Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni VS iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac

Both the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac come with a HEPA filter and an allergy filter, making them suitable for allergy sufferers. The Ecovacs model has an audible noise level of 65.7 dB, while the iRobot Roomba is quieter at 60 dB.

In terms of size, the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni is more compact with a width of 353 mm, height of 59.8 mm, and thickness of 351.5 mm. It has a total volume of 7419.95 cm³. The iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac, on the other hand, is slightly larger, with a width of 345 mm, height of 104 mm, and thickness of 350 mm, giving it a volume of 12558 cm³.

Both models are compatible with Google Assistant and Alexa, and they each come with a 1-year warranty. The Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni has a lighter weight of 1500 g compared to the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac's 3400 g. The Ecovacs model also has a much longer estimated empty time of 150 days, while the iRobot Roomba's is 75 days. Additionally, the docking station size for the Ecovacs is larger at 46644 cm³, compared to the iRobot's 10624.44 cm³.

Both the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac come with a comprehensive set of features, including mapping, no-go zones, obstacle sensors, and support for virtual barriers. They also both have route mapping, voice prompts, auto docking, anti-fall sensors, and the ability to be scheduled. Additionally, neither product includes a remote control, although both support Wi-Fi and operate on Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).

The Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac both support mop cleaning, mop raising, and mop drying, offering similar functionality in this regard. The major difference lies in the self-emptying feature. The iRobot Roomba is self-emptying, while the Ecovacs model is not.

In terms of design and usability, both models share a range of features aimed at improving efficiency and ease of use, such as the obstacle sensor and the ability to prevent getting stuck. However, the self-emptying feature of the iRobot gives it an edge in terms of convenience for longer-term maintenance, which the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni lacks.

The Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac both feature a similar dustbin capacity, with the Deebot having a 0.3 l capacity and the iRobot slightly larger at 0.38 l. Neither model has a display, twin side brushes, or included washable filters. Both also do not automatically adjust their height.

One key difference between the two models is that the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac indicates when its dustbin is full, whereas the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni does not have this feature.

Overall, the design specifications of both models are quite similar, with the primary distinction being the iRobot's ability to notify users when the dustbin is full, which could be useful for maintenance.

Both the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac are designed to clean all floor types and feature four cleaning modes. Both also include mopping functionality and have a dirt sensor, enhancing their cleaning efficiency. Neither product, however, has UV light for additional sanitation.

One key difference between the two models is suction power. The Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni offers a higher suction power at 16600 Pa, compared to the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac's 13000 Pa. This indicates that the Deebot X9 Pro Omni may be slightly more effective at picking up dirt and debris.

Overall, while both models offer similar cleaning features, the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni has the advantage in suction power, which could potentially result in a more powerful clean, especially for larger debris or more challenging dirt.

The Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni and the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac both feature auto-off functionality, ensuring energy efficiency when not in use. In terms of battery power, the Deebot X9 Pro Omni has a larger battery at 6400 mAh, compared to the Roomba Max 705 Vac's 5000 mAh. This could potentially offer the Deebot more power for longer cleaning sessions.

When it comes to runtime, the iRobot Roomba Max 705 Vac lasts slightly longer at 210 minutes, while the Ecovacs Deebot X9 Pro Omni runs for 200 minutes. Despite the Deebot's larger battery, the Roomba achieves a slightly longer runtime.

Charging time also differs between the two products. The Deebot X9 Pro Omni charges in 3 hours, whereas the Roomba Max 705 Vac requires 4 hours for a full charge. Additionally, the Deebot consumes more power during operation at 110W, while the Roomba uses only 33W. This difference suggests that while the Roomba may be more energy-efficient, the Deebot offers higher power consumption for potentially greater performance.