Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC VS Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 8GB

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC and Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 8GB differ in various key performance specs. In terms of GPU clock speed, the Gainward card has a base clock of 2280 MHz, while the Zotac card has a slightly higher base clock of 2407 MHz. Both GPUs feature a turbo mode, with the Gainward reaching 2580 MHz and the Zotac pushing 2632 MHz.

For pixel rate, the Gainward delivers 123.8 GPixel/s, while the Zotac offers a higher rate of 126.3 GPixel/s. Similarly, the floating-point performance is noticeably higher on the Zotac at 24.26 TFLOPS compared to the Gainward’s 19.81 TFLOPS. The texture rate also reflects this, with the Gainward at 309.6 GTexels/s and the Zotac at 379 GTexels/s.

Both GPUs have the same GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz, as well as 48 render output units (ROPs). The Gainward card has 3840 shading units and 120 texture mapping units (TMUs), while the Zotac card outperforms in both categories with 4608 shading units and 144 TMUs. Both products support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP).

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC and Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 8GB share identical memory specifications. Both cards have an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s, and 8GB of VRAM. Additionally, both feature GDDR7 memory and a memory bus width of 128-bit.

Both cards also support ECC memory (Error-Correcting Code), ensuring data integrity during high-performance tasks. Since the memory specs are identical between these two models, there is no difference in terms of raw memory performance or capabilities.

Overall, these two GPUs are equally matched in terms of memory configuration, offering the same performance potential in this area.

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC and Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 8GB share many key features, with a few notable differences. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and applications. They also both support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D, and DLSS for enhanced graphics and performance.

Additionally, both cards support Intel Resizable BAR (AMD SAM is not mentioned for either), and neither card includes LHR (Lite Hash Rate) limitations. One difference between the two is in RGB lighting: the Gainward model features RGB lighting, while the Zotac card does not. Both cards support up to four displays.

For features, there is no other significant difference between the two models; both offer a similar set of capabilities with only the RGB lighting setting them apart.

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC and Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 8GB offer identical port configurations. Both cards feature one HDMI output with HDMI 2.1b support, three DisplayPort outputs, and no USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs. This ensures that both models provide the same level of connectivity for displays.

In terms of the number and types of ports, there is no difference between the two products. Both support up to four displays via their HDMI and DisplayPort connections.

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Python III OC and Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti AMP 8GB share some similarities but differ in a few key general specifications. Both cards use the Blackwell GPU architecture, have a 5 nm semiconductor size, and feature the same number of transistors—21,900 million. They also both support PCI Express 5.0 and lack air-water cooling solutions.

In terms of power consumption, the Gainward model has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 145W, while the Zotac card has a higher TDP of 180W. The size of the cards also varies, with the Gainward being larger at 291.9 mm in width and 116.5 mm in height, compared to the Zotac’s 220.5 mm in width and 120.3 mm in height.

Overall, the two models share most of their core specifications, but the Zotac card has a higher TDP and is slightly smaller in size compared to the Gainward model.