Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce VS Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB differ across several performance metrics. For GPU clock speed, the Gigabyte model runs at 2280 MHz, whereas the Inno3D model operates at a higher 2407 MHz. When turbo-boosted, the Gigabyte reaches 2497 MHz, while the Inno3D peaks at 2572 MHz, offering a slight edge in clock speed overall.

In terms of pixel rate, the Inno3D model again takes the lead with 123.5 GPixel/s, compared to 119.9 GPixel/s from the Gigabyte. The difference is also noticeable in the floating-point performance, where the Inno3D achieves 23.7 TFLOPS, surpassing the Gigabyte’s 19.18 TFLOPS. For texture rate, the Inno3D performs significantly better with 370.4 GTexels/s compared to the Gigabyte's 299.6 GTexels/s.

Both products share identical GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz and the same number of render output units (ROPs), which is 48. However, the Inno3D model boasts more shading units at 4608, while the Gigabyte has 3840, and it also has more texture mapping units (TMUs) at 144 versus 120 on the Gigabyte. Both cards support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), ensuring high-precision calculations.

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB have similar memory specs in several areas. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s, meaning they share identical performance in these aspects. Additionally, both use GDDR7 memory and have a 128-bit memory bus width.

However, the two products differ in VRAM. The Gigabyte model is equipped with 8GB of VRAM, while the Inno3D model offers a much larger 16GB of VRAM, which may provide better support for memory-intensive tasks, especially in high-resolution or VR applications.

Both products also support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, ensuring stability and accuracy in calculations, particularly for tasks requiring high precision.

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB are quite similar in terms of features, with both supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3. They also share support for multi-display technology, ray tracing, DLSS, and Intel Resizable BAR, ensuring compatibility with modern gaming and rendering technologies.

However, there are a few differences in their feature sets. The Gigabyte model does not support 3D, while the Inno3D model does, allowing for 3D content playback. Additionally, the Inno3D card has no RGB lighting, unlike the Gigabyte, which comes with RGB lighting. Both products lack support for XeSS (XMX) and have no LHR (Lite Hash Rate) limitations.

Both products support a maximum of 4 displays, making them capable of multi-monitor setups. The primary distinction comes down to the 3D support and RGB lighting, which is available on the Inno3D for the former, and on the Gigabyte for the latter.

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB have identical port configurations. Both products feature 1 HDMI port, which supports HDMI 2.1b, and 3 DisplayPort outputs. Neither of the cards includes USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

There are no differences in terms of port availability between the two models in this group. Both are equipped with the same HDMI and DisplayPort options, ensuring compatibility with modern displays.

Overall, both products offer a similar set of connectivity options, with no major distinctions in their port configurations.

The Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Twin X2 16GB share several key features but differ in some important specifications. Both cards utilize the Blackwell GPU architecture, are built with a 5 nm semiconductor size, and contain 21,900 million transistors. They also both support PCI Express 5.0, ensuring high bandwidth for modern gaming and professional applications.

However, the two models have different Thermal Design Power (TDP) ratings. The Gigabyte model has a TDP of 145W, while the Inno3D card has a higher TDP of 180W, indicating that the Inno3D may require more power and generate more heat during operation. In terms of physical dimensions, the Gigabyte is 199 mm in width, whereas the Inno3D is larger at 250 mm in width, although both cards have the same height of 116 mm.

Neither card features air-water cooling, both relying on standard cooling solutions. The size and power differences between the two cards are the primary distinctions in this group, with the Inno3D being the more power-hungry and larger option.