Google Pixel 10 Pro VS Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Both the Google Pixel 10 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra share the same IP68 waterproof rating, meaning neither has an edge in water and dust resistance — both can handle submersion under typical conditions equally well.

Where they diverge is in physical footprint and feel. The Pixel 10 Pro is notably more compact: at 152.8 × 72 mm and 204 g, it is shorter, narrower, and lighter than the S25 Ultra's 162.8 × 77.6 mm frame and 218 g weight. That 14 g difference and the tighter width translate to a phone that is meaningfully easier to grip one-handed and less fatiguing during extended use. The S25 Ultra, in turn, is marginally thinner at 8.2 mm versus 8.6 mm, but the difference is barely perceptible in-hand.

For users who prioritize pocketability and one-handed comfort, the Pixel 10 Pro has a clear design edge. The S25 Ultra's larger volume — 103.6 cm³ versus 94.6 cm³ — is a trade-off that typically accommodates a larger display and battery, but purely from a design ergonomics standpoint, the Pixel 10 Pro is the more manageable device.

Both phones use OLED/AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates, HDR10+ support, and Always-On Display — so the baseline experience is strong on either device. The meaningful separation comes down to scale and peak visual quality. The S25 Ultra's 6.9″ screen versus the Pixel 10 Pro's 6.3″ is a significant real-world difference: more content fits on screen, media feels more immersive, and productivity tasks like split-screen multitasking are far more comfortable.

On raw display quality, the S25 Ultra also pulls ahead in two measurable ways. Its 2600 nits typical brightness outpaces the Pixel 10 Pro's 2200 nits, which matters most under direct sunlight where legibility can degrade quickly. Its contrast ratio of 3,000,000:1 versus 2,000,000:1 means deeper blacks and more punch in HDR content — a difference that is visible in dark scenes and high-contrast imagery. Pixel density is effectively identical at 498 ppi versus 495 ppi, so sharpness is a non-factor in this comparison.

The Pixel 10 Pro counters with Gorilla Glass Victus 2, a well-established drop-protection standard, while the S25 Ultra uses Gorilla Armor 2, which adds anti-reflective properties on top of impact resistance. Overall, the S25 Ultra holds a clear display advantage — brighter, larger, higher contrast, and with superior glass — making it the stronger choice for anyone who prioritizes screen experience.

The raw benchmark numbers here tell a stark story. The S25 Ultra's Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite chip scores 2,207,809 on AnTuTu versus the Pixel 10 Pro's 961,489 on its Google Tensor G5 — a gap of over 2x. Geekbench 6 results reinforce this: the S25 Ultra leads in both single-core (3057 vs 2267) and multi-core (9846 vs 5712) performance. In practical terms, this translates to faster app launches, smoother handling of computationally intensive tasks, and greater headroom for demanding workloads like video editing, gaming, and AI-driven processing.

The RAM picture adds another dimension. The Pixel 10 Pro ships with 16 GB of RAM at 4200 MHz, while the S25 Ultra carries 12 GB at a faster 5300 MHz with a higher maximum ceiling of 24 GB. In day-to-day multitasking, the Pixel 10 Pro's larger RAM pool means more apps can stay resident in memory simultaneously — a genuine advantage for heavy multitaskers. However, the S25 Ultra's faster memory speed helps offset the capacity deficit by feeding its more powerful CPU cores more efficiently. Both max out at 1024 GB of internal storage, so there is no difference there.

The S25 Ultra also edges ahead with OpenCL 3 support versus the Pixel 10 Pro's OpenCL 2, which is relevant for GPU-accelerated compute tasks. On pure processing power, the S25 Ultra holds a commanding and clear performance advantage. The Pixel 10 Pro's extra RAM keeps it competitive for multitasking, but cannot close the CPU and GPU performance gap demonstrated across multiple benchmarks.

The rear camera systems reveal a fundamental difference in philosophy. The S25 Ultra deploys a four-lens array led by a 200 MP main sensor, adding dedicated coverage and flexibility that the Pixel 10 Pro's three-lens setup cannot match on paper. The Pixel 10 Pro's main sensor tops out at 50 MP, but its trio of lenses — including two 48 MP sensors — keeps resolution competitive across focal lengths. Both phones share the same 5x optical zoom, so telephoto reach is equal, and both offer OIS, phase-detection and laser autofocus, RAW shooting, and the full suite of manual controls — the fundamentals are evenly matched.

Video is where another clear gap emerges. The S25 Ultra is capable of recording at 8K (4320p) at 30 fps, while the Pixel 10 Pro maxes out at 4K (2160p) at 60 fps. For most users, 4K/60fps is more than sufficient and actually more practical for smooth motion capture, but creators who need maximum resolution for cropping or future-proofing will find the S25 Ultra's ceiling meaningfully higher.

