Gigabyte Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming 8GB VS Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

Both the Gigabyte Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming 8GB and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB feature the same GPU clock speed of 1700 MHz, ensuring similar base performance. However, they differ in their GPU turbo speeds. The Gigabyte model reaches a turbo of 3130 MHz, while the Sapphire model has a higher turbo speed of 3290 MHz, giving it a slight edge in peak performance.

When it comes to pixel rate, the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB outperforms the Gigabyte model with a rate of 210.6 GPixel/s compared to 200.3 GPixel/s. Similarly, the texture rate of the Sapphire card is higher, at 421.1 GTexels/s, while the Gigabyte card achieves 400.6 GTexels/s. These differences suggest that the Sapphire card may handle textured graphics slightly better.

Both cards deliver impressive floating-point performance, with the Gigabyte model reaching 25.64 TFLOPS and the Sapphire model slightly ahead at 26.95 TFLOPS. Both models share identical GPU memory speed at 2518 MHz, shading units at 2048, texture mapping units at 128, and render output units at 64. Additionally, both support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) functionality.

The Gigabyte Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming 8GB and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB share identical specifications in several key memory aspects. Both have an effective memory speed of 20000 MHz, maximum memory bandwidth of 322.3 GB/s, and use GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit memory bus width. Additionally, both models support ECC memory, ensuring data integrity during operation.

The main difference between the two lies in the VRAM capacity. The Gigabyte Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming has 8GB of VRAM, while the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT comes with a larger 16GB of VRAM, offering more memory for handling demanding applications and larger textures.

Despite the difference in VRAM, the rest of the memory specifications remain identical, indicating that both cards should perform similarly in terms of bandwidth and speed, with the Sapphire card having the advantage when it comes to memory capacity.

The Gigabyte Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming 8GB and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB share many key features, including support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 2.2. Both cards support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D rendering, providing a robust set of features for modern gaming and graphical tasks. Neither model supports DLSS, but both support FSR4 for improving image quality.

In terms of display and design, both cards support up to 3 displays. The major difference here is that the Gigabyte model features RGB lighting, while the Sapphire model does not include this feature. Additionally, both cards support AMD SAM (Smart Access Memory) and neither has LHR (Lite Hash Rate) functionality, making them both suitable for cryptocurrency mining.

Both models also lack XeSS (XMX) support, so there are no notable differences in that area. Overall, these two cards are quite similar in features, with the primary distinction being the presence of RGB lighting on the Gigabyte model.

The Gigabyte Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming 8GB and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB share identical port configurations. Both cards feature one HDMI output with HDMI 2.1b support, two DisplayPort outputs, and do not include USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

There are no differences in terms of connectivity options between the two models. Both cards offer the same number and types of outputs, ensuring similar compatibility with modern displays and monitors.

Overall, the port offerings are the same, with both cards supporting HDMI 2.1b and DisplayPort for versatile display setups, without any additional specialized ports like USB-C or mini DisplayPort.

Both the Gigabyte Radeon RX 9060 XT Gaming 8GB and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB are built on the RDNA 4.0 GPU architecture, with a semiconductor size of 4 nm and 29,700 million transistors, offering a similar level of processing power. Both cards also support PCIe 5.0, ensuring high-speed communication with compatible motherboards.

The two models differ in their thermal design power (TDP), with the Gigabyte card having a lower TDP of 150W compared to the Sapphire model's 170W. This suggests that the Sapphire card might generate more heat under load and could require more cooling effort. In terms of physical dimensions, the Gigabyte card is slightly larger, measuring 281 mm in width and 118 mm in height, whereas the Sapphire card is more compact, at 240 mm in width and 124 mm in height.

Neither card features air-water cooling, both relying on traditional air-based cooling solutions. Overall, the key differences between these models are the TDP and physical size, with the Sapphire card being smaller but requiring a bit more power.