Google Pixel Buds 2a
JLab Epic Pods

Google Pixel Buds 2a JLab Epic Pods

Common Features

  • Both products are in-ear type earbuds.
  • Both products have no wires or cables.
  • Neither product is a neckband type.
  • Both products have stereo speakers.
  • Neither product has RGB lighting.
  • Neither product has UV light.
  • Neither product has a display.
  • Both products have active noise cancellation (ANC).
  • Both products have passive noise reduction.
  • Both products have a lowest frequency of 20 Hz.
  • Neither product supports Dolby Atmos.
  • Neither product supports Dirac Virtuo.
  • Neither product has a neodymium magnet.
  • Both products have a battery level indicator.
  • Both products have a rechargeable battery.
  • Both products support fast pairing.
  • Both products have USB Type-C connectivity.
  • Both products have a noise-canceling microphone.
  • Both products have a mute function.
  • Both products can be used as a headset.

Main Differences

  • Ingress Protection (IP) rating is IP54, IPX4 on Google Pixel Buds 2a and IP55 on JLab Epic Pods.
  • Water resistance is sweat resistant on Google Pixel Buds 2a and water resistant on JLab Epic Pods.
  • Wingtips are included with Google Pixel Buds 2a but not with JLab Epic Pods.
  • Driver unit size is 11 mm on Google Pixel Buds 2a and 10 mm on JLab Epic Pods.
  • Highest frequency is 20000 Hz on Google Pixel Buds 2a and 40000 Hz on JLab Epic Pods.
  • Spatial audio is not supported on Google Pixel Buds 2a but is supported on JLab Epic Pods.
  • Battery life is 10 hours on Google Pixel Buds 2a and 12 hours on JLab Epic Pods.
  • Battery life of the charging case is 27 hours on Google Pixel Buds 2a and 33 hours on JLab Epic Pods.
  • LDAC support is not available on Google Pixel Buds 2a but is available on JLab Epic Pods.
  • AAC support is not available on Google Pixel Buds 2a but is available on JLab Epic Pods.
  • JLab Epic Pods have 6 microphones while Google Pixel Buds 2a have 4 microphones.
Specs Comparison
Google Pixel Buds 2a

Google Pixel Buds 2a

JLab Epic Pods

JLab Epic Pods

Design:
Fit In-ear In-ear
Ingress Protection (IP) rating IP54, IPX4 IP55
water resistance Sweat resistant Water resistant
has no wires or cables
are neckband earbuds
wingtips included
has RGB lighting
has stereo speakers
has UV light
Has a display

The Google Pixel Buds 2a and JLab Epic Pods both feature an in-ear design, making them similar in fit. The Pixel Buds 2a are sweat-resistant with an IP54 rating, while the JLab Epic Pods offer water resistance with a slightly higher IP55 rating. Both are wireless, but the Pixel Buds 2a come with wingtips, while the Epic Pods do not.

Neither product includes RGB lighting, UV light, or a display, which keeps the design simple and focused on audio quality. Both sets feature stereo speakers, ensuring good sound output for each.

When it comes to durability, the Pixel Buds 2a’s IP54 rating offers protection against dust and water splashes, while the JLab Epic Pods, with an IP55 rating, offer similar protection but with a slightly higher resistance to water. Overall, both are designed to be sturdy and comfortable for active users, though the Pixel Buds 2a have the added benefit of wingtips for a more secure fit.

Sound quality:
has active noise cancellation (ANC)
has passive noise reduction
driver unit size 11 mm 10 mm
lowest frequency 20 Hz 20 Hz
highest frequency 20000 Hz 40000 Hz
supports spatial audio
has Dolby Atmos
has Dirac Virtuo
has a neodymium magnet

Both the Google Pixel Buds 2a and JLab Epic Pods offer active noise cancellation (ANC) and passive noise reduction, ensuring a good level of sound isolation. The Pixel Buds 2a feature an 11 mm driver unit, while the JLab Epic Pods have a slightly smaller 10 mm driver unit. The lowest frequency both can handle is 20 Hz, but the Epic Pods have a wider frequency range, reaching up to 40,000 Hz, compared to the Pixel Buds 2a's 20,000 Hz.

When it comes to advanced audio features, the Pixel Buds 2a do not support spatial audio, while the JLab Epic Pods do. However, neither product offers Dolby Atmos or Dirac Virtuo, which means both lack some of the higher-end audio technologies available in other premium earbuds.

