Honor 400 5G VS Honor 400 Pro 5G

The most consequential design difference between these two phones is their water protection rating. The Honor 400 5G carries an IP65 rating, which means it can withstand low-pressure water jets but is not suited for submersion. The Honor 400 Pro 5G steps up to IP68, meaning it can be fully submerged in water — a meaningful real-world advantage for anyone who might drop their phone in a sink, pool, or puddle. This is not a trivial gap: IP68 offers substantially more peace of mind in everyday accident scenarios.

The trade-off for that extra protection comes in physical size and weight. The Pro is noticeably heavier at 205 g versus 184 g — a 21-gram difference that is perceptible during extended one-handed use. It is also thicker (8.1 mm vs 7.3 mm) and slightly wider (76.1 mm vs 74.6 mm), translating to a significantly larger overall volume of 96.47 cm³ compared to 85.23 cm³. This suggests the Pro accommodates a larger battery or more robust internal components, at the cost of a slimmer, lighter form factor.

Neither device has a rugged build or foldable design, so those are non-factors. Overall, the Honor 400 Pro 5G holds a clear edge in protection, but the Honor 400 5G wins on ergonomics — it is meaningfully lighter and slimmer. Users who prioritize handling comfort or pocketability will prefer the standard model; those who want better durability against water exposure should lean toward the Pro.

Both phones share the same display technology foundation: an OLED/AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, 5000 nits of typical brightness, and a pixel density of 460 ppi. That brightness figure is exceptionally high and translates to excellent outdoor legibility in direct sunlight, while the 460 ppi density ensures sharp, crisp text and imagery on both devices. Always-On Display support is present on both, and neither carries branded damage-resistant glass or HDR certification of any kind.

The only meaningful differentiator here is screen size. The Honor 400 Pro 5G features a larger 6.7″ panel compared to the standard model's 6.55″, which comes with a proportionally higher resolution of 1280 x 2800 px versus 1264 x 2736 px. Because the pixel density lands at exactly the same 460 ppi for both, the resolution difference is simply a consequence of the size difference — not a sharpness advantage for either device. In practice, the larger screen benefits media consumption, multitasking, and reading, while the smaller display on the 400 5G is easier to manage one-handed.

For display quality alone, these two phones are effectively tied — same technology, same sharpness, same brightness, same feature set. The choice comes down entirely to screen real estate preference: users who want a more compact experience will favor the Honor 400 5G, while those who prioritize a larger canvas should lean toward the Pro.

This is where the two phones diverge most dramatically. The Honor 400 5G runs on a Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, a capable mid-range chip, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 — Qualcomm's flagship-tier silicon. The real-world gap is enormous: the Pro scores roughly 2,010,000 on AnTuTu versus the standard model's 845,000, and its Geekbench 6 multi-core result of 7,325 dwarfs the 400 5G's 3,256. This is not a marginal difference — the Pro is more than twice as fast in sustained workloads, which shows up in demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, and running multiple apps simultaneously.

The memory subsystem tells a similar story. Both phones ship with 12GB of RAM and 512GB of storage, but the Pro's RAM operates at 4800 MHz versus 3200 MHz on the standard model, and its maximum memory bandwidth is a staggering 76.6 GB/s compared to just 25.6 GB/s — three times higher. Higher bandwidth directly benefits GPU-intensive tasks and fast data throughput. The Pro also supports up to 24GB of maximum memory versus the 400 5G's 16GB, giving it more headroom for future configurations. One notable trade-off: the Pro's TDP of 12.5W is more than double the standard model's 6W, meaning it generates more heat and will draw more power under load.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G wins this category outright and without contest. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 platform places it firmly in flagship territory, while the 400 5G operates as a competent mid-ranger. For everyday tasks like browsing and streaming the difference may not always be visible, but for gaming, heavy multitasking, or any compute-intensive use case, the Pro has a decisive and substantial advantage.

On the surface, both phones share a strong camera foundation: a 200MP primary sensor with OIS, phase-detection autofocus, slow-motion recording, and a full suite of manual controls. The 50MP front camera is also identical on both. Where the systems split apart is in versatility. The Honor 400 5G pairs its 200MP main sensor with a single 12MP secondary lens and offers no optical zoom, meaning any telephoto-style shots rely entirely on digital cropping. The Honor 400 Pro 5G adds a dedicated 50MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom, turning it into a proper triple-camera system — a meaningful upgrade for anyone who regularly photographs subjects at a distance.

Optical zoom matters because it preserves image quality when reaching beyond the main lens. Digital zoom simply crops and enlarges, losing detail in the process. A 3x optical zoom is enough to comfortably frame portraits, architecture details, or distant subjects without the softness that digital zoom introduces. The addition of a 50MP telephoto — rather than the lower-resolution periscopes found on some competitors — also suggests strong detail retention at that focal length. On the front, the Pro's dual selfie system (50 + 2MP) adds a secondary depth sensor, which can improve portrait mode accuracy compared to the 400 5G's single front lens.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G holds a clear camera advantage, driven entirely by its extra telephoto lens and optical zoom capability. Users who shoot mostly wide or standard shots and rely on the main sensor will find both phones comparable, but anyone who values flexible focal range — portraits, travel, events — will get substantially more from the Pro's triple-camera setup.

