Hisense 65E7Q Pro 65" VS LG 65QNED85AUA 65"

At the foundational level, both TVs are evenly matched: same 4K (3840 x 2160) resolution, 68 ppi pixel density, 10-bit color depth rendering 1.07 billion colors, a 144Hz refresh rate, and identical 178° horizontal and vertical viewing angles. Both also include anti-reflection coating and an ambient light sensor, meaning neither has a structural advantage in sharpness, smoothness, or everyday usability.

The most significant split between these two panels is HDR ecosystem support. The Hisense 65E7Q Pro covers the full spectrum — HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, and HLG — ensuring compatibility with virtually every HDR-mastered title across streaming platforms, Blu-ray, and broadcast content. The LG 65QNED85AUA, by contrast, supports only HDR10 and HLG, omitting both HDR10+ and Dolby Vision. In practice, this means LG viewers will miss out on dynamic, scene-by-scene tone mapping that HDR10+ and Dolby Vision provide, which is a tangible quality gap when watching content mastered in those formats. This is a clear and meaningful disadvantage for the LG.

For gaming, the Hisense again pulls ahead: it supports AMD FreeSync Premium Pro in addition to the base FreeSync tiers, while the LG tops out at FreeSync Premium. FreeSync Premium Pro adds Low Framerate Compensation and HDR support within the variable refresh rate pipeline — a real benefit for gamers running demanding titles at variable frame rates. Overall, the Hisense 65E7Q Pro holds a clear display advantage, particularly in HDR versatility and gaming-grade adaptive sync, despite the two panels being otherwise spec-for-spec identical.

The wired connectivity backbone is identical across both TVs: 4x HDMI 2.1 ports, 2x USB, a single RJ45 Ethernet port, and Miracast support — a solid and modern foundation for either set. Neither offers an external memory slot, VGA, or DVI, so there are no surprises on the legacy front.

Where the two diverge meaningfully is wireless. The Hisense 65E7Q Pro tops out at Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), which is capable but increasingly dated in busy home networks. The LG 65QNED85AUA steps up to Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), the most current standard in the provided data, which delivers lower latency, better performance in congested multi-device environments, and access to the less crowded 6GHz band. For households with many connected devices or those placing the TV far from the router, this is a tangible real-world advantage. Similarly, the LG's Bluetooth 5.3 is a more refined implementation than the Hisense's Bluetooth 5.0, offering improved connection stability and slightly better efficiency — relevant when pairing soundbars, headphones, or game controllers.

The one area where the Hisense counters is the inclusion of a 3.5mm audio jack, which the LG omits entirely. For users wanting a quick headphone or analog audio connection without additional adapters, this is a small but practical convenience the LG cannot match. That said, on balance, the LG 65QNED85AUA holds the connectivity edge, driven primarily by its significantly more future-proof Wi-Fi 6E support and its newer Bluetooth implementation.

The audio feature sets of these two TVs are remarkably similar at their core — both carry stereo speakers, full Dolby suite support including Dolby Atmos and Dolby Digital Plus, and both offer HDMI ARC and eARC, the latter being essential for passing high-bandwidth audio formats losslessly to an external soundbar or receiver. For users planning to rely on external audio hardware, this parity means neither TV offers a meaningful advantage in audio passthrough capability.

The two notable points of divergence cut in opposite directions. The Hisense 65E7Q Pro includes DTS:X support, which the LG lacks entirely. DTS:X is an object-based surround format widely used on Blu-ray discs and some streaming content, so its absence on the LG could be a genuine limitation for home theater purists with physical media libraries. On the other hand, the LG 65QNED85AUA is equipped with a built-in subwoofer, which the Hisense does not have. A dedicated subwoofer adds low-frequency reinforcement directly from the TV chassis, producing fuller, more impactful bass from the built-in speakers without any additional hardware.

Which advantage matters more depends on the user's setup. For those relying solely on the TV's internal speakers, the LG's subwoofer delivers a richer out-of-the-box listening experience. For those with external audio systems who value format compatibility, the Hisense's DTS:X support is the more relevant differentiator. On balance, these trade-offs are complementary rather than decisive, making this group effectively a tie with preference depending on use case.

Footprint-wise, these two 65-inch TVs are nearly identical in width and height — within about 9mm of each other in both dimensions — so either will fit comfortably in the same cabinet or wall space. Both also support VESA mounting, making installation flexibility a non-issue for either choice.

Where the design story diverges sharply is in thickness and weight. The LG 65QNED85AUA is dramatically slimmer at just 30.5mm deep, compared to the Hisense 65E7Q Pro's considerably bulkier 76mm profile. That is more than twice the depth, which translates directly into how flush the TV sits against a wall when mounted — the LG will appear far more streamlined in a wall-mount installation. The volume difference reinforces this: the LG occupies roughly 37,318 cm³ versus the Hisense's 91,873 cm³, meaning the Hisense is nearly 2.5 times the physical bulk.

Weight tells a similar story in reverse, though here the gap is less extreme. The Hisense comes in at 19,200g while the LG is noticeably heavier at 22,906g — a difference of roughly 3.7kg. This likely reflects the LG's denser internal components, possibly related to its Mini-LED backlighting structure. For wall mounting, the extra weight may require verifying bracket load ratings, but it is unlikely to be prohibitive. On overall design, the LG holds a clear aesthetic edge thanks to its dramatically thinner profile, making it the stronger choice for wall-mount-focused installations where a slim, low-profile look is a priority.

Smart platform parity between these two TVs is essentially total: both offer AirPlay, Google Assistant, Alexa, smartphone remote support, USB recording, voice commands, and a full suite of convenience features like sleep timer and child lock. Neither supports Apple HomeKit, and neither ships with a rechargeable remote. For day-to-day smart TV use, buyers will find no meaningful functional difference between them.

Two specifications, however, create a notable gap in long-term value. Power consumption is the first: the Hisense 65E7Q Pro draws 84W during operation versus the LG 65QNED85AUA's 113W — a difference of nearly 35%. Over hours of daily use across months and years, that gap compounds into a tangible electricity cost advantage for the Hisense. Standby consumption is identical at 0.5W for both, so the savings are purely in active use.

The second differentiator is warranty coverage. The Hisense backs its TV with a 3-year warranty, while the LG offers just 1 year — a threefold difference that significantly reduces the financial risk of ownership over the medium term. Combined with its lower power draw, the Hisense 65E7Q Pro holds a clear edge in this group, offering equivalent smart features while costing less to run and providing substantially more manufacturer-backed protection.