GMKtec Evo-X2 VS Minisforum M1 Pro

The GMKtec Evo-X2 and Minisforum M1 Pro both offer a 2000GB NVMe SSD storage capacity, so in terms of storage, they are identical. However, when it comes to physical dimensions, the two products differ significantly. The GMKtec Evo-X2 is much larger, with a thickness of 252 mm, a height of 94 mm, and a width of 384 mm, resulting in a total volume of 9096.192 cm³. In contrast, the Minisforum M1 Pro is considerably more compact, with a thickness of 128 mm, a height of 52.5 mm, and a width of 126 mm, leading to a much smaller volume of 846.72 cm³.

In terms of physical size, the Evo-X2 is significantly bulkier, offering a much larger form factor, whereas the M1 Pro is notably more compact, making it better suited for tight spaces or portability. Both products share the same SSD specifications, ensuring similar storage performance.

While both devices feature NVMe SSD storage with the same capacity, the size difference could be a deciding factor for users who prioritize space-saving or require a more expansive system. The Evo-X2’s larger volume may be suited for users who need additional internal components or a more robust system, while the M1 Pro’s smaller dimensions may be a key advantage for those with limited space or portability needs.

The GMKtec Evo-X2 and Minisforum M1 Pro both feature integrated graphics and support 64-bit processing. However, their CPUs differ in several key specifications. The Evo-X2 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 55W, which is higher than the M1 Pro's TDP of 45W. This suggests that the Evo-X2's CPU may generate more heat and require more power under load. The Evo-X2 also has a CPU speed of 16 x 3 GHz, while the M1 Pro uses a combination of 6 x 2.9 GHz and 8 x 2.7 GHz, resulting in a slightly lower overall clock speed for the M1 Pro.

In terms of turbo clock speed, the Evo-X2's CPU can reach up to 5.1GHz, while the M1 Pro can achieve a slightly higher 5.4GHz. The Evo-X2 offers 32 threads, which is double the M1 Pro's 16 threads, and the Evo-X2 supports multithreading, whereas the M1 Pro does not. Additionally, the Evo-X2 has a significantly larger L3 cache at 64 MB compared to the M1 Pro's 24 MB.

Both products have a clock multiplier of 30 for the Evo-X2 and 29 for the M1 Pro, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The Evo-X2's CPU temperature is reported at 100 °C, while the M1 Pro's CPU temperature is slightly higher at 110 °C. These differences indicate that while the Evo-X2 may provide more processing power with its higher number of threads and larger cache, the M1 Pro’s lower TDP and turbo clock speed offer some advantages in efficiency and potentially higher peak performance under specific conditions.

The GMKtec Evo-X2 and Minisforum M1 Pro both offer strong graphics performance, but with notable differences in their GPU specs. The Evo-X2 has a GPU clock speed of 1295 MHz, which is much higher than the M1 Pro's 300 MHz. The Evo-X2 also boasts a higher GPU turbo speed of 2900 MHz, compared to the M1 Pro's 2350 MHz. Additionally, the Evo-X2 uses PCIe version 4, while the M1 Pro supports the newer PCIe version 5, offering potentially faster data transfer speeds.

In terms of graphical processing power, the Evo-X2 has 160 texture mapping units (TMUs) and 2560 shading units, significantly outmatching the M1 Pro’s 64 TMUs and 1024 shading units. The Evo-X2 also features 64 render output units (ROPs), while the M1 Pro has only 32 ROPs. Both products support 4 displays, and they both use OpenGL version 4.6 and OpenCL version 3. The Evo-X2 supports DirectX 12, while the M1 Pro supports the more advanced DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Finally, the two products differ in semiconductor size: the Evo-X2 uses a 4 nm process, while the M1 Pro uses a slightly smaller 3 nm process. Despite the Evo-X2's superior GPU clock speed and number of units, the M1 Pro's newer PCIe version and smaller semiconductor size might provide efficiency benefits. However, the Evo-X2's higher clock speeds and larger number of graphical units suggest a more powerful graphics setup overall.

The GMKtec Evo-X2 and Minisforum M1 Pro differ in their memory configurations. The Evo-X2 comes with 128GB of RAM, which is double the 64GB of RAM found in the M1 Pro. In terms of RAM speed, the Evo-X2 also has a higher speed of 8000 MHz compared to the M1 Pro's 6400 MHz. Both products use DDR5 memory, so they share the same memory version.