Both models do not have a neodymium magnet, which is often used in high-end audio drivers, but this does not necessarily indicate a problem with sound quality. Overall, the two earbuds offer very similar noise cancellation and audio performance, with the Epic Pods having a slight edge in frequency range and spatial audio support.

Power:
Battery life 10 hours 12 hours
Battery life of charging case 27 hours 33 hours
has wireless charging
Has a solar power battery
has a battery level indicator
has a rechargeable battery

The Google Pixel Buds 2a and JLab Epic Pods both feature solid battery performance. The Pixel Buds 2a offer 10 hours of battery life on a single charge, with a total of 27 hours provided by the charging case. The JLab Epic Pods provide slightly more battery life, offering 12 hours of use per charge and 33 hours with the charging case.

Both models have a rechargeable battery and include a battery level indicator, allowing users to track remaining power. However, neither product supports wireless charging, and neither features a solar power battery, meaning charging must be done through conventional methods.

Overall, the JLab Epic Pods offer a bit more battery life both in-ear and from the charging case, while both products share similar features when it comes to battery functionality and charging capabilities.

Connectivity:
has fast pairing
Has USB Type-C
has LDAC
has LDHC
has Bluetooth LE Audio
has aptX Adaptive
has aptX Low Latency
has aptX HD
has aptX
has aptX Lossless
has aptX Voice
has Auracast
maximum Bluetooth range 10 m 10 m
supports Bluetooth pairing using NFC
Can be used wirelessly
has AAC

The Google Pixel Buds 2a and JLab Epic Pods both support fast pairing and feature USB Type-C for charging. Both can be used wirelessly, ensuring flexibility in use. The Pixel Buds 2a, however, do not support AAC, while the JLab Epic Pods do, offering a potential improvement in audio quality for compatible devices.

When it comes to Bluetooth connectivity, both models offer a maximum Bluetooth range of 10 meters, which is typical for most wireless earbuds. Neither product supports Bluetooth pairing using NFC, so pairing will need to be done manually.

The key difference in connectivity is that the JLab Epic Pods support LDAC, a high-resolution audio codec, while the Pixel Buds 2a do not. This may be of interest to users who are looking for higher-quality wireless audio streaming, but both earbuds are fairly similar in most other connectivity aspects.

Features:
release date August 2025 September 2025
has ambient sound mode
has find device feature
Supports fast charging
can read notifications
Has a built-in translator
has a mute function
can be used as a headset
control panel placed on a device
Has voice prompts
travel bag is included
Has a temperature sensor
Has a built-in camera remote control function

The Google Pixel Buds 2a and JLab Epic Pods share a range of useful features, all of which are identical between the two models. Both products include ambient sound mode, a find device feature, support for fast charging, and the ability to mute. They can be used as a headset and come with a control panel placed on the device. Additionally, both have voice prompts and include a travel bag for convenience.

Neither product has the ability to read notifications, a built-in translator, a temperature sensor, or a built-in camera remote control function, so these features are absent from both models.

Overall, the two earbuds offer the same set of features, providing an equally rich experience with no notable differences in functionality.

Microphone:
number of microphones 4 6
has a noise-canceling microphone

The Google Pixel Buds 2a and JLab Epic Pods both come with noise-canceling microphones, helping to improve voice clarity during calls or while using voice commands. However, the number of microphones differs between the two models. The Pixel Buds 2a are equipped with 4 microphones, while the JLab Epic Pods feature 6 microphones.

Both sets of earbuds aim to enhance microphone performance, particularly in noisy environments, by using noise-canceling technology. While the number of microphones may suggest slightly more advanced mic capabilities in the Epic Pods, both models include the essential features needed for clear communication.

Ultimately, both products are designed to provide effective microphone functionality, with the JLab Epic Pods offering an additional pair of microphones for potentially better sound capture.

Comparison Summary

This is a specification comparison between Google Pixel Buds 2a and JLab Epic Pods. Both products are in-ear, have no wires or cables, and feature stereo speakers. They also include a rechargeable battery and support fast pairing. However, there are notable differences: the Ingress Protection (IP) rating is IP54, IPX4 on Google Pixel Buds 2a and IP55 on JLab Epic Pods; the water resistance differs, with Google Pixel Buds 2a being sweat resistant and JLab Epic Pods being water resistant. The driver unit size is 11 mm on Google Pixel Buds 2a and 10 mm on JLab Epic Pods, while the battery life is 10 hours on Google Pixel Buds 2a and 12 hours on JLab Epic Pods. Finally, JLab Epic Pods have 6 microphones, compared to 4 on Google Pixel Buds 2a.