Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC 8GB VS Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC Ice 16GB

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC 8GB and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC Ice 16GB share identical specifications in terms of GPU clock speed, GPU turbo, pixel rate, floating-point performance, texture rate, GPU memory speed, shading units, texture mapping units (TMUs), render output units (ROPs), and support for Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP). Both products operate at a GPU clock speed of 2407 MHz, with a turbo boost up to 2617 MHz. They also have a pixel rate of 125.6 GPixel/s, floating-point performance of 24.12 TFLOPS, and a texture rate of 376.8 GTexels/s.

Regarding memory, both models feature a GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz, and they are equipped with the same number of shading units (4608), texture mapping units (144), and render output units (48). Additionally, both cards support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), making them similarly capable in terms of precision computation.

The only difference between these two models is the amount of memory, with the RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC 8GB featuring 8GB of memory and the RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC Ice 16GB offering 16GB. This difference in memory may have implications for memory-intensive tasks, but it does not affect any of the other shared performance specifications.

The memory specifications for the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC 8GB and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC Ice 16GB are very similar, with only one key difference: the amount of VRAM. Both cards have an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s, ensuring high-speed data transfer and processing capabilities. Additionally, both use GDDR7 memory, which provides advanced performance and efficiency, and both feature a 128-bit memory bus width.

Both products also support ECC memory, which helps ensure data integrity by detecting and correcting memory errors, making them reliable choices for error-sensitive workloads.

The primary distinction between these two models lies in their VRAM capacity: the RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC 8GB comes with 8GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC Ice 16GB is equipped with 16GB of VRAM. This difference may affect performance in memory-intensive tasks, with the 16GB model offering more headroom for larger datasets and demanding applications.

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC 8GB and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC Ice 16GB share identical features. Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs for gaming and professional workloads. They also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, making them well-suited for immersive gaming experiences. Both models also support DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) to enhance performance and image quality in supported titles.

Neither card supports XeSS (XMX), but both feature Intel Resizable BAR, allowing for better communication between the CPU and GPU. Additionally, both models are not equipped with LHR (Lite Hash Rate), meaning they can perform at full capacity for cryptocurrency mining tasks.

Both products come with RGB lighting, adding aesthetic appeal, and can support up to 4 displays, giving users plenty of flexibility for multi-monitor setups.

The ports on the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC 8GB and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC Ice 16GB are identical. Both models feature one HDMI output, with an HDMI version of 2.1b, which supports high bandwidth for modern gaming and media applications. They each have three DisplayPort outputs, providing flexibility for multiple displays, but neither card has USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

Overall, the port configurations on both cards are the same, offering the same connectivity options for users who require multi-display setups or HDMI-based connections.

The general specifications for the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC 8GB and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Eagle OC Ice 16GB are identical. Both cards are built on the Blackwell GPU architecture and have a thermal design power (TDP) of 180W, which indicates their power consumption under load. They both use the PCI Express (PCIe) version 5, providing fast data transfer between the GPU and the rest of the system.

Both models are fabricated using a 5 nm semiconductor process, and each has 21,900 million transistors, contributing to their processing power and efficiency. Neither card has air-water cooling, meaning they rely on standard air cooling solutions. In terms of physical size, both products share the same width of 215 mm and height of 122 mm, ensuring similar fitment in most PC cases.

Overall, there is no difference in the general specifications between the two cards, with both offering the same features and dimensions.