Hisense 85E7Q 85" VS LG 86UA7700AUA 86"

Both the Hisense 85E7Q and the LG 86UA7700AUA share a strong baseline: native 4K (3840 x 2160) resolution, a 10-bit panel capable of rendering over a billion colors, and a 60Hz native refresh rate. Their pixel densities are virtually identical (52 ppi vs. 51 ppi), meaning sharpness will be indistinguishable at normal viewing distances for screens this large. Both also offer 178° viewing angles in both directions, anti-reflection coatings, and ambient light sensors — so neither holds an advantage in panel geometry or ergonomic display features.

The most meaningful split comes at the panel and HDR level. The Hisense uses a QLED (quantum dot) layer on top of its LED-backlit LCD, which typically translates to wider color volume and higher peak brightness compared to a conventional LED-LCD like the LG. More critically, the Hisense supports HDR10+ and Dolby Vision — two dynamic metadata HDR formats — in addition to HDR10 and HLG. Dynamic metadata means the TV can optimize brightness and contrast on a scene-by-scene or even frame-by-frame basis, a tangible improvement in HDR realism. The LG supports only HDR10 and HLG, both static or semi-static formats, which leaves real HDR performance on the table for compatible content.

The Hisense 85E7Q holds a clear display advantage. The QLED panel technology and the addition of both Dolby Vision and HDR10+ give it meaningfully superior HDR versatility — particularly relevant as streaming services like Netflix and Amazon increasingly deliver Dolby Vision and HDR10+ masters. The LG is competitive on the fundamentals, but its conventional LED-LCD panel and limited HDR format support make it the weaker choice for users who prioritize picture quality and future-proof HDR compatibility.

On paper, the connectivity specs of the Hisense 85E7Q and the LG 86UA7700AUA are nearly identical: both offer 3 HDMI 2.1 ports, 2 USB ports, a wired RJ45 ethernet port, Wi-Fi 5, and Miracast screen mirroring. For most users, this shared foundation means both TVs are equally capable of handling a full home theater setup — gaming consoles, streaming sticks, soundbars, and a stable wired network connection all fit comfortably within either TV's port lineup.

The differences, while small, are worth noting. The LG edges ahead with Bluetooth 5.1 versus the Hisense's Bluetooth 5.0 — a minor but real improvement in connection stability and device location accuracy, relevant if you regularly pair Bluetooth headphones or audio accessories. On the flip side, the Hisense includes a 3.5mm audio jack, which the LG omits entirely. For users who want to plug in wired headphones directly to the TV — a common need in shared living spaces or for late-night viewing — this is a practical convenience that the LG simply cannot offer.

Connectivity here is essentially a draw with trade-offs: the LG has a marginally newer Bluetooth version, while the Hisense adds headphone jack flexibility. Neither difference is a dealbreaker, and for the vast majority of use cases — HDMI devices, streaming, and network access — both TVs perform on equal footing. Your preference should hinge on whether wired audio output or Bluetooth refinement matters more in your specific setup.

Audio support is largely aligned between the Hisense 85E7Q and the LG 86UA7700AUA. Both carry the full Dolby suite — Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby Atmos, and Dolby Audio — alongside stereo speakers, Digital Out, and both HDMI ARC and eARC. The presence of eARC in particular is worth highlighting for either TV: it allows a compatible soundbar or AV receiver to receive high-bandwidth, uncompressed audio formats over a single HDMI cable, making it a future-proof choice for anyone planning to invest in external audio hardware.

The one concrete differentiator here is DTS:X support, which the Hisense includes and the LG does not. DTS:X is an object-based surround sound format — a direct competitor to Dolby Atmos — and is commonly found on Blu-ray discs and select streaming content. Without it, the LG would fall back to a downmixed version of DTS:X tracks, potentially delivering a less immersive audio experience for that specific content. For users with a physical media library or who stream from DTS:X-encoded sources, this gap is meaningful.

The Hisense 85E7Q has a modest but clear audio edge in this category. DTS:X support broadens its format compatibility in a way the LG cannot match, making it the more versatile choice for home theater enthusiasts who want full decode capability regardless of whether content is mastered in the Dolby or DTS ecosystem.

At this screen size, physical design trade-offs become genuinely practical concerns. The LG 86UA7700AUA is notably slimmer — 60.9mm deep versus the Hisense 85E7Q's 101mm — a difference of over 40mm that is immediately visible whether the TV sits on a stand or hangs on a wall. That slimmer profile gives the LG a more modern, low-profile aesthetic and reduces how far it protrudes from the wall when mounted.

Weight tells the opposite story. The Hisense comes in at 36 kg, while the LG is significantly heavier at nearly 46 kg — a difference of roughly 10 kg. At this weight class, that gap is relevant during installation: a heavier TV demands more robust wall-mount hardware, more manpower to safely position, and more care if it ever needs to be repositioned. The LG's greater mass also results in a substantially smaller calculated volume despite its larger footprint, which reflects just how much the Hisense's extra depth inflates its overall bulk.

Both support VESA mounting, so neither has an exclusive installation advantage there. Overall, this category presents a genuine trade-off rather than a clear winner: the LG suits users who prioritize a slim, wall-hugging aesthetic, while the Hisense is the easier TV to physically handle and install thanks to its meaningfully lower weight. The right choice depends on whether visual profile or installation convenience matters more in your setup.

Feature parity between these two TVs is striking — smart TV platform, AirPlay, Google Assistant, Alexa, smartphone remote support, USB recording, voice commands, and standard utilities like sleep timer and child lock are all present on both. Neither supports Apple HomeKit, and neither ships with a rechargeable remote. For the overwhelming majority of day-to-day smart TV use cases, the two are functionally interchangeable.

Where the data diverges, it diverges sharply. The Hisense 85E7Q draws just 129W during operation compared to the LG's 195W — a gap of 66W. Running a TV for four to five hours daily, that difference compounds to meaningful electricity cost savings over months and years of ownership. Standby consumption is identical at 0.5W for both, so the savings are purely in active use.

The other major split is the warranty: the Hisense covers 3 years against the LG's 1 year. For a large-screen TV representing a significant investment, three years of manufacturer coverage versus one is a tangible long-term value difference — reducing both financial risk and potential repair costs well into the ownership period. Combined with its lower power draw, the Hisense 85E7Q holds a clear advantage in this category, offering equivalent smart features while costing less to run and backing the purchase with considerably stronger warranty protection.