Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone VS iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac

The Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac both come equipped with a HEPA filter and an allergy filter, making them suitable for users with sensitivities. Both are compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa for voice control, so they integrate well into smart home systems. However, the Ecovacs model operates at a higher noise level, producing 65.7 dB, while the iRobot Roomba operates more quietly at 60 dB.

In terms of weight, the Deebot X11 OmniCyclone is noticeably heavier at 5000 g compared to the Roomba's 3400 g, which could affect portability and ease of handling. The dimensions are also slightly different; the Deebot is 353 mm in width, 98 mm in height, and 351 mm in thickness, while the Roomba is slightly more compact at 345 mm in width, 104 mm in height, and 350 mm in thickness.

Both robots have a similar warranty period of one year. The Deebot X11 OmniCyclone has an impressive estimated empty time of 150 days, significantly longer than the Roomba’s 75 days. The docking stations are also different in size; the Deebot’s docking station is much larger at 87113.1 cm³, while the Roomba’s is smaller at 10624.44 cm³.

The Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac share a very similar set of features, with both models supporting no-go zones, virtual barriers, obstacle sensors, and route mapping. Both are also self-emptying, have anti-fall sensors, and can be scheduled to clean automatically. Additionally, neither product comes with a remote control, though both support a remote smartphone for control.

Both products also support Wi-Fi, using the same version, Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n). Each has mop cleaning capabilities, along with mop raising and drying features, which adds extra functionality for users looking for multi-surface cleaning. Voice prompts are available on both models as well, ensuring a user-friendly experience.

There are no significant differences between the two in this feature group; the specifications are identical across the board for both the Ecovacs and iRobot models.

The Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac have some differences in their design features. The Deebot has a dustbin capacity of 0.3 l, while the Roomba offers a slightly larger dustbin at 0.38 l. The Deebot includes washable filters, while the Roomba does not, which could affect maintenance needs over time.

Neither product features a display or twin side brushes, and both models automatically adjust their height in different ways—while the Deebot does this automatically, the Roomba does not. The Roomba also has an indicator to show when its dustbin is full, but the Deebot does not have this feature.

These differences in design may influence user experience in terms of cleaning efficiency and ease of maintenance, depending on which features are most important to you.

The Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac share many cleaning capabilities, including the ability to clean all floor types, offer four cleaning modes, and mop. Both also feature a dirt sensor to detect and focus on areas with more dirt. However, the Deebot has a significantly higher suction power at 19500 Pa, compared to the Roomba's 13000 Pa, which may impact its cleaning performance on tougher messes.

Neither model includes UV light, so neither provides that specific sanitation feature. Overall, the key difference in cleaning power between the two is the suction power, with the Deebot offering more intense suction.

These products provide similar cleaning modes and floor compatibility, but the Deebot’s higher suction power could result in a more powerful cleaning performance overall.

The Ecovacs Deebot X11 OmniCyclone and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac differ in several aspects of their power specifications. The Deebot has a larger battery capacity of 6400 mAh compared to the Roomba's 5000 mAh, potentially allowing it to last longer on a single charge. However, the Roomba offers a slightly longer runtime at 210 minutes, while the Deebot runs for 200 minutes.

In terms of charging, the Deebot takes 3 hours to fully charge, while the Roomba requires 4 hours. The Deebot also consumes more power, with an operating power consumption of 110W, whereas the Roomba consumes just 33W. Both models include an auto-off feature, which helps conserve energy when the cleaning task is complete.

Overall, the Deebot offers a larger battery and faster charge time, but the Roomba provides a slightly longer runtime and much lower power consumption.