Galax GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 1-Click OC 16GB VS Galax GeForce RTX 5060 Ti EX 8GB

At their core, these two cards share an identical compute foundation: the same 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and a matching base clock of 2407 MHz. This means workloads that run below the boost threshold will behave identically on both cards, and neither holds an architectural advantage — they are effectively the same silicon.

The meaningful separation appears at peak boost. The EX 8GB reaches a turbo clock of 2617 MHz versus 2587 MHz on the 1-Click OC 16GB — a 30 MHz difference that flows directly into every derived metric. The EX 8GB edges ahead with 24.12 TFLOPS of floating-point throughput versus 23.84 TFLOPS, and a texture rate of 376.8 GTexels/s versus 372.5 GTexels/s. In practice, a ~1.2% compute gap is functionally imperceptible in gaming or creative workloads — no real-world benchmark would reliably distinguish the two.

In terms of raw computational performance, the EX 8GB holds a marginal edge on paper thanks to its higher turbo clock, but the advantage is too slim to be a deciding factor. Both cards support Double Precision Floating Point, which matters in scientific or professional compute scenarios but is rarely relevant in consumer use cases. For most buyers, performance between these two variants is effectively a tie — other factors like VRAM capacity or thermals are far more likely to differentiate the real-world experience.

The memory subsystem is where these two cards diverge most meaningfully. Both run GDDR7 across a 128-bit bus at the same effective speed, delivering identical peak bandwidth of 448 GB/s — so the pipeline feeding the GPU is equally fast on either card. The critical difference is capacity: the 1-Click OC carries 16GB of VRAM, while the EX is equipped with just 8GB.

That doubling of VRAM has real consequences. At 1440p and especially 4K, modern titles with high-resolution texture packs, ray tracing, or complex scenes increasingly push beyond the 8GB threshold. A card that runs out of VRAM doesn't simply slow down gracefully — it can stutter severely or force lower quality settings. The 16GB buffer on the 1-Click OC provides meaningful headroom for current demanding titles and substantially better longevity as games continue to grow their memory footprints over the next hardware cycle.

Both cards support ECC memory, which is a minor bonus for users running compute or professional workloads where data integrity matters. Overall though, the memory group has a clear winner: the 1-Click OC 16GB holds a significant advantage purely on capacity. For a buyer focused on gaming at higher resolutions or future-proofing their setup, the extra VRAM is far more impactful than any of the marginal compute differences seen elsewhere in these two cards' specs.

Across every feature in this group, the two cards are in complete lockstep. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate — the current gold standard for gaming APIs, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, mesh shaders, and variable-rate shading in supported titles. Paired with DLSS support, users on either card can leverage AI-driven upscaling to recover performance headroom, which is particularly relevant given the modest 128-bit memory bus both share.

Ray tracing support is present on both, and neither card is encumbered by LHR (Lite Hash Rate) restrictions, meaning full compute throughput is available for any workload. Multi-display capability tops out at 4 supported displays on each, which is more than sufficient for the vast majority of gaming and productivity setups. Intel Resizable BAR support is also shared, allowing the CPU to access the full VRAM pool at once — a feature that can yield modest but real performance gains in compatible systems.

There is simply no differentiator to call out here. Every software feature, API version, and capability flag is identical between the 1-Click OC 16GB and the EX 8GB. This group is a complete tie, and buyers should look entirely to other specification groups — particularly memory capacity and price — to make their decision.

Port configuration is identical on both cards: one HDMI 2.1b output and three DisplayPort outputs, totaling four display connections — which aligns with the four supported displays noted in the features group. The absence of USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs is consistent across both, reflecting a modern, streamlined I/O layout that drops legacy connectors entirely.

HDMI 2.1b is worth highlighting as a meaningful capability shared by both cards. It supports up to 4K at high refresh rates and 8K output, and is fully compatible with the latest generation of TVs and monitors. The three DisplayPort outputs alongside it give users solid flexibility for multi-monitor desktop setups without the need for adapters.

Much like the features group, there is no differentiator here whatsoever — the 1-Click OC 16GB and the EX 8GB are a complete tie on ports. This is another category that should play no role in the buying decision between these two cards.

Fundamentally, these two cards are built on the same silicon. Both use the Blackwell architecture on a 5nm process with an identical 21,900 million transistors and a 180W TDP. That shared power envelope means neither card will demand more from a PSU or produce meaningfully more heat than the other — system builders can treat them as equivalent in terms of power delivery and thermal planning.

The one concrete difference in this group is physical size. The 1-Click OC measures 247 × 131 mm, while the EX comes in at 267 × 142.5 mm — roughly 20mm longer and 11.5mm taller. For users with compact or mid-tower cases, that distinction can matter. The smaller footprint of the 1-Click OC gives it a practical edge in tight builds, while the larger EX may require checking clearance against radiators, drive cages, or front-panel fans before purchasing.

Both cards use PCIe 5.0, ensuring they are ready for current and near-future motherboard platforms without any bandwidth bottlenecks at the slot level. Overall, this group is largely a tie on the specs that affect performance and system requirements — but the 1-Click OC 16GB has a modest physical advantage for space-constrained cases due to its smaller dimensions.