The front camera comparison flips the script: the Pixel 10 Pro's 42 MP selfie sensor is a substantial upgrade over the S25 Ultra's 12 MP, which matters for those who shoot a lot of selfies or use the front camera for video calls where detail and crop flexibility are valued. Overall, the S25 Ultra holds an edge in rear camera versatility and peak video resolution, while the Pixel 10 Pro counters with a considerably more capable front camera — making the ″winner″ here dependent on how and what you shoot most.

Running the same Android 15 base, both phones share an extensive and nearly identical feature set — dark mode, dynamic theming, split-screen, widgets, PiP, offline voice recognition, on-device machine learning, and a robust suite of privacy controls are all present on both. The overlap is so significant that for the vast majority of daily use cases, the software experience will feel closely matched.

The differences that do exist are worth noting. The S25 Ultra adds cross-site tracking blocking, Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, and the ability to be used as a PC — a desktop mode feature that lets power users connect to a monitor and work in a more traditional computing environment. These are all meaningful quality-of-life additions that the Pixel 10 Pro lacks according to the provided data. On the other side, the Pixel 10 Pro holds one important structural advantage: it gets direct OS updates, meaning it receives Android updates straight from Google without an intermediary. The S25 Ultra does not have this flag set, indicating updates are mediated through Samsung's own release process, which can introduce delays.

For most users, the S25 Ultra's extra feature set gives it a modest software edge in day-to-day versatility. However, for those who prioritize receiving security patches and OS updates as quickly as possible, the Pixel 10 Pro's direct OS update pipeline is a meaningful advantage — one that compounds in value over the device's lifespan.

The Google Pixel 10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra both offer robust battery features, including wireless charging, fast charging, and reverse wireless charging. The Pixel 10 Pro has a 4870 mAh battery, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra features a slightly larger 5000 mAh battery. Both phones support wireless charging at a speed of 15W and have fast charging capabilities, with the Pixel 10 Pro offering 30W charging speed and the Galaxy S25 Ultra supporting 45W, allowing for faster charging on the latter.

Neither device includes a charger in the box, and both have non-removable rechargeable batteries. Both phones also feature a battery level indicator to track the remaining charge. Additionally, both the Pixel 10 Pro and Galaxy S25 Ultra support reverse wireless charging, allowing them to charge other devices wirelessly.

In summary, while both phones share similar battery features, the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a slightly larger battery capacity and a faster charging speed at 45W compared to the Pixel 10 Pro's 30W.

Both the Google Pixel 10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra lack a 3.5 mm audio jack but are equipped with stereo speakers for an enhanced audio experience. In terms of audio technology, both phones support aptX, LDAC, and aptX HD, ensuring high-quality wireless audio. However, neither device supports aptX Adaptive or aptX Lossless.

Both devices also feature three microphones, which help with capturing clearer audio during calls and recording. Additionally, neither phone includes an FM radio, which may be a drawback for users who enjoy traditional radio listening.

In summary, both the Pixel 10 Pro and Galaxy S25 Ultra offer similar audio capabilities, with support for high-end wireless audio codecs, stereo speakers, and multiple microphones, but they do not support the 3.5 mm audio jack or FM radio.

The Google Pixel 10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra both offer 5G support, ensuring fast network speeds. The Pixel 10 Pro supports Wi-Fi 6E, Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 4, and Wi-Fi 7, while the Galaxy S25 Ultra supports Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 7, and Wi-Fi 6E, with both devices offering a range of connectivity options. In terms of SIM cards, the Pixel 10 Pro supports 1 SIM and 1 eSIM, whereas the S25 Ultra supports 2 SIMs and 2 eSIMs, providing more flexibility for users needing multiple numbers or networks.

Both phones are equipped with USB Type-C, Bluetooth (version 6 on the Pixel 10 Pro and version 5.4 on the Galaxy S25 Ultra), NFC, and have fingerprint scanners for security. However, the Galaxy S25 Ultra supports ANT+, while the Pixel 10 Pro does not. The Pixel 10 Pro has emergency SOS via satellite and crash detection, which the Galaxy S25 Ultra lacks.

Other features like GPS, a compass, accelerometer, barometer, and gyroscope are available on both devices. The Pixel 10 Pro supports Galileo, while the S25 Ultra does as well. The S25 Ultra includes support for motion tracking, but the Pixel 10 Pro does not. Both devices lack a built-in projector, HDMI output, and an infrared sensor, and neither includes 3D facial recognition or an iris scanner. The Galaxy S25 Ultra also comes with a stylus, which the Pixel 10 Pro does not offer.

Both the Google Pixel 10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are equipped with a video light, making them suitable for low-light video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, which means their screens are not designed with these specific materials or display types.

In summary, both phones share similar miscellaneous features, offering a video light for enhanced video functionality, but they lack more specialized screen technologies such as sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.