Honor 400 5G VS Honor 400 Pro 5G

The Honor 400 5G and the Honor 400 Pro 5G both share the same height of 156.5 mm, but they differ in several key design aspects. The 400 5G is slightly lighter at 184 g, while the 400 Pro 5G weighs 205 g, making it heavier by 21 g. In terms of thickness, the 400 5G is thinner at 7.3 mm compared to the 8.1 mm thickness of the 400 Pro 5G.

Regarding width, the 400 Pro 5G is marginally wider at 76.1 mm, compared to the 400 5G’s 74.6 mm. As a result, the overall volume of the 400 Pro 5G is also larger, measuring 96.468165 cm³ versus the 400 5G's 85.22677 cm³.

When it comes to water resistance, the Honor 400 5G is water resistant with an IP65 rating, while the 400 Pro 5G is rated as waterproof with a higher IP68 rating, providing potentially better protection against water and dust. Neither device has a rugged build, nor can they be folded.

The displays on the Honor 400 5G and the Honor 400 Pro 5G are both OLED/AMOLED types, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The 400 5G has a 6.55″ screen, while the 400 Pro 5G comes with a slightly larger 6.7″ display. Despite this difference in size, both devices share the same pixel density of 460 ppi, ensuring similarly sharp visuals.

When it comes to resolution, the 400 5G offers 1264 x 2736 px, while the 400 Pro 5G provides a slightly higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 px. Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and fluid animations. In terms of brightness, both have a typical brightness of 5000 nits, providing excellent visibility even in bright environments.

Both devices feature an Always-On Display, though neither supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision. Additionally, neither device includes branded damage-resistant glass, nor do they have a secondary screen. Both are equipped with touch screens for intuitive interaction.

The Honor 400 5G and Honor 400 Pro 5G are both equipped with 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM. While their storage capacities match, there are significant differences in their performance specifications. The 400 5G features a Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset, with a CPU that has 1 core at 2.63 GHz, 3 cores at 2.4 GHz, and 4 cores at 1.8 GHz. In contrast, the 400 Pro 5G is powered by the more advanced Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, with a higher CPU speed setup of 3 cores at 3.15 GHz, 2 cores at 2.96 GHz, 2 cores at 2.26 GHz, and 1 core at 3.3 GHz.

When it comes to benchmark scores, the 400 5G achieves an AnTuTu score of 845,000, while the 400 Pro 5G performs much better with a score of 2,010,000. The Geekbench 6 results also reflect this difference, with the 400 5G scoring 3,256 in multi-core and 1,122 in single-core tests, while the 400 Pro 5G achieves 7,325 in multi-core and 2,213 in single-core tests.

The 400 Pro 5G also has a faster RAM speed of 4,800 MHz compared to the 400 5G’s 3,200 MHz. Additionally, the 400 Pro 5G offers a higher memory bandwidth of 76.6 GB/s, significantly outpacing the 400 5G’s 25.6 GB/s. Both devices use a 4 nm semiconductor size, support 64-bit architecture, and have integrated graphics. The 400 Pro 5G also has a higher maximum memory capacity of 24GB, compared to the 400 5G’s 16GB. Other specs, such as GPU names (Adreno 720 for the 400 5G and Adreno 750 for the 400 Pro 5G), GPU clock speed (950 MHz for the 400 5G and 900 MHz for the 400 Pro 5G), DirectX version (DirectX 12), and thermal design power (TDP) (6W for the 400 5G and 12.5W for the 400 Pro 5G) are also noted but show variations between the two products.

The Honor 400 5G and the Honor 400 Pro 5G both feature a dual-lens main camera setup, but they differ in the number of lenses and their specifications. The 400 5G has a 200 MP and a 12 MP lens with wide apertures of f/2.2 and f/1.9, respectively. The 400 Pro 5G, on the other hand, has a more complex setup with a 200 MP, 50 MP, and 12 MP lens configuration, with apertures of f/1.9, f/2.4, and f/2.2. Both devices have optical image stabilization, continuous autofocus for video recording, and phase-detection autofocus for photos, as well as the ability to support slow-motion video recording, HDR mode, and manual exposure.

The front camera also shows some differences. The 400 5G features a single 50 MP front camera, while the 400 Pro 5G offers a dual-lens front camera setup with 50 MP and 2 MP lenses. Both devices include a flash with a single LED, but neither has a dual-tone LED flash or a front-facing LED flash. Additionally, both phones are capable of in-camera panoramas, timelapse functions, and touch autofocus. However, the 400 Pro 5G offers a 3x optical zoom, which is absent on the 400 5G.

