Galax GeForce RTX 5060 1-Click OC VS Galax GeForce RTX 5060 EX

The GPU clock speeds for both the Galax GeForce RTX 5060 1-Click OC and the Galax GeForce RTX 5060 EX are the same at 2280 MHz, with both cards featuring a boost or turbo clock speed that differs slightly. The 1-Click OC reaches a turbo speed of 2512 MHz, while the EX version achieves a slightly higher turbo speed of 2535 MHz.

When it comes to pixel rate, the EX version has a slight edge with 121.7 GPixel/s compared to the 1-Click OC's 120.6 GPixel/s. The floating-point performance is also slightly higher in the EX, offering 19.47 TFLOPS, while the 1-Click OC delivers 19.29 TFLOPS. Both cards have identical texture rates of 301.4 GTexels/s for the 1-Click OC and 304.2 GTexels/s for the EX.

In terms of GPU memory speed, both cards operate at 1750 MHz. Both the 1-Click OC and EX have the same number of shading units at 3840, texture mapping units (TMUs) at 120, and render output units (ROPs) at 48. Both models also support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), ensuring similar capabilities in that area.

The memory specifications for the Galax GeForce RTX 5060 1-Click OC and the Galax GeForce RTX 5060 EX are identical. Both models feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, offering a high-speed memory interface for efficient data processing.

Each card also has the same maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s, which ensures high-speed access to data, and both come with 8GB of VRAM. The GDDR7 memory version is used in both models, providing the latest in memory technology.

Additionally, both the 1-Click OC and EX support ECC memory, which helps with error correction and maintaining stability during high-load operations. The memory bus width is the same for both cards at 128-bit, ensuring consistency in data transfer rates between the two products.

The features of the Galax GeForce RTX 5060 1-Click OC and Galax GeForce RTX 5060 EX are nearly identical. Both models support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL version 4.6, and OpenCL version 3, ensuring compatibility with the latest APIs and high-performance computing tasks.

Both cards also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, making them suitable for immersive gaming and content creation. Additionally, both support DLSS for enhanced performance in supported games. Neither card has XeSS (XMX) support, as indicated by the absence of this feature in both models.

For system compatibility, both the 1-Click OC and EX feature Intel Resizable BAR (AMD SAM is not supported). Neither model includes LHR (Lite Hash Rate), and both offer RGB lighting. Each card also supports up to four displays, allowing for an expansive multi-monitor setup.

The port configurations for the Galax GeForce RTX 5060 1-Click OC and Galax GeForce RTX 5060 EX are identical. Both models feature one HDMI output with HDMI version 2.1b, allowing for high-bandwidth video and audio transfer.

Each card also includes three DisplayPort outputs, providing support for multiple monitors or high-resolution displays. Neither card offers USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs, meaning the available display connections are limited to HDMI and DisplayPort.

Overall, both the 1-Click OC and EX have the same set of ports and display capabilities, ensuring they can support similar setups and external devices.

The Galax GeForce RTX 5060 1-Click OC and Galax GeForce RTX 5060 EX share identical GPU architecture, both utilizing the Blackwell architecture. Both models also have the same Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 145W, indicating similar power consumption and heat dissipation requirements.

Both cards use the PCI Express (PCIe) version 5 interface and are built on a 5 nm semiconductor process. They also feature the same number of transistors, with 21,900 million transistors, ensuring comparable computational potential.

In terms of physical dimensions, the 1-Click OC is slightly smaller, with a width of 247 mm and a height of 131 mm, while the EX is slightly larger, measuring 264 mm in width and 145 mm in height. Neither model features air-water cooling, and both share the same compact, efficient cooling design for their power requirements.