Garmin Venu 4 VS Garmin Vivoactive 6

The Garmin Venu 4 and Garmin Vivoactive 6 both feature OLED/AMOLED displays, but the Venu 4 has a larger screen size of 1.4″ compared to the Vivoactive 6's 1.2″. The Venu 4 also offers a higher resolution of 454 x 454 px, while the Vivoactive 6 has a resolution of 390 x 390 px. However, the pixel density is slightly higher on the Vivoactive 6 at 459 ppi, compared to the Venu 4's 458 ppi, though the difference is marginal.

Both watches are waterproof with a 5 ATM rating, meaning they are suitable for swimming up to a depth of 50 meters. The Venu 4 is slightly thicker at 12 mm compared to the Vivoactive 6's 10.9 mm, but the Venu 4 is a bit heavier at 38 g compared to the Vivoactive 6's 36 g. In terms of physical dimensions, the Venu 4 is 45 mm x 45 mm, whereas the Vivoactive 6 is 42.2 mm x 42.2 mm. The Venu 4 also has a larger volume of 24.3 cm³ compared to the Vivoactive 6's 19.41 cm³.

Both watches come with replaceable watch bands and have Gorilla Glass 3 for durability. Neither model features sapphire glass for the display. The Venu 4 has a wider band at 22 mm, while the Vivoactive 6's band is 20 mm wide. Both devices are designed for adults, with no specific design for kids. As for temperature tolerance, the Vivoactive 6 can withstand up to 60 °C, while the Venu 4 has a maximum operating temperature of 55 °C. Both watches can operate at temperatures as low as -20 °C.

Both the Garmin Venu 4 and Garmin Vivoactive 6 come equipped with sensors that monitor blood oxygenation levels, have heart rate monitors, GPS, and accelerometers. The Venu 4 additionally features a temperature sensor, compass, barometer, and gyroscope, while the Vivoactive 6 lacks the temperature sensor and barometer. However, the Vivoactive 6 does share the compass and gyroscope with the Venu 4.

Neither device includes a cadence sensor, and neither monitors perspiration, as both products have these functions marked as not present. Both watches offer a comprehensive suite of essential sensors for fitness and navigation, but the Venu 4 offers a slightly more extensive sensor suite overall.

In summary, while both devices are well-equipped for tracking various metrics, the Venu 4 includes more environmental sensors like the temperature sensor and barometer, which the Vivoactive 6 does not have.

Both the Garmin Venu 4 and Garmin Vivoactive 6 track sleep, distance, steps taken, and pace, and both provide sleep reports and detect activities automatically. They also both include exercise tagging and a stroke counter for swimming. However, the Venu 4 offers a few more advanced features in the activity tracking category. It includes a route tracker, tracks elevation, and has a multi-sport mode, which the Vivoactive 6 lacks. Additionally, the Venu 4 is equipped to track elevation, while the Vivoactive 6 does not have this feature.

Both devices also track calorie intake and are designed for golf, but neither model is designed for diving. Overall, while both watches cover the essential activity tracking features, the Venu 4 stands out with its additional route tracking, elevation tracking, and multi-sport mode, which the Vivoactive 6 does not provide.

In summary, the Garmin Venu 4 offers a more comprehensive set of activity tracking tools compared to the Garmin Vivoactive 6, especially for users looking for route tracking, elevation tracking, and multi-sport functionality.

Both the Garmin Venu 4 and Garmin Vivoactive 6 have very similar connectivity features. Neither device includes a cellular module, but both are compatible with iOS and Android devices. Both models also support Wi-Fi, ANT+, NFC, and Galileo, meaning their connectivity options are identical in this case.

Since there is no difference in the connectivity specifications between the two products, users can expect the same level of compatibility and wireless communication capabilities from both the Venu 4 and Vivoactive 6.

In summary, both devices offer the same set of connectivity features, with no differences in compatibility or wireless technologies.

The Garmin Venu 4 and Garmin Vivoactive 6 both feature rechargeable batteries, but their battery lives differ slightly. The Venu 4 offers a battery life of 12 days, while the Vivoactive 6 provides 11 days of usage. When using GPS, the Venu 4 lasts 19 hours, slightly shorter than the Vivoactive 6's 21 hours. Both devices do not have wireless charging capabilities and lack solar power batteries. Neither has a removable battery.

In terms of charge time, the Venu 4 charges in 1 hour, while the Vivoactive 6 takes 1.5 hours for a full charge.

Overall, both devices offer similar battery performance, with the Venu 4 having a slight advantage in overall battery life and charge time, while the Vivoactive 6 lasts a bit longer when using GPS.

Both the Garmin Venu 4 and Garmin Vivoactive 6 offer a range of health and convenience features, but there are some key differences. Both devices include HRV tracking, measure VO2 max and resting heart rate, and provide fast/slow heart rate notifications. However, the Venu 4 offers additional features such as showing readiness level, ECG technology, irregular heart rate warnings, and the ability to answer calls, while the Vivoactive 6 lacks readiness level display, ECG technology, and irregular heart rate warnings. The Vivoactive 6 does include a smart alarm, which the Venu 4 does not have.

Both models have phone locator functionality, call control, notifications, silent alarm, vibrating alerts, fall detection, and a stopwatch. The Venu 4, however, supports voice commands, whereas the Vivoactive 6 does not. Additionally, the Venu 4 acquires GPS faster, while the Vivoactive 6 does not have this faster GPS acquisition feature.

As for storage, both devices have 8GB of internal storage, and neither includes a built-in camera remote control function or a front camera. Both watches come with a 1-year warranty period.

Both the Garmin Venu 4 and Garmin Vivoactive 6 share many features in the App & Software category. Both provide activity reports, inactivity alerts, calorie counting, goal setting, achievements, a free app, exercise diaries, coaching, and period notifications. Additionally, both support routes, sync with existing calendars, have voice feedback, music playback, and display fertile window notifications. They also include maps, predict ovulation, and predict start dates. Both devices also come with video tutorials, support widgets, can be personalized, and track water intake.

However, there are a few differences between the two. The Venu 4 offers temperature tracking, while the Vivoactive 6 does not. The Venu 4 also includes weight tracking, while the Vivoactive 6 lacks this feature. Both models track BMI and have live tracking capabilities. Neither watch includes a barcode scanner on the app.

In summary, both devices offer a comprehensive set of features for fitness tracking and health monitoring, with the Venu 4 having a slight edge due to its temperature tracking and weight tracking capabilities, which are not available on the Vivoactive 6.

Both the Garmin Venu 4 and Garmin Vivoactive 6 have similar features in the Miscellaneous category. Both devices include a battery level indicator, support auto pause, are compatible with smart scales, and can sync with external heart rate monitors. They are also both compatible with Windows and Mac OS X and are available on PC. Additionally, neither model has an external memory slot or a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack.

Both devices also do not support aptX, which is typically used for high-quality wireless audio streaming. As such, there are no differences between the two products in this group, with both offering identical functionality and compatibility.

In summary, the Garmin Venu 4 and Garmin Vivoactive 6 are very similar in the Miscellaneous features, with no significant differences between them in terms of compatibility and available options.