83″ with a higher resolution of 1280 x 2772 px and a pixel density of 447 ppi. It shares the same 120Hz refresh rate but offers a significantly faster touch sampling rate of 480Hz. The Poco F7 also features branded damage-resistant glass, HDR10, HDR10+, Always-On Display, and Dolby Vision support, along with an impressive contrast ratio of 8000000:1. Like the Doogee, it lacks a secondary screen.

Both devices have touch screens, but the Poco F7's display technology and additional features like HDR support and higher contrast ratio distinguish it from the Doogee Blade GT Pro, which is limited to more basic display capabilities.

The Doogee Blade GT Pro offers 512GB of internal storage paired with 12GB of RAM. Its chipset, the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, includes a CPU with 2 high-performance cores running at 2.5 GHz and 6 efficiency cores at 2 GHz. The Blade GT Pro’s Geekbench 6 scores are 2291 for multi-core and 884 for single-core performance. The device features an IMG BXM-8-256 GPU with a clock speed of 900 MHz, and its RAM operates at 2750 MHz. It also supports DirectX 12 and has a maximum memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, with a semiconductor size of 6 nm.

In comparison, the Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB comes with 256GB of internal storage, also with 12GB of RAM. It is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset, featuring a much higher CPU speed distribution: 3 cores at 3.01 GHz, 2 cores at 2.8 GHz, 2 cores at 2.02 GHz, and 1 core at 3.21 GHz. The Poco F7 outperforms the Blade GT Pro in Geekbench 6 results, with a multi-core score of 6833 and a single-core score of 2041. The device includes an Adreno 825 GPU with a faster clock speed of 1150 MHz. Its RAM operates at 4800 MHz, and it has a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, with a 4 nm semiconductor size.

Both devices use big.LITTLE technology, support 64-bit processing, have integrated LTE, and are capable of multithreading. The Blade GT Pro has a maximum memory capacity of 16GB, while the Poco F7 can support up to 24GB of RAM. Both devices use DDR5 memory, and both have integrated graphics and support for OpenCL version 2.

The Doogee Blade GT Pro has a triple-camera setup on the rear with 100 MP, 8 MP, and 2 MP sensors, featuring wide apertures of f/1.8, f/2.2, and f/1.8, respectively. It supports phase-detection autofocus for photos and continuous autofocus during video recording, but lacks built-in optical image stabilization (OIS) and optical zoom. Video recording is limited to 1440p at 30 fps, and it supports features like manual exposure, ISO, focus, and white balance, though it doesn't support slow-motion or HDR10 recording. The front camera is a 32 MP sensor without a flash or front-facing LED flash.

The Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB, on the other hand, has a dual-lens rear camera with 50 MP and 8 MP sensors, featuring apertures of f/2.2 and f/1.5. It also supports phase-detection autofocus and continuous autofocus for video. The main difference is that the Poco F7 has built-in OIS and supports video recording at a higher resolution of 2160p at 60 fps, along with slow-motion recording. It offers a RAW shooting mode and a timelapse function, which the Blade GT Pro lacks. The front camera is 20 MP, also without a front-facing LED flash.

Both devices offer similar features such as manual exposure, ISO, focus, and white balance, along with the ability to create panoramas in-camera. However, the Poco F7 has more advanced video recording options, a higher front camera resolution, and additional creative options like slow-motion and timelapse, while the Blade GT Pro focuses more on basic functionality.

The Doogee Blade GT Pro runs on Android 14 and includes several privacy and customization features, such as clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy settings. It also offers theme customization, the ability to block app tracking, and notification permissions. The Blade GT Pro supports dark mode, media picker, split-screen functionality, and PiP (Picture-in-Picture). Additionally, it has features like offline voice recognition, voice commands, and the ability to track the current position of the device. However, it lacks Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, app offloading, direct OS updates, and Quick Start.

The Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB operates on Android 15, offering similar features to the Blade GT Pro, such as clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy settings, and theme customization. It also supports blocking app tracking, notification permissions, dark mode, media picker, and split screen. However, the Poco F7 adds Wi-Fi password sharing and the ability to offload apps, which the Blade GT Pro does not support. Like the Blade GT Pro, the Poco F7 lacks focus modes and direct OS updates, but both devices have similar voice recognition and position tracking capabilities. The Poco F7 runs a slightly newer Android version (Android 15) compared to the Blade GT Pro's Android 14.

Both devices include advanced features like multi-user support, customizable notifications, and Live Text, as well as offline voice recognition. However, the Poco F7 benefits from Android 15's improvements, including Wi-Fi password sharing and app offloading, which are not available on the Blade GT Pro. Neither device has Quick Start functionality.

The Doogee Blade GT Pro is equipped with a 5800 mAh battery, supporting fast charging at a speed of 18W. It does not offer wireless charging or a removable battery, but it does have a battery level indicator and a rechargeable battery. The Blade GT Pro lacks features like wireless charging and a removable battery, but it ensures users can easily monitor battery levels.

The Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB has a larger 6500 mAh battery, providing faster 90W charging. Like the Blade GT Pro, it does not support wireless charging or offer a removable battery. However, the Poco F7’s battery is larger and supports a much faster charging speed compared to the 18W offered by the Blade GT Pro.

Both devices have rechargeable batteries, battery level indicators, and lack wireless charging capabilities. The main difference is in battery power and charging speed, with the Poco F7 offering a more powerful battery and significantly faster charging capabilities than the Blade GT Pro.

The Doogee Blade GT Pro does not have a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack or stereo speakers, and it does not support any advanced Bluetooth audio codecs such as aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. However, it does have a built-in radio feature, allowing users to listen to FM radio.

In contrast, the Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB also lacks a 3.5 mm audio jack, but it does include stereo speakers for better audio quality. Additionally, the Poco F7 supports several high-quality Bluetooth audio codecs, including aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, although it does not support aptX Lossless. Unlike the Blade GT Pro, the Poco F7 does not have a radio feature.

Both devices lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, but the Poco F7 offers superior audio capabilities, including stereo speakers and support for multiple Bluetooth audio codecs. The Blade GT Pro, however, stands out with its radio functionality.

Both the Doogee Blade GT Pro and the Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB support 5G connectivity and feature dual SIM card slots. However, the Poco F7 supports an extended range of Wi-Fi versions, including Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), whereas the Blade GT Pro is limited to Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5. The download speed of the Poco F7 is significantly faster at 4200 MBits/s, compared to the Blade GT Pro's 2770 MBits/s.

Both devices come with Bluetooth 5.2 (for the Blade GT Pro) and Bluetooth 6 (for the Poco F7), and both include NFC support. Additionally, both phones feature USB Type-C ports with USB version 2, fingerprint scanners, GPS, and a compass. Neither device offers an external memory slot or a removable battery, and both are equipped with accelerometers and cellular modules. Neither device has an infrared sensor, a barometer, an HDMI output, or a built-in projector.

In terms of sensors, both devices support Galileo, but only the Poco F7 includes an infrared sensor. Both the Blade GT Pro and Poco F7 lack features like motion tracking, optical tracking, 3D facial recognition, and iris scanning. The Blade GT Pro lacks Wi-Fi password sharing, while the Poco F7 does not have emergency SOS via satellite or crash detection.

Both the Doogee Blade GT Pro and the Xiaomi Poco F7 256GB feature a video light, but neither device includes sapphire glass display protection, has a curved display, or uses an e-paper display. All these specifications are the same for both models, with no differences between them in this group.

In summary, both devices offer a video light and share the same display technologies, lacking advanced features like sapphire glass or curved/e-paper displays.