Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB VS Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PythoN III 16GB

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PythoN III 16GB both share identical performance specifications. Both models feature a GPU clock speed of 2407 MHz, with a turbo boost up to 2572 MHz. Their pixel rate is the same at 123.5 GPixel/s, and both deliver a floating-point performance of 23.7 TFLOPS. Additionally, the texture rate for both cards is 370.4 GTexels/s. The GPU memory speed for both is 1750 MHz, with identical configurations in terms of shading units (4608), texture mapping units (TMUs) at 144, and render output units (ROPs) at 48.

Both cards also include support for Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), providing similar computational capabilities in terms of floating-point calculations. In conclusion, there are no differences in the performance specifications between the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PythoN III 16GB within this group.

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PythoN III 16GB share several memory specifications. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. They also use GDDR7 memory and have a memory bus width of 128-bit. Additionally, both models support ECC memory, which ensures data integrity during operations.

The key difference between the two models lies in the amount of VRAM. The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB is equipped with 8GB of VRAM, whereas the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PythoN III 16GB offers 16GB of VRAM, providing double the memory capacity compared to the Ghost 8GB.

Aside from this difference in VRAM, all other memory-related specifications are identical between the two products.

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PythoN III 16GB share nearly identical features. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, making them compatible with a wide range of modern applications. They also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, as well as DLSS, for enhanced gaming performance and visual fidelity. Both models also feature Intel Resizable BAR support (AMD SAM / Intel Resizable BAR) and do not have LHR (Lite Hash Rate) limitations, which is beneficial for users interested in cryptocurrency mining.

The only difference between the two cards in this group is the presence of RGB lighting. The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB includes RGB lighting, while the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PythoN III 16GB does not. Aside from this, both models support up to 4 displays.

In summary, both models offer the same feature set, with the exception of the RGB lighting found only in the Ghost 8GB model.

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PythoN III 16GB have identical port configurations. Both models feature 1 HDMI output with HDMI 2.1b support and 3 DisplayPort outputs. Neither card has any USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs. As a result, the connectivity options are the same for both cards, offering a total of four display outputs with no differences in terms of port types or numbers.

In summary, there are no distinctions in the ports between the two models; both offer the same port setup and display connectivity features.

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PythoN III 16GB share several key specifications in terms of general architecture and design. Both cards are based on the Blackwell GPU architecture, use a 5 nm semiconductor size, and have the same number of transistors at 21,900 million. Additionally, both models have the same Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 180W and support PCI Express version 5.

The main differences between the two cards are in their physical dimensions. The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB has a width of 262.1 mm and a height of 126.3 mm, while the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti PythoN III 16GB is slightly wider at 291.9 mm but shorter in height at 116.5 mm. Neither card features air-water cooling.

Overall, the two models are quite similar in terms of their internal architecture and power requirements, with the only notable difference being the size and shape of the cards.