Doogee Tab G6 VS Doogee U11 Pro

In terms of design, the Doogee Tab G6 and Doogee U11 Pro are remarkably similar, sharing the same fundamental build philosophy. Both lack a stylus, detachable keyboard, backlit keyboard, tilt sensitivity, and any form of water resistance — meaning neither tablet is aimed at creative professionals or users who need durability in wet environments.

The only measurable differences lie in physical dimensions: the U11 Pro is marginally lighter at 537 g versus 554 g, and slightly thinner at 7.9 mm compared to 8.1 mm. In practice, a 17 g weight difference is barely perceptible during typical use, though it could matter slightly during extended handheld sessions. The 0.2 mm thickness gap is effectively invisible to the touch.

Overall, the two tablets are nearly identical from a design standpoint. The U11 Pro holds a very marginal edge in portability, but the gap is so small that it should not be a deciding factor for most users. If design is your primary concern, consider these products essentially tied.

The display specifications for the Doogee Tab G6 and Doogee U11 Pro are functionally identical. Both feature an 11-inch IPS LCD panel running at 1280 x 800 resolution with a 90Hz refresh rate — and the pixel density difference of 138 ppi versus 137 ppi is so negligible it is imperceptible to the human eye.

The 90Hz refresh rate is a welcome inclusion at this tier, lending noticeably smoother scrolling and more fluid UI animations compared to standard 60Hz panels. However, the 1280 x 800 resolution on an 11-inch screen yields a relatively low pixel density overall, meaning text and fine details will appear softer than on higher-resolution competitors. Neither tablet supports HDR10, Dolby Vision, or damage-resistant glass, which caps their suitability for media-focused or heavy-use scenarios.

This category is a clear tie. The two tablets deliver an essentially identical visual experience, with no meaningful distinction between them on any display metric that matters in daily use.

Beneath their near-identical exteriors, the Doogee Tab G6 and Doogee U11 Pro diverge meaningfully in raw processing power. The Tab G6 runs on the Unisoc T7250, whose two performance cores clock in at 1.8 GHz — versus the T7200 in the U11 Pro, where all cores are capped at 1.6 GHz. That advantage is confirmed by the Geekbench 6 results: the Tab G6 scores 437 (single-core) and 1461 (multi-core), compared to 371 and 1391 for the U11 Pro. The single-core gap is particularly significant, as most everyday tasks — app launches, UI responsiveness, web browsing — rely heavily on single-threaded performance.

The GPU picture tells a similar story. The Tab G6's Mali G57 runs at 850 MHz with 2 execution units, while the U11 Pro's variant operates at only 650 MHz with a single execution unit. Combined with the Tab G6's faster 1866 MHz RAM versus the U11 Pro's 1600 MHz, the Tab G6 should deliver a noticeably snappier experience in graphics-light gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. The U11 Pro does counter with a higher maximum RAM ceiling of 14 GB versus 12 GB, though at the base 6 GB both ship with, this advantage is theoretical rather than immediate.

The Tab G6 holds a clear performance edge in this category. Across CPU speed, GPU clock, and benchmark scores, it consistently outpaces the U11 Pro — and for users prioritizing day-to-day snappiness, that lead is real and measurable.

Camera hardware is where the Doogee U11 Pro pulls ahead most visibly. Its 13 MP main shooter offers a meaningful resolution advantage over the Tab G6's 8 MP sensor — more pixels translate to finer detail in stills and greater cropping flexibility. The U11 Pro also records video at 1080p 60 fps versus the Tab G6's 1080p 30 fps, which results in noticeably smoother footage, particularly for fast-moving subjects.

The Tab G6 does claw back one point: it supports slow-motion video recording, a feature absent on the U11 Pro. For users who occasionally want to capture slow-motion clips, this is a genuine differentiator. Elsewhere, the two tablets are evenly matched — both share a 5 MP front camera, HDR mode, touch autofocus, continuous autofocus during recording, and a comparable set of manual controls including ISO, white balance, focus, and exposure.