Both devices share several other features, including the ability to use manual ISO, manual white balance, serial shot mode, and manual focus. Neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and both lack a BSI sensor, laser autofocus, 360° panorama shooting, or 3D photo/video recording capabilities. The front-facing camera on both models does not have any under-display features.

Both the Honor 400 5G and the Honor 400 Pro 5G run on Android 15, offering a range of similar features aimed at enhancing user experience. Both devices include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and the ability to block app tracking. They also feature theme customization, notification permissions, and media pickers, along with the ability to play games while they download. Furthermore, both phones support dark mode, battery health checks, an extra dim mode, dynamic theming, customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, and split-screen multitasking.

In terms of differences, both devices share most of the same core functionalities, but neither supports Quick Start. Both have PiP (Picture in Picture) mode, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and the ability to track the current position of the device. They also have a multi-user system and share the ability to offload apps. However, while both phones lack Wi-Fi password sharing and focus modes, neither device provides Mail Privacy Protection, and both block cross-site tracking.

Overall, there are no significant functional differences in the operating system specifications between the two devices, as they share nearly identical features. Both are free and open source and offer comprehensive privacy and customization options, along with a variety of multitasking and accessibility tools.

The Honor 400 5G and the Honor 400 Pro 5G differ in several key battery features. The 400 5G has a 5300 mAh battery, while the 400 Pro 5G offers a larger 6000 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, but the 400 Pro 5G has a faster charging speed of 100W, compared to the 66W charging speed of the 400 5G. Additionally, the 400 Pro 5G supports wireless charging, which is not available on the 400 5G.

Both phones come with a charger and have rechargeable batteries, with a battery level indicator. Neither device has a removable battery. Both also feature a non-removable battery and support fast charging. However, the 400 Pro 5G’s larger battery and higher charging speed may provide a more efficient charging experience overall.

Overall, while both devices offer robust battery options, the 400 Pro 5G stands out with its larger battery capacity, wireless charging support, and faster charging speed.

Both the Honor 400 5G and the Honor 400 Pro 5G share similar audio features, with both devices lacking a 3.5 mm audio jack socket. However, both phones are equipped with stereo speakers for enhanced sound quality. They also both support aptX HD for high-quality audio streaming, though neither device supports aptX, LDAC, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. Additionally, neither device includes a radio.

In terms of audio functionality, the specifications are virtually identical between the two devices, with both offering the same audio technologies and limitations. There are no significant differences in their audio capabilities based on the provided specs.

Overall, while the audio features are very similar on both phones, the lack of a 3.5 mm jack and the absence of advanced wireless audio protocols like aptX or LDAC mean that neither device supports the highest-end wireless audio experiences available today.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Honor 400 Pro 5G support 5G connectivity, have dual SIM card slots, and offer NFC capabilities. They both also feature USB Type-C ports, with USB version 2 support. However, the 400 Pro 5G stands out with its support for the latest Wi-Fi technologies, including Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7, while the 400 5G supports Wi-Fi 4, 5, and 6. In terms of download and upload speeds, the 400 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the 400 5G, offering download speeds of 10,000 MBit/s and upload speeds of 3,500 MBit/s, compared to the 400 5G’s 5,000 MBit/s download and 160 MBit/s upload speeds.

Both phones share several key features, such as Bluetooth 5.4, a fingerprint scanner, GPS, a compass, an infrared sensor, an accelerometer, and a cellular module. Neither device supports an external memory slot, has a barometer, HDMI output, or a built-in projector. Both also lack 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, and a stylus. Neither device features motion or optical tracking capabilities. The 400 5G, however, includes a gyroscope, while the 400 Pro 5G does not.

Both phones support Galileo for satellite navigation, but neither supports ANT+, crash detection, or emergency SOS via satellite. Both devices also do not have DLNA certification or support Wi-Fi password sharing. The 400 Pro 5G, with its faster speeds and enhanced Wi-Fi capabilities, offers a slight edge in terms of connectivity, though many features remain consistent between the two devices.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Honor 400 Pro 5G are equipped with a video light, which can be useful for low-light photography. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays. These specifications are identical for both products, so there are no differences in terms of display characteristics between the two models in this group.

Overall, the only shared feature in this category is the presence of a video light, and neither product offers advanced display technologies like sapphire glass or curved/e-paper displays.

In conclusion, both devices are quite similar when it comes to miscellaneous features, with the key difference being that neither offers specialized display technologies.