When it comes to software, the choice between these two phones is straightforward: there is none. Both the Honor 400 5G and the Honor 400 Pro 5G run Android 15 and share an identical feature set across every single spec in this category. From privacy controls — including camera, microphone, and location permissions — to usability features like split-screen, Picture-in-Picture, dynamic theming, and offline voice recognition, the two devices are completely indistinguishable on paper.

A few shared limitations are worth noting for context. Neither device gets direct OS updates from Google, meaning updates are filtered through Honor's own software layer, which can introduce delays. Neither supports Wi-Fi password sharing, cross-site tracking blocking, or focus modes — features that some competing platforms offer. These absences apply equally to both phones and should factor into a broader platform decision rather than a comparison between the two models.

This category is a complete tie. No differentiator exists — not a single spec differs between the two. Software experience will be functionally identical on both devices, and any purchasing decision should rest entirely on the hardware differences covered in other categories.

Battery is another category where the Honor 400 Pro 5G pulls noticeably ahead. Its 6000 mAh cell is a significant step up from the standard model's 5300 mAh — a 700 mAh difference that, all else being equal, translates to meaningfully longer usage between charges. Given that the Pro also runs a more power-hungry chipset, the larger battery helps offset that increased draw, making the longevity gap between the two phones less predictable than the raw numbers suggest.

Charging tells an equally clear story. The Honor 400 Pro 5G supports 100W wired fast charging, compared to 66W on the 400 5G — a difference that can translate to noticeably shorter time plugged in when topping up from low. More importantly, the Pro adds wireless charging, a feature entirely absent on the standard model. Wireless charging is a daily convenience that many users find difficult to give up once accustomed to it, enabling effortless top-ups on compatible pads without reaching for a cable.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G wins this category on every metric: larger battery, faster wired charging, and exclusive wireless charging support. Both phones include a charger in the box and have non-removable batteries, so those factors are a wash. For users who prioritize all-day stamina and charging flexibility, the Pro makes a compelling case here.

Audio is another category where the two phones are completely identical. Both the Honor 400 5G and the Honor 400 Pro 5G feature stereo speakers and support aptX HD for high-quality Bluetooth audio transmission — while lacking aptX Adaptive, LDAC, and a 3.5mm headphone jack. Neither includes a built-in radio.

The presence of aptX HD is a positive for wireless audio enthusiasts, as it supports higher bitrates than standard aptX, delivering noticeably better sound quality to compatible Bluetooth headphones. However, the absence of LDAC — Sony's higher-bandwidth codec favored by audiophiles — and aptX Adaptive means neither phone sits at the very top of wireless audio capability. The lack of a headphone jack is a shared limitation that pushes all wired listening through an adapter or USB-C headphones.

This category is a complete tie. Every audio specification is identical across both devices, so sound performance — whether through the speakers or Bluetooth — will be indistinguishable between them. Audio preferences should play no role in choosing between these two models.

Connectivity is broadly strong on both devices, with shared support for 5G, Bluetooth 5.4, NFC, dual SIM, USB Type-C, GPS, infrared, and Galileo. The shared baseline is solid for everyday use — but the Wi-Fi story diverges sharply. The Honor 400 5G tops out at Wi-Fi 6, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G extends to Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 7. Wi-Fi 7 in particular delivers substantially lower latency and higher throughput on compatible routers, which matters most in congested environments and for data-intensive tasks like 4K streaming or large file transfers. The Pro's peak download speed of 10,000 Mbits/s versus the standard model's 5,000 Mbits/s, and especially its upload speed of 3,500 Mbits/s compared to just 160 Mbits/s, reflect this advantage concretely — the upload gap in particular is enormous and relevant for anyone who frequently shares large files or video content.

One surprising reversal: the Honor 400 5G includes a gyroscope, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G does not. A gyroscope enables precise rotational tracking, which is used in mobile gaming, augmented reality applications, and some camera stabilization algorithms. Its absence on the Pro is an unexpected omission for a flagship-tier device and a genuine functional disadvantage for users in those scenarios.

On balance, the Honor 400 Pro 5G leads in connectivity thanks to its superior Wi-Fi standard and dramatically faster upload speeds — advantages that will matter in modern networking environments. However, the standard Honor 400 5G holds an unusual edge with its gyroscope, making it the better choice for gamers and AR users. Neither phone wins this category cleanly, but overall connectivity breadth favors the Pro.

The miscellaneous category offers nothing to separate these two devices. Both the Honor 400 5G and the Honor 400 Pro 5G share every attribute here identically: a video light is present on both, and neither features a sapphire glass display, a curved display, or an e-paper display.

This is a complete tie with no differentiators. Any decision between these two phones should be made entirely on the basis of the hardware and feature differences covered in other categories.