Honor 400 5G VS Honor X5c

The Honor 400 5G offers water resistance, while the Honor X5c does not have any water resistance. This makes the 400 5G a better option in environments where water exposure is a concern.

In terms of weight, the Honor 400 5G is slightly lighter at 184 g, compared to the 186 g of the Honor X5c. The 400 5G is also thinner, with a thickness of 7.3 mm, compared to 7.9 mm for the X5c.

Regarding dimensions, the Honor 400 5G measures 74.6 mm in width and 156.5 mm in height, while the X5c is slightly wider at 77 mm and taller at 167 mm. The volume of the 400 5G is 85.23 cm³, which is smaller than the 101.59 cm³ of the X5c, indicating the X5c has a larger overall size.

The Honor 400 5G features an OLED/AMOLED display, while the Honor X5c has an LCD display. This difference means the 400 5G may offer better color contrast and deeper blacks compared to the X5c's more typical LCD display.

In terms of screen size, the Honor 400 5G has a 6.55″ display, which is slightly smaller than the 6.74″ display on the Honor X5c. The pixel density also varies, with the 400 5G offering a much higher 460 ppi compared to the X5c's 260 ppi, indicating that the 400 5G likely provides sharper images.

Both phones have a 90Hz refresh rate, but the Honor 400 5G supports a higher 120Hz refresh rate, providing potentially smoother motion. The 400 5G also includes an Always-On Display, while the X5c does not. Neither device features branded damage-resistant glass, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, or a secondary screen, though both support touch input.

The Honor 400 5G comes with significantly more storage and RAM compared to the Honor X5c. It offers 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, whereas the X5c has only 128GB of storage and 4GB of RAM. This makes the 400 5G a much stronger option for users who need more memory and faster performance.

In terms of processing power, the Honor 400 5G is equipped with a Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset, paired with an Adreno 720 GPU. The X5c, on the other hand, uses the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra chipset and a Mali G52 MP2 GPU. The 400 5G’s CPU also runs at higher speeds with 1 x 2.63 GHz, 3 x 2.4 GHz, and 4 x 1.8 GHz cores, compared to the X5c’s 2 x 2 GHz and 6 x 1.8 GHz cores.

The 400 5G outperforms the X5c in Geekbench 6 scores, achieving a multi-core result of 3256 and a single-core result of 1122, compared to the X5c’s multi-core score of 1391 and single-core score of 420. Other differences include faster RAM speed (3200 MHz vs 1800 MHz), a smaller 4 nm semiconductor size compared to the X5c’s 12 nm, and a higher memory bandwidth (25.6 GB/s vs 13.41 GB/s). The 400 5G also supports up to 16GB of RAM, whereas the X5c supports up to 8GB. Both phones have integrated LTE, support 64-bit processing, and use big.LITTLE technology. Both devices also have integrated graphics, DirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2, and TrustZone, with similar Thermal Design Power (6W for the 400 5G and 5W for the X5c).

The Honor 400 5G has a dual-lens main camera with a combination of 200 MP and 12 MP sensors, while the Honor X5c has a single 13 MP main camera. This gives the 400 5G a more advanced main camera setup compared to the X5c.

For the front cameras, the Honor 400 5G has a 50 MP front camera, whereas the Honor X5c offers a 5 MP front camera. The 400 5G’s front camera is significantly more powerful, making it better for high-quality selfies.

Both phones have similar camera features, such as a CMOS sensor, phase-detection autofocus for photos, continuous autofocus for videos, and the ability to shoot slow-motion and timelapse videos. However, the 400 5G offers additional manual controls (like manual exposure, manual ISO, and manual focus) that the X5c also supports. The 400 5G also includes a wide aperture of f/2 for its front camera, compared to the f/2.2 aperture of the X5c. Neither device has optical image stabilization, laser autofocus, or a dual-tone LED flash. Both phones can create panoramas in-camera, but neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording.

Both the Honor 400 5G and the Honor X5c run Android 15 and share a wide range of features. They both support clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and theme customization. Both phones can block app tracking, include on-device machine learning, and allow users to block notifications for specific apps.

Neither device has Wi-Fi password sharing, Mail Privacy Protection, or focus modes. Both also support dark mode, have battery health checks, extra dim modes, and dynamic theming. They allow app offloading and offer customizable notifications, Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen, and PiP (Picture in Picture). Neither device supports Quick Start or can be used as a PC, and both provide the ability to track the mobile device’s current position, use voice commands, and have offline voice recognition.

The Honor 400 5G and the Honor X5c are also multi-user systems, support widgets, and have a child lock. Both are free and open-source. Some additional similarities include the media picker, game download features, and support for sharing intents. However, there are no major differences in the operating systems of the two devices—they both provide a very similar software experience.

The Honor 400 5G is equipped with a 5300 mAh battery, slightly larger than the 5260 mAh battery in the Honor X5c. Both devices have non-removable, rechargeable batteries and come with a charger. They also both feature battery level indicators.

One key difference between the two phones is the charging speed. The 400 5G supports fast charging at 66W, while the X5c supports only 15W fast charging. Neither device has wireless charging capabilities.

Overall, while the two phones offer similar battery sizes and features, the 400 5G stands out with its significantly faster charging speed.

The Honor 400 5G does not have a 3.5 mm audio jack, while the Honor X5c includes a 3.5 mm audio jack for wired headphones. The 400 5G features stereo speakers, whereas the X5c does not have stereo speakers.

Both phones support aptX HD, but neither device supports aptX, LDAC, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless. Additionally, the Honor X5c has a built-in radio, while the Honor 400 5G does not.

In summary, the 400 5G has stereo speakers, but lacks a 3.5 mm audio jack and radio. The X5c offers the 3.5 mm jack and a radio, but lacks stereo speakers.

The Honor 400 5G supports 5G connectivity, whereas the Honor X5c does not. Both phones are equipped with 2 SIM slots, but the 400 5G offers faster download and upload speeds (5000 MBits/s and 160 MBits/s) compared to the X5c's 300 MBits/s download and 100 MBits/s upload speeds.

In terms of wireless features, the Honor 400 5G supports Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 6, while the X5c supports only Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5. The 400 5G has Bluetooth 5.4, while the X5c uses Bluetooth 5.1. Additionally, the 400 5G has NFC, which the X5c lacks.

Both phones feature USB Type-C and include an accelerometer, GPS, and a cellular module. However, the 400 5G also includes a fingerprint scanner, gyroscope, infrared sensor, and compass, while the X5c lacks the gyroscope, compass, and infrared sensor. Neither phone supports ANT+, a heart rate monitor, or a barometer. Neither phone has a built-in projector, HDMI output, or stylus, and neither supports 3D facial recognition or has an iris scanner. Both phones support Galileo for satellite positioning.

Both the Honor 400 5G and the Honor X5c have a video light, which can be useful for improving lighting during video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.

In summary, the two phones are identical in terms of the miscellaneous features available, with both offering a video light and lacking the more specialized display technologies like sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.