Google Pixel Buds 2a VS Sony WF-C710N

Both the Google Pixel Buds 2a and Sony WF-C710N are in-ear models, offering a similar fit for comfortable wear. In terms of weight, the Pixel Buds 2a are lighter at 9.4 g compared to the Sony WF-C710N, which weighs 10.4 g.

For ingress protection, the Pixel Buds 2a come with an IP54 rating, meaning they have both dust and water resistance, while the Sony WF-C710N has a slightly lower IPX4 rating, providing water resistance but no dust protection. Both models are sweat resistant, making them suitable for workouts or outdoor use.

When it comes to additional features, the Pixel Buds 2a include wingtips for added stability, while the Sony WF-C710N does not. Neither product includes RGB lighting, UV light, or a display, and both have stereo speakers for an immersive audio experience. Both models are cable-free and not designed with a neckband.

Both the Google Pixel Buds 2a and Sony WF-C710N offer active noise cancellation (ANC) and passive noise reduction for a more immersive listening experience. They also both feature the same frequency range, from 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, ensuring wide sound coverage for various audio types.

In terms of driver size, the Pixel Buds 2a are equipped with an 11 mm driver unit, while the Sony WF-C710N has a smaller 5 mm driver. Neither model supports spatial audio, Dolby Atmos, or Dirac Virtuo, and neither includes a neodymium magnet.

Overall, both models share a lot in terms of sound quality features, with the key difference being the larger driver unit on the Pixel Buds 2a, which could affect sound output compared to the Sony WF-C710N's smaller driver size.

The Google Pixel Buds 2a and Sony WF-C710N both offer good battery life, but with some differences. The Pixel Buds 2a provide up to 10 hours of playback on a single charge, while the Sony WF-C710N offers slightly longer battery life with 12 hours of use. In terms of the charging case, the Pixel Buds 2a case can extend battery life for a total of 27 hours, compared to the Sony's 21.5 hours.

For battery life while using active noise cancellation (ANC), the Pixel Buds 2a last for 7 hours, while the Sony WF-C710N offers 8.5 hours. Both models have rechargeable batteries and a battery level indicator, but neither supports wireless charging or solar power.

Overall, while both earbuds offer solid battery performance, the Sony WF-C710N provides slightly more playback time on both a single charge and with the charging case, as well as a bit more ANC usage time.

Both the Google Pixel Buds 2a and Sony WF-C710N offer fast pairing and support USB Type-C for charging. The Pixel Buds 2a come with Bluetooth version 5.4, while the Sony WF-C710N has Bluetooth version 5.3, showing a minor difference in Bluetooth version.

Both models have a maximum Bluetooth range of 10 m, and neither supports Bluetooth pairing via NFC. They can both be used wirelessly. In terms of audio codec support, the Pixel Buds 2a do not support AAC, while the Sony WF-C710N does.

Overall, the key differences in connectivity are the slightly newer Bluetooth version and the inclusion of AAC support on the Sony WF-C710N, which the Pixel Buds 2a lack.

Both the Google Pixel Buds 2a and Sony WF-C710N come with a solid set of features. They both have ambient sound mode, the find device feature, and support fast charging. Neither model can read notifications, but both have a mute function and can be used as a headset. They also feature a control panel placed on a device and include voice prompts for easier navigation.

Additionally, both models come with a travel bag for storage, and neither includes a temperature sensor or a built-in camera remote control function.

In terms of features, the two models are virtually identical, offering the same functionality in all areas listed.

Both the Google Pixel Buds 2a and Sony WF-C710N are equipped with noise-canceling microphones. This feature ensures clearer communication by reducing background noise during calls or when using voice commands on both models.

There is no difference between the two products in terms of microphone capabilities, as both include the noise-canceling microphone functionality.

Overall, the microphone performance is identical between the two, with both offering noise cancellation for enhanced audio clarity during use.