Honor 400 5G (China) VS Honor 400 Pro 5G (China)

Both the Honor 400 5G (China) and Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) have the same level of water resistance, with both being waterproof and featuring an IP68 Ingress Protection (IP) rating. This means they are protected against dust and can withstand submersion in water up to a certain depth and duration.

When it comes to design dimensions, both phones are identical in width (74.7 mm), height (156.3 mm), and volume (91.069758 cm³), so the overall physical footprint is the same. The thickness of both devices is also equal at 7.8 mm.

In terms of weight, the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) is slightly heavier at 204 g compared to the Honor 400 5G (China) at 196 g. Neither device has a rugged build, nor can they be folded, so the form factor remains standard for both models.

Both the Honor 400 5G (China) and Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) feature identical displays in terms of type, size, resolution, pixel density, and refresh rate. Both devices have a 6.55-inch OLED/AMOLED display with a resolution of 1264 x 2736 pixels and a pixel density of 460 ppi. The refresh rate for both is 120Hz, ensuring smooth scrolling and interaction.

The key difference between these two models lies in the use of branded damage-resistant glass. The Honor 400 5G (China) includes this protection, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) does not. Additionally, both models support Always-On Display, but neither supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision.

Neither of the two devices has a secondary screen, and both have touch screens. In terms of display specifications, the differences are minimal, with the main distinction being the presence of branded damage-resistant glass on the Honor 400 5G (China).

The Honor 400 5G (China) and Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) differ significantly in their performance specifications. The Honor 400 5G (China) is equipped with 512GB of internal storage and 16GB of RAM, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) offers double the storage at 1024GB, with 12GB of RAM. Both phones use Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets, with the 400 5G featuring the Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 and the 400 Pro using the more advanced Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The CPU speeds differ as well, with the 400 5G’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 offering speeds up to 2.8 GHz, while the 400 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 goes higher, reaching up to 3.3 GHz.

Both devices feature integrated LTE and share the same semiconductor size of 4 nm, supporting 64-bit architecture. The GPU clock speed is slightly higher in the 400 5G at 1000 MHz compared to the 400 Pro’s 900 MHz. RAM speed is also faster on the 400 Pro at 4800 MHz, versus 4200 MHz on the 400 5G.

Additional performance-related features, such as DirectX 12 support, integrated graphics, and big.LITTLE technology, are present on both devices. The maximum memory bandwidth differs, with the 400 Pro supporting a significantly higher 76.6 GB/s, compared to the 33.6 GB/s on the 400 5G. The 400 5G’s Thermal Design Power (TDP) is lower at 6W, while the 400 Pro’s TDP is 12.5W, indicating a higher power requirement for the latter. Both phones support multithreading and OpenCL version 2, and both use DDR5 memory, but the 400 Pro has an edge in overall performance capability based on the specs provided.

The camera setups on the Honor 400 5G (China) and Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) share some similarities, but there are key differences in both the main and front cameras. Both phones feature a dual-lens main camera, but the 400 Pro has an additional 50 MP sensor, making it a triple-lens setup with 200 MP, 50 MP, and 12 MP sensors. In comparison, the 400 5G has a dual-lens main camera with 200 MP and 12 MP sensors. Both devices have a wide aperture of f/2.2 & f/1.9 for the main cameras on the 400 5G and f/1.9, f/2.4, and f/2.2 on the 400 Pro.

When it comes to the front camera, both phones are equipped with a 50 MP sensor and have a wide aperture of f/2 for the front camera. The 400 5G lacks a front-facing LED flash, while the 400 Pro also lacks a front-facing LED flash, but it does have the same features as the 400 5G for the front camera in terms of autofocus, HDR, and timelapse functions.

Both devices support features like continuous autofocus when recording movies, phase-detection autofocus for photos, slow-motion video recording, manual exposure, manual ISO, serial shot mode, touch autofocus, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. Neither device has a dual-tone LED flash, laser autofocus, HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording support, or the ability to record 3D photo/video. Additionally, neither device has a front-facing camera under the display.

The Honor 400 5G (China) and Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) run the same version of Android, Android 15, and share many key features in their operating systems. Both devices have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and can block app tracking. They also support features such as theme customization, dynamic theming, notification permissions, media picker, and the ability to play games while they download. Both models also include dark mode, battery health check, an extra dim mode, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split-screen support, PiP (Picture in Picture), and customizable notifications.

Both phones offer on-device machine learning, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and the ability to track the current position of the device. They also support widgets, sharing intents, a child lock, and multi-user functionality. Neither device provides Wi-Fi password sharing, Quick Start, or Mail Privacy Protection. Additionally, neither phone receives direct OS updates, and both can offload apps.

In terms of operating system features, there are no significant differences between the Honor 400 5G (China) and Honor 400 Pro 5G (China). Both devices offer a similar set of privacy features and customization options, making their software experience virtually identical.

Both the Honor 400 5G (China) and Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) are equipped with a large 7200 mAh battery, ensuring extended usage. However, the key differences lie in their charging capabilities. The Honor 400 5G (China) supports fast charging at 80W, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) offers slightly faster charging at 90W.

In terms of wireless charging, the Honor 400 5G (China) does not support this feature, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) does. Both devices feature a rechargeable battery and include a battery level indicator, but neither has a removable battery.

Overall, both phones offer strong battery performance, but the 400 Pro has the edge with faster charging speeds and the added benefit of wireless charging.

Both the Honor 400 5G (China) and Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio solutions. Both models come with stereo speakers for enhanced audio playback. When it comes to audio codec support, both phones feature aptX HD, but the 400 5G supports aptX Adaptive, while the 400 Pro does not. Neither device supports aptX, LDAC, or aptX Lossless, though the 400 5G lacks aptX Lossless support, while the 400 Pro does not support aptX Adaptive but also lacks aptX Lossless support.

Both devices do not include an FM radio, meaning users will need to rely on streaming services or offline music files for audio content.

The Honor 400 5G (China) and Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) share a similar range of connectivity and features, but there are a few differences between them. Both devices support 5G, have dual SIM card slots (2 SIM), and come with NFC, USB Type-C, and Bluetooth 5.4. The Wi-Fi versions supported on both phones include Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), though the 400 Pro adds support for Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), providing more advanced Wi-Fi connectivity options.

Both models are equipped with a range of sensors, including a gyroscope, accelerometer, compass, and infrared sensor. They also feature GPS and support for Galileo. However, the Honor 400 5G (China) supports a wider range of connectivity features such as motion tracking and optical tracking, which the 400 Pro lacks. Additionally, the 400 5G includes a fingerprint scanner, while both models are missing emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, and DLNA certification.

Neither device includes a stylus, barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, or an iris scanner. Both phones also lack a built-in projector. In summary, while the connectivity options between the two phones are largely similar, the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) has the advantage with support for Wi-Fi 7, but the Honor 400 5G (China) includes some extra tracking features not present on the Pro model.

Both the Honor 400 5G (China) and Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) include a video light, making them suitable for low-light video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass display protection, a curved display, or an e-paper display, meaning the display characteristics are similar between the two phones.

In summary, the two devices are quite similar in this category, with no significant differences in terms of display type or additional features like curved or e-paper displays.