EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus VS Soundpeats Air 5 Pro

In terms of physical design, the EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus and the Soundpeats Air 5 Pro are nearly identical on paper: both are true wireless, in-ear earbuds with no neckband, no wingtips, no RGB lighting, no display, and stereo speaker configurations. For most users, the day-to-day wearing experience will feel comparable across both.

The one meaningful differentiator in this category is the ingress protection rating. The EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus carries an IP55 rating, while the Soundpeats Air 5 Pro is rated IPX5. Both share the same ″5″ dust/water resistance on the water axis — meaning both can handle sweat and rain splashes confidently — but the EarFun's full IP55 rating adds a dust-resistance dimension that the Soundpeats′ ″X″ designation leaves untested. In practice, this matters most in dusty or outdoor environments where particulate exposure is a concern.

Overall, these two earbuds are virtually tied in design, but the EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus holds a narrow edge thanks to its certified dust resistance, making it the slightly more robust choice for active or outdoor use cases.

When it comes to sound quality specs, these two earbuds are a perfect mirror of each other. Both feature a 10 mm dynamic driver, cover the full standard human hearing range of 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, and include both active and passive noise cancellation — a combination that addresses sound isolation at both the hardware and software level.

Neither earbud supports spatial audio, Dolby Atmos, Dirac Virtuo, or a neodymium magnet. The absence of spatial audio and premium audio processing formats means neither product is targeting an immersive or cinematic listening experience on paper. The lack of a confirmed neodymium magnet is a minor note — most modern drivers use neodymium by default, so its omission from the spec sheet likely reflects incomplete disclosure rather than an actual hardware difference.

This group is a clear tie. Every measurable sound quality specification is identical across both products, and no single data point gives either the EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus or the Soundpeats Air 5 Pro a meaningful edge here. A buying decision between these two will need to hinge on other spec groups entirely.

Battery life is where these two earbuds diverge most sharply. The EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus delivers 12 hours of earbud playtime backed by a case that extends total listening to 42 hours, while the Soundpeats Air 5 Pro offers 7.5 hours per charge with a case topping out at 29.5 hours. That gap — roughly 60% more earbud runtime and over 40% more total system battery — is substantial in real-world terms. The EarFun can comfortably survive a long-haul flight or a full workday on a single charge; the Soundpeats would require a case top-up in the same scenario.

Both earbuds share an identical 1.5-hour charge time, so neither has a speed advantage when it comes to refilling the case. Where the EarFun pulls further ahead, though, is the addition of wireless charging — a convenience the Soundpeats Air 5 Pro lacks entirely. For users who already use a Qi pad on their desk or nightstand, this means one fewer cable to manage.

The EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus wins this category decisively. It offers meaningfully longer runtime at both the earbud and system level, and the inclusion of wireless charging adds a practical everyday convenience that the Soundpeats simply cannot match.

Both earbuds share a strong codec foundation — LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, AAC, and Bluetooth LE Audio are all present on each device, covering virtually every high-quality wireless audio path a modern smartphone or DAP can offer. The shared 10 m Bluetooth range and USB-C charging port also put them on equal footing for everyday use.

The differentiators, however, favor the EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus in meaningful ways. Its Bluetooth 6 implementation is a generational step ahead of the Soundpeats′ Bluetooth 5.4 — BT 6 introduces improved channel sounding for more precise connectivity and lays the groundwork for lower latency and better interference handling in crowded wireless environments. The EarFun also supports Auracast, a broadcast audio standard built on LE Audio that allows sharing audio streams to multiple listeners simultaneously — a forward-looking feature absent on the Soundpeats. Add fast pairing on the EarFun side, and the day-to-day connection experience is noticeably more seamless. The Soundpeats′ exclusive addition of base aptX is technically redundant given both devices already support the superior aptX Adaptive.

The EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus takes a clear win here. The newer Bluetooth version, Auracast support, and fast pairing collectively represent a more future-proof and user-friendly connectivity package than what the Soundpeats Air 5 Pro offers.

Across the features category, these two earbuds are largely identical — both offer ambient sound mode, fast charging, a mute function, on-device controls, voice prompts, and even a travel bag included in the box. For the vast majority of daily use cases, either earbud delivers the same functional toolkit.

The single differentiator is in/on-ear detection, which the EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus supports and the Soundpeats Air 5 Pro does not. This sensor automatically pauses playback when an earbud is removed and resumes when it is reinserted — a small but genuinely useful quality-of-life feature that eliminates the need to manually pause audio every time you take an earbud out for a conversation or a moment of situational awareness.

The EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus edges ahead in this category solely on the strength of its ear detection capability. It is a narrow advantage, but for users who frequently take earbuds in and out throughout the day, it is a practical convenience the Soundpeats Air 5 Pro simply cannot replicate.

Neither earbud holds any advantage here. Both the EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus and the Soundpeats Air 5 Pro pack 6 microphones and feature noise-canceling microphone technology — a configuration that, across the industry, typically enables beamforming arrays to isolate the speaker's voice while suppressing wind, crowd, and ambient noise during calls.

This is a tie. With identical microphone counts and the same noise-canceling capability on both sides, the microphone specs alone give no basis for choosing one over the other. Real-world call quality differences, if any exist, would come down to the signal processing software each brand employs — which falls outside the scope of the provided data.