Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Aero OC VS MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Aero OC and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC have identical GPU clock speeds of 2280 MHz, though the MSI model features a slightly lower GPU turbo speed of 2527 MHz compared to the Gigabyte's 2595 MHz. In terms of pixel rate, the Gigabyte card has a higher value at 124.6 GPixel/s, while the MSI model is lower at 121.3 GPixel/s.

Both products offer nearly identical floating-point performance, with the Gigabyte card at 19.93 TFLOPS and the MSI card at 19.41 TFLOPS, showing a small difference. The Gigabyte model also has a higher texture rate, providing 311.4 GTexels/s, while the MSI card offers 303.2 GTexels/s.

Both cards are equipped with 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 48 render output units (ROPs), making their architecture virtually identical in terms of these specifications. Additionally, both cards support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), confirming their ability to handle high-precision calculations.

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Aero OC and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC are identical in terms of memory specifications. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s, ensuring similar data throughput for both models. Each also comes with 8GB of VRAM, providing ample capacity for high-quality gaming and rendering tasks.

Both models use GDDR7 memory, offering high-speed performance, and have a 128-bit memory bus width, providing a balanced path for data to travel. Additionally, both cards support ECC memory, which helps detect and correct errors in the data, enhancing reliability during intensive computing tasks.

Overall, the memory specifications of both products are exactly the same, making their memory performance and capabilities virtually identical.

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Aero OC and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC offer identical support for key features. Both cards are compatible with DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, ensuring broad support for modern applications and games. They also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D rendering, and DLSS, making them suitable for high-end graphical experiences.

Both models support Intel Resizable BAR (AMD SAM is not mentioned), and neither has LHR (Lite Hash Rate), which means both cards are optimized for gaming and high-performance tasks without cryptocurrency mining limitations. In terms of display support, both cards can handle up to four displays.

The main difference between the two models lies in the RGB lighting: the Gigabyte card has RGB lighting, while the MSI model does not.

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Aero OC and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC have identical port configurations. Both cards feature one HDMI output, with an HDMI version of HDMI 2.1b, allowing for high-quality video and audio transmission. Each model also includes three DisplayPort outputs for connecting multiple monitors.

Neither card offers USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs, with both having zero support for these types of connections. As far as HDMI and DisplayPort outputs go, their configurations are the same across both products.

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Aero OC and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC share the same core specifications in terms of architecture and power. Both use the Blackwell GPU architecture, have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 145W, and feature the PCI Express 5.0 interface. Additionally, both cards are built with a 5 nm semiconductor process and contain 21,900 million transistors, ensuring high performance and efficiency.

Neither card includes air-water cooling, meaning both rely on standard cooling methods. The primary difference between the two models lies in their physical dimensions: the Gigabyte card is 281 mm in width and 117 mm in height, while the MSI model is slightly more compact at 197 mm in width and 120 mm in height.

Overall, while both cards share the same underlying technology, the MSI model is notably smaller in width, which may be a consideration for those with space limitations in their PC cases.