At the heart of the performance gap between these two cards lies a fundamental difference in GPU silicon. The Gigabyte RTX 5070 Ti Gaming OC is built on a significantly larger chip, featuring 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs compared to the Gainward Phoenix-S's 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. This translates directly into raw compute throughput: the 5070 Ti delivers 46.38 TFLOPS of floating-point performance versus 31.6 TFLOPS on the Phoenix-S — a roughly 47% advantage that will be felt in GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming, ray tracing, and AI-accelerated rendering.
The clock speed story is more nuanced. The Gainward Phoenix-S actually runs a higher base clock at 2,325 MHz versus the 5070 Ti's 2,295 MHz, while the 5070 Ti edges ahead in turbo at 2,588 MHz compared to 2,572 MHz. In practice, these clock differences are negligible — the 5070 Ti's higher texture rate of 724.6 GTexels/s versus 493.8 GTexels/s and pixel rate of 248.4 GPixel/s versus 205.8 GPixel/s are far more impactful, meaning the 5070 Ti can push more geometry and fill more pixels per second regardless of the marginal clock parity. Both cards share identical 1,750 MHz memory speed and double-precision floating-point support, making those points of no differentiation.
The Gigabyte RTX 5070 Ti Gaming OC holds a clear and substantial performance advantage in this group across every compute and throughput metric that matters. The Gainward Phoenix-S is not a slow card, but it represents a different tier of GPU; users prioritizing maximum rendering performance — especially at higher resolutions or with demanding graphical effects — will find the 5070 Ti meaningfully ahead. The Phoenix-S's only nominal wins are its slightly higher base clock and lower chip complexity, which may contribute to efficiency in lightly-threaded scenarios, but those are marginal considerations against a near-50% gap in raw compute.