These differences indicate that the Evo-X2 provides significantly more memory and faster RAM speed, which may be beneficial for demanding tasks that require large memory capacities or higher bandwidth, such as heavy multitasking or high-performance computing.

While the M1 Pro offers less RAM and a slower RAM speed, its configuration may still be suitable for less memory-intensive applications. However, for users who require more memory or faster memory speeds, the Evo-X2 would be the better option based on these specs.

The GMKtec Evo-X2 and Minisforum M1 Pro both support the latest Wi-Fi technologies, including Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), ensuring excellent wireless connectivity. Both products also support Bluetooth 5.4, allowing for reliable wireless device connections. However, the Evo-X2 offers more USB and connectivity options. It includes 2 USB 2.0 ports, 3 USB 3.2 Gen 2 USB-A ports, and 2 USB 4 40Gbps ports, in addition to 2 Thunderbolt 4 ports. In comparison, the M1 Pro has 1 USB 2.0 port, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2 USB-A ports, and 2 USB 4 40Gbps ports, with the same 2 Thunderbolt 4 ports.

The Evo-X2 has a greater number of USB 2.0 and USB 3.2 Gen 2 USB-A ports, while the M1 Pro falls short with fewer USB 2.0 ports. Both devices lack USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 and USB 3.2 Gen 1 USB-C ports, but both offer 2 Thunderbolt 4 ports, ensuring high-speed connectivity. The Evo-X2 also includes an HDMI 2.1 port, whereas the M1 Pro has an older HDMI 1.1 port.

Both products feature 1 RJ45 port for wired networking and a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, but neither has a VGA connector or S/PDIF Out port. The Evo-X2 also includes a DisplayPort output, while the M1 Pro has no mention of such a feature. Overall, the Evo-X2 offers a more diverse range of connectivity options, especially with its higher number of USB ports and more advanced HDMI port, but both devices support essential features like Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and high-speed Thunderbolt connectivity.

The GMKtec Evo-X2 and Minisforum M1 Pro differ notably in their benchmark results. The Evo-X2 has a PassMark result of 54021, significantly higher than the M1 Pro's 33969. In terms of single-thread performance, the Evo-X2 scores 4142, while the M1 Pro scores 4472, meaning the M1 Pro has a slight edge in single-thread performance. For multi-thread performance, the Evo-X2 again outperforms the M1 Pro with a score of 17698 compared to 17173.

When overclocked, the Evo-X2's PassMark result increases to 57021, offering a substantial performance boost, while the M1 Pro reaches 34411 under overclocking, showing a more modest increase. Geekbench 6 results show the Evo-X2 with a multi-core score of 17698 and a single-core score of 2774, while the M1 Pro scores 17173 in multi-core and 2897 in single-core, again indicating the Evo-X2 performs better in multi-core tasks but the M1 Pro has a higher single-core score.

In summary, the Evo-X2 offers higher overall benchmark results, particularly in multi-core performance and overclocking, while the M1 Pro has a slight advantage in single-core performance. These differences highlight the Evo-X2's stronger overall performance in multi-threaded workloads, while the M1 Pro's single-core performance might be more favorable for certain applications.

The GMKtec Evo-X2 and Minisforum M1 Pro share the same maximum memory capacity of 128GB, but their other features differ. The Evo-X2 supports 4 memory channels, while the M1 Pro has only 2 memory channels, which may affect their memory bandwidth. Additionally, the Evo-X2 supports ECC memory, while the M1 Pro does not. Both products use flash storage, ensuring faster data access, but the Evo-X2 has a maximum RAM speed of 8000 MHz, whereas the M1 Pro supports a slightly higher RAM speed of 8400 MHz.

In terms of design, the Evo-X2 is categorized as both a laptop and desktop, while the M1 Pro is classified as a laptop only. The Evo-X2 also uses a Radeon 8060S GPU, while the M1 Pro is equipped with an Arc 140T GPU. Both products support a variety of instruction sets such as MMX, AES, AVX, and SSE 4.1/4.2. The Evo-X2 lacks big.LITTLE technology, whereas the M1 Pro utilizes it, which may offer advantages in power efficiency for specific tasks.

Finally, the Evo-X2 comes with a 1-year warranty, while the M1 Pro offers a longer 2-year warranty. Both products feature an NX bit for security, making them similar in that regard. Overall, the Evo-X2 offers a wider range of memory channels and ECC support, while the M1 Pro has slightly faster RAM speed and a longer warranty period.