Galax GeForce RTX 5050 Magic Blade VS MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X

The Galax GeForce RTX 5050 Magic Blade and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X differ significantly in several performance metrics. The GPU clock speed of the Magic Blade is 2317 MHz, while the Shadow 2X operates slightly lower at 2280 MHz. However, the Shadow 2X's turbo boost of 2497 MHz falls short compared to the Magic Blade's 2572 MHz turbo speed. This results in the Magic Blade having a slightly higher peak clock frequency.

In terms of pixel rate, the MSI Shadow 2X outperforms the Magic Blade with a rate of 119.9 GPixel/s, compared to the Magic Blade’s 82.3 GPixel/s. This suggests that the Shadow 2X can handle more pixels per second, which could be beneficial in demanding graphical tasks. The texture rate also sees a similar advantage for the Shadow 2X, with 299.6 GTexels/s, compared to 205.8 GTexels/s for the Magic Blade.

When it comes to raw floating-point performance, the MSI Shadow 2X offers 19.18 TFLOPS, significantly ahead of the Magic Blade’s 13.17 TFLOPS. The Shadow 2X also has more shading units, with 3840 compared to the Magic Blade's 2560, which can enhance its ability to process complex shading. Furthermore, the Shadow 2X has more texture mapping units (TMUs) at 120 versus the Magic Blade’s 80, as well as more render output units (ROPs) at 48 compared to the Magic Blade’s 32. Both products support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), so there is no difference there. Additionally, the Magic Blade has a faster GPU memory speed of 2500 MHz versus the Shadow 2X's 1750 MHz.

The memory specifications for the Galax GeForce RTX 5050 Magic Blade and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X show notable differences. Both cards come with 8GB of VRAM, but the type of memory differs: the Magic Blade uses GDDR6, while the Shadow 2X utilizes the newer GDDR7 memory. The effective memory speed is also significantly higher in the Shadow 2X, which runs at 28000 MHz compared to the Magic Blade's 20000 MHz.

The maximum memory bandwidth further reflects the difference in performance, with the Shadow 2X reaching 448 GB/s, a substantial increase over the Magic Blade's 320 GB/s. Despite these differences in speed and bandwidth, both cards share the same 128-bit memory bus width and support ECC memory, which ensures data integrity during heavy workloads.

In summary, while both the Magic Blade and Shadow 2X offer 8GB of VRAM and ECC support, the Shadow 2X's GDDR7 memory, higher effective memory speed, and greater memory bandwidth set it apart in terms of raw memory performance.

The Galax GeForce RTX 5050 Magic Blade and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X share several common features. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, ensuring they are compatible with modern gaming and graphics applications. Additionally, both cards support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D, and DLSS, making them suitable for high-end gaming and content creation tasks. They also both support Intel Resizable BAR, offering potential performance improvements on compatible systems.

One key difference between the two is RGB lighting. The Magic Blade includes RGB lighting, while the Shadow 2X does not have this feature. In terms of display support, both cards are capable of driving up to four displays, which makes them well-suited for multi-monitor setups.

Other than the RGB lighting, the two cards are quite similar in terms of features. Neither has XeSS (XMX), and neither card has a limiter hash rate (LHR), making them both fully capable of handling cryptocurrency mining without restrictions.

The port configurations of the Galax GeForce RTX 5050 Magic Blade and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X are identical. Both graphics cards feature one HDMI output with HDMI 2.1b support, which allows for high-quality video and audio output. They also both include three DisplayPort outputs for connecting additional monitors. Neither card has USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs, so the port offerings are the same in this regard.

In summary, the Magic Blade and Shadow 2X have an almost identical set of ports, supporting HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort, with no additional or unique connections between the two products.

The Galax GeForce RTX 5050 Magic Blade and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X share the same GPU architecture, using the Blackwell architecture and built with a 5 nm semiconductor process. However, they differ in several key aspects. The Magic Blade has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 130W, while the Shadow 2X has a slightly higher TDP of 145W, indicating it may require a bit more power for operation.

Both cards support PCIe version 5, ensuring high bandwidth for data transfer. The Magic Blade features 16.9 billion transistors, whereas the Shadow 2X has 21.9 billion transistors, which suggests it might handle more complex computations. In terms of physical dimensions, the Magic Blade is larger at 316.5 mm in width and 140 mm in height, compared to the Shadow 2X, which is 197 mm wide and 120 mm tall. Despite these size differences, neither card includes air-water cooling systems.

In summary, while both cards have the same GPU architecture and similar foundational specs, the Shadow 2X has a higher TDP, more transistors, and a smaller form factor compared to the Magic Blade.