Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC VS Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 16GB

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 16GB show some key differences in their performance specs. The GPU clock speed of the Gainward is 2280 MHz, while the Zotac runs at a slightly higher 2407 MHz. For GPU turbo, the Gainward can reach 2580 MHz, whereas the Zotac can go up to 2632 MHz. This gives the Zotac a slight edge in terms of base and boosted clock speeds.

When it comes to pixel rate, the Zotac performs at 126.3 GPixel/s, a bit higher than the Gainward's 123.8 GPixel/s. The floating-point performance of the Zotac is also stronger, reaching 24.26 TFLOPS compared to the Gainward's 19.81 TFLOPS. The texture rate is also noticeably higher for the Zotac at 379 GTexels/s, compared to 309.6 GTexels/s on the Gainward.

Both products have the same GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz and the same number of render output units (ROPs), with both offering 48. The Gainward has 3840 shading units, whereas the Zotac has 4608 shading units, providing a larger processing power for the Zotac. Additionally, both cards have Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) support, which is an important feature for certain compute tasks.

The memory specifications for the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 16GB are quite similar in many respects. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, and they both offer a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. Additionally, both use GDDR7 memory, and each has a 128-bit memory bus width.

However, there is a key difference between the two models when it comes to VRAM. The Gainward comes with 8GB of VRAM, while the Zotac offers 16GB of VRAM, which is double the amount found in the Gainward.

Both cards also support ECC memory, ensuring error correction capabilities, which is useful for stability during heavy computational tasks.

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 16GB share many common features. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, ensuring compatibility with modern gaming and creative applications. They also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D, and DLSS, offering a range of advanced visual enhancements and multitasking capabilities.

Both models feature Intel Resizable BAR support, ensuring better performance in certain workloads. Neither product includes XeSS (XMX), which is not a feature on either card. They also both lack LHR (Lite Hash Rate) support, meaning they are not restricted for cryptocurrency mining tasks.

The main difference between the two lies in the RGB lighting feature. The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC comes with RGB lighting, adding a customizable aesthetic element, whereas the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 16GB does not include RGB lighting. Both cards support up to four displays for an immersive multi-monitor setup.

The port configurations on the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 16GB are identical. Both cards feature an HDMI output with one HDMI port, supporting HDMI 2.1b. Additionally, both have three DisplayPort outputs, providing ample connectivity for multiple monitors. Neither card includes USB-C ports, DVI outputs, nor mini DisplayPort outputs.

In summary, both products offer the same set of video outputs, ensuring similar display connectivity options for users.

Both the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC and the Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 16GB feature the same GPU architecture, Blackwell, and share the same semiconductor size of 5 nm, along with the same number of transistors at 21,900 million. Both also use PCI Express (PCIe) version 5, ensuring fast data transfer speeds. Neither card includes air-water cooling systems, relying on their standard cooling solutions.

In terms of power consumption, the Gainward has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 145W, while the Zotac model has a higher TDP of 180W, which suggests the Zotac may require more power for operation. The physical dimensions also differ slightly: the Gainward is 291.9 mm wide and 116.5 mm high, while the Zotac is smaller, measuring 220.5 mm in width and 120.3 mm in height.

Overall, while both cards share many key technical specs, the Zotac has a higher power requirement and is slightly more compact in size compared to the Gainward.