Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phoenix-S VS Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Phoenix-S GS

Both the Phoenix-S and the Phoenix-S GS share an identical architectural foundation: the same 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and a base GPU clock of 2295 MHz. They also match on memory speed at 1750 MHz and both support Double Precision Floating Point, confirming that the underlying silicon and compute structure are the same chip running the same memory subsystem.

The sole but consistent differentiator is the boost clock. The Phoenix-S GS reaches a turbo of 2482 MHz versus 2452 MHz on the standard Phoenix-S — a gap of 30 MHz, or roughly 1.2%. Because pixel rate, texture rate, and floating-point throughput are all directly derived from clock speed, this advantage propagates uniformly: the GS edges ahead with 44.48 TFLOPS versus 43.94, and 695 GTexels/s versus 686.6. In practice, a ~1.2% clock uplift sits well within frame-to-frame variance in games, so users are unlikely to perceive a tangible difference in real-world frame rates or rendering tasks.

On pure performance specs, the Phoenix-S GS holds a narrow edge thanks to its higher factory boost clock, which delivers marginally better theoretical throughput across every compute metric. However, given that the gap is under 1.5% on all figures and the core configuration is otherwise identical, this advantage is minimal. The GS essentially represents a factory-overclocked bin of the same GPU, and the performance delta would realistically be imperceptible without a benchmark tool. If the two products are similarly priced, the GS is the marginally stronger choice on paper; at a meaningful price premium, the standard Phoenix-S offers effectively the same real-world experience.

Memory is one area where no differentiation exists between these two cards whatsoever. Both the Phoenix-S and the Phoenix-S GS are equipped with 16GB of GDDR7 running on a 256-bit bus at an effective speed of 28000 MHz, yielding identical peak bandwidth of 896 GB/s. Every single memory specification is a mirror image.

The numbers themselves are worth contextualizing. GDDR7 is the latest generation of graphics memory, and 896 GB/s of bandwidth is a substantial figure — enough to feed high-resolution textures and large frame buffers without becoming a bottleneck in demanding workloads like 4K gaming, ray tracing, or AI-accelerated tasks. The 16GB capacity is also meaningful: it comfortably accommodates modern game assets and leaves headroom for content creation or machine learning inference workloads that can quickly exhaust smaller frame buffers. ECC memory support on both cards is a bonus for users running compute or professional workloads where data integrity matters.

This group is a complete tie. There is no memory-based reason to choose one variant over the other — the bandwidth, capacity, bus width, and memory generation are identical. Any decision between these two cards must rest entirely on other specification groups.

Feature parity between the Phoenix-S and the Phoenix-S GS is absolute. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate and ray tracing, placing them fully in line with current-generation rendering capabilities — DirectX 12 Ultimate in particular ensures compatibility with the full suite of modern graphics features including variable rate shading and mesh shaders. DLSS support is present on both, which is a meaningful advantage for gamers looking to recover frame rates at higher resolutions through AI-based upscaling.

For multi-monitor users, both cards drive up to 4 displays simultaneously and support Intel Resizable BAR, which allows the CPU to access the full GPU frame buffer at once rather than in smaller chunks — a feature that can yield modest performance gains in compatible systems. Neither card carries a Lite Hash Rate (LHR) limiter, though this is largely a legacy consideration. RGB lighting is present on both, which matters for aesthetics in open-case builds but has no bearing on performance.

Like the memory group, this is a complete tie with no differentiating features between the two variants. Every software capability, API version, and hardware feature flag is identical. Prospective buyers should look to other specification groups — particularly performance clocks or physical design — to find any meaningful distinction.

Connectivity on both the Phoenix-S and the Phoenix-S GS follows the same layout: one HDMI 2.1b port and three DisplayPort outputs, totaling four display connections — matching the maximum supported display count noted in the Features group. HDMI 2.1b is the current standard, capable of handling 4K at high refresh rates and 8K output, making it well-suited for both gaming monitors and modern televisions without any adapters.

The three DisplayPort outputs provide flexibility for multi-monitor workstation setups or high-refresh-rate gaming arrays. Notably, neither card includes a USB-C port, which means users requiring USB-C display output for laptops, portable monitors, or VR headsets with that connector will need an adapter. The absence of legacy DVI outputs is expected at this product tier and poses no practical limitation for contemporary displays.

As with the previous groups, this is a complete tie — the port configuration is identical down to every connector type and count. Neither variant offers any connectivity advantage over the other.

At their core, both cards are built on the same Blackwell architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process with 45.6 billion transistors. These figures reflect current-generation silicon and have direct implications for efficiency and compute density — a smaller process node generally means more performance per watt compared to older generations, and the transistor count underpins the raw computational headroom available to both cards.

A 300W TDP is shared across both variants, which is a practically important figure for system builders: it determines PSU requirements, case airflow needs, and expected heat output under sustained load. Both cards use air cooling exclusively, and their physical dimensions are identical at 331.9 mm × 127.1 mm, meaning case compatibility considerations are exactly the same for either purchase. PCIe 5.0 support on both ensures they are ready for current and near-future motherboard platforms, though PCIe 4.0 backward compatibility means they will function in older systems as well.

Once again, this group yields a complete tie. The two variants share the same architecture, process node, power envelope, cooling solution, and physical footprint without exception. There is no general hardware distinction to factor into a buying decision here.