Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB VS Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB

When comparing the performance of the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB, there are several notable differences in their specs. Both cards feature a GPU clock speed around 2400 MHz, but the Gainward model has a slightly higher base clock at 2407 MHz compared to the Inno3D's 2235 MHz. The Inno3D, however, has a higher GPU turbo speed of 2602 MHz, exceeding the Gainward's turbo clock of 2572 MHz.

In terms of pixel rate, the Inno3D card leads with 124.9 GPixel/s, slightly outperforming the Gainward at 123.5 GPixel/s. The floating-point performance is similarly close, with the Inno3D delivering 23.98 TFLOPS versus the Gainward's 23.7 TFLOPS. Both cards are very similar in terms of texture rate, with the Inno3D clocking in at 374.7 GTexels/s and the Gainward at 370.4 GTexels/s.

Both products share the same GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz, and they have identical counts for shading units (4608), texture mapping units (144), and render output units (48). Both cards also support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), which is a feature the Gainward and Inno3D models have in common.

The memory specifications of the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB are quite similar, though there are some key differences. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s, so performance in these areas is identical between the two models.

One major difference is in VRAM: the Gainward card has 8GB of VRAM, while the Inno3D card is equipped with 16GB of VRAM. This gives the Inno3D model double the memory capacity of the Gainward.

Both models use GDDR7 memory and have the same 128-bit memory bus width, so there is no distinction in terms of memory technology or bus architecture. Additionally, both products support ECC (Error Correction Code) memory, ensuring a high level of memory reliability on both cards.

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB are both packed with similar features, with a few key differences. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, so they’re equipped with the latest API support for high-performance gaming and applications. They also both support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D, and DLSS, offering robust graphics performance for modern gaming and creative tasks.

In terms of design and extra features, the Gainward card comes with RGB lighting, whereas the Inno3D model does not feature RGB lighting. Both cards support Intel Resizable BAR (part of the AMD SAM / Intel Resizable BAR feature set) and do not have LHR (Lite Hash Rate) for cryptocurrency mining restrictions.

When it comes to display support, both cards can handle up to 4 displays, offering ample output for multi-monitor setups. However, the Gainward model is the only one in this comparison that includes RGB lighting, providing an added visual flair for users who prioritize aesthetics in their build.

Both the Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB offer similar connectivity options. Both cards are equipped with 1 HDMI output, featuring the same HDMI 2.1b version for high-quality video and audio output.

Both products also come with 3 DisplayPort outputs, providing ample options for multi-monitor setups. Neither card includes any USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs, making the available ports quite similar across both models.

In summary, the ports on these two cards are identical, with both offering the same HDMI and DisplayPort configuration and lacking additional port options like USB-C or DVI.

The Gainward GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Ghost 8GB and Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 OC 16GB share many similarities in their general specifications. Both cards are based on the Blackwell GPU architecture, have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 180W, and support PCI Express (PCIe) version 5. They also both use a 5 nm semiconductor size and feature the same number of transistors, with 21,900 million transistors each.

In terms of cooling, neither card offers air-water cooling, as both lack this feature. The main physical difference between the two products is their size. The Gainward card measures 262.1 mm in width and 126.3 mm in height, while the Inno3D model is slightly smaller, with a width of 250 mm and a height of 116 mm.

Overall, these two cards are nearly identical in terms of their core specifications, with the only notable difference being their size, where the Inno3D card is more compact compared to the Gainward model.