On balance, the U11 Pro holds the camera edge, driven by its higher-resolution sensor and smoother 60 fps video output. The Tab G6's slow-motion capability is a notable consolation, but for users who prioritize photo quality and fluid video, the U11 Pro is the stronger choice in this category.

Audio hardware is largely a wash between the two tablets. Both the Doogee Tab G6 and Doogee U11 Pro include stereo speakers and a 3.5 mm headphone jack — a combination that is increasingly rare at this price tier and genuinely useful for wired headphone users. Neither device supports any high-quality Bluetooth audio codec such as aptX, LDAC, or their variants, which means wireless audio is limited to standard SBC or AAC quality.

The one distinguishing feature here is the U11 Pro's inclusion of a built-in FM radio — an old-school but practical addition for users who want access to local broadcasts without consuming mobile data or relying on streaming services. It is a niche feature, but in markets where FM radio remains widely used, it adds tangible value.

For most users the two tablets are evenly matched on audio. The U11 Pro earns a narrow edge solely due to its FM radio capability — a minor but exclusive feature that the Tab G6 simply does not offer.

Battery capacity is one area where the two tablets diverge just enough to be worth noting. The Doogee U11 Pro packs an 8580 mAh cell versus the 8000 mAh in the Tab G6 — a difference of 580 mAh, or roughly 7%. On an identical display and chipset platform, that margin could translate to anywhere from 30 minutes to an hour of additional screen-on time depending on usage patterns, which is a meaningful but not dramatic real-world gap.

Both tablets support fast charging and share the same fundamental battery architecture — sealed, rechargeable, non-removable. Neither offers wireless charging, so there are no additional convenience features to differentiate them on that front.

The U11 Pro holds a modest but genuine edge in this category. A larger battery is an unambiguous advantage all else being equal, and while 580 mAh is not a transformative difference, users who prioritize longevity between charges will find the U11 Pro the more capable option.

Across the broad sweep of connectivity and software features, these two tablets are remarkably well-matched — but three specific differences are worth examining closely. Most significantly, the Doogee Tab G6 includes a cellular module while the U11 Pro does not. This means the Tab G6 can connect to mobile networks independently, functioning without a Wi-Fi network — a practical advantage for users who need internet access on the go. The U11 Pro, by contrast, is Wi-Fi only, tethering it to hotspots or home networks.

The U11 Pro counters with built-in GPS, which the Tab G6 lacks. Dedicated GPS enables accurate standalone navigation and location services without relying on network-based positioning, making the U11 Pro more capable for mapping and location-aware applications. The Tab G6 does still track device position, but without a dedicated GPS chip. There is also a minor upload speed difference — 150 Mbits/s on the Tab G6 versus 100 Mbits/s on the U11 Pro — though in everyday use this gap is rarely felt. All other connectivity specs, including Wi-Fi version, Bluetooth 5, and the full suite of software privacy and multitasking features, are identical.

This category comes down to use case. Users who need untethered mobile connectivity will find the Tab G6 the more versatile choice, while those who prioritize location accuracy and navigation should lean toward the U11 Pro. Neither product holds an outright overall edge — it is a meaningful trade-off rather than a clear winner.

The Geekbench 5 results in this group reinforce what the Geekbench 6 scores already suggested in the Performance category. The Doogee Tab G6 leads with a single-core score of 357 and a multi-core score of 1350, while the U11 Pro trails at 313 single-core and 1175 multi-core. The single-core gap of roughly 14% is the more telling figure, as it reflects the Tab G6's faster performance cores in tasks that cannot be parallelized — which covers the majority of typical daily interactions.

Both tablets use DDR4 memory, meaning there is no architectural difference in memory type to account for any performance variation. The benchmark gap is therefore a direct reflection of the chipset differences already identified, and these Geekbench 5 results serve as consistent corroboration across two separate benchmark suites.

The Tab G6 is the clear winner here. With leads in both single- and multi-core results across Geekbench 5, its processing advantage over the U11 Pro is not an anomaly — it is a consistent and reproducible pattern.