Honor 400 5G VS Huawei Pura 80 Pro Plus

The most consequential design difference between these two phones lies in their protection ratings. The Honor 400 5G carries an IP65 rating, which means it is shielded against dust and low-pressure water jets — adequate for rain or accidental splashes, but not submersion. The Huawei Pura 80 Pro Plus steps up to IP68, meaning it can withstand full immersion in water, typically up to 1.5 meters for 30 minutes. In practical terms, the Pura 80 Pro Plus offers meaningfully stronger protection for users who are near pools, prone to dropping their phone in sinks, or work in wet environments.

Form factor tells a similarly clear story. The Honor 400 5G is notably lighter at 184 g versus the Pura 80 Pro Plus's 219 g — a 35 g difference that is perceptible during extended one-handed use. Its slimmer 7.3 mm thickness (versus 8.3 mm) and more compact footprint (156.5 × 74.6 mm vs. 163 × 76.1 mm) also translate to a phone that is easier to pocket and handle. The volume difference — roughly 85 cm³ versus 103 cm³ — underscores just how much more substantial the Pura 80 Pro Plus physically is.

Neither phone has a rugged build or a foldable form factor, so those distinctions are off the table. Overall, the Honor 400 5G has a clear ergonomic edge for users who prioritize a lighter, more pocketable device, while the Huawei Pura 80 Pro Plus holds a meaningful advantage in water protection with its IP68 rating. Your priority — portability or durability — should drive the decision here.

Both phones share the same OLED/AMOLED panel technology and a 120Hz refresh rate, so scrolling smoothness and color quality are on equal footing. Pixel density is virtually identical — 460 ppi on the Honor 400 5G versus 459 ppi on the Pura 80 Pro Plus — meaning neither has a perceptible sharpness advantage despite the Pura 80 Pro Plus's larger 6.8″ screen (versus 6.55″). The bigger canvas on the Pura 80 Pro Plus simply gives more room for content, which benefits media consumption and multitasking.

Where things diverge sharply is brightness. The Honor 400 5G claims a remarkable 5000 nits of typical brightness — double the Pura 80 Pro Plus's 2500 nits. In real-world terms, this means the Honor 400 5G should remain significantly more legible under direct sunlight, which is one of the most practically relevant display attributes for everyday outdoor use. Conversely, the Pura 80 Pro Plus counters with branded damage-resistant glass, a protection layer the Honor 400 5G lacks entirely — an important consideration for users prone to drops, as unprotected glass is far more vulnerable to scratching and cracking.

Neither display supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision, and both offer Always-On Display functionality, so those factors are a wash. On balance, this category is a genuine trade-off: the Honor 400 5G has a clear edge in outdoor visibility, while the Pura 80 Pro Plus holds the advantage in screen size and glass durability. Users who spend a lot of time outdoors will favor the Honor; those who want a larger, better-protected display will lean toward the Pura 80 Pro Plus.

The silicon gap here is significant. The Honor 400 5G runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, built on a modern 4 nm process, while the Pura 80 Pro Plus relies on the HiSilicon Kirin 9010 at 7 nm. A smaller fabrication node generally means better power efficiency and thermal performance at the same TDP — and both phones share an identical 6W TDP — so the Honor's chip is doing more work with less heat. The Snapdragon also leads in raw CPU clock speed, peaking at 2.63 GHz versus the Kirin's 2.3 GHz, and its RAM runs faster at 3200 MHz versus 2750 MHz.

The Pura 80 Pro Plus punches back in two meaningful areas: 16 GB of RAM (versus 12 GB) and a massive 1 TB of internal storage (versus 512 GB). More RAM benefits heavy multitaskers who keep many apps running simultaneously, reducing the frequency of app reloads. The storage advantage is simply practical — 1 TB is a significant buffer for users who shoot large volumes of photos and video and prefer not to rely on cloud storage. Notably, despite its slower RAM speed, the Kirin achieves a higher memory bandwidth of 44 GB/s versus 25.6 GB/s, which can benefit data-intensive workloads like image processing.

On balance, this is a split verdict. The Honor 400 5G has an architectural efficiency edge thanks to its newer process node and faster CPU and RAM clocks — advantages that matter for sustained performance and day-to-day responsiveness. But the Pura 80 Pro Plus holds a clear practical edge in capacity, offering more RAM for multitasking and double the storage. Users who prioritize raw chip modernity will favor the Honor; those who need headroom for data and concurrent workloads will find the Pura 80 Pro Plus better equipped.

Two very different camera philosophies are on display here. The Honor 400 5G bets big on a 200 MP primary sensor — one of the highest raw resolutions available on any smartphone — paired with a 12 MP secondary lens. High megapixel counts enable aggressive cropping and fine detail retention in ideal conditions, but the trade-off is that the main lens's f/2.2 aperture is relatively narrow, limiting light intake. The Pura 80 Pro Plus takes a more balanced approach with a triple-camera system (50 + 48 + 40 MP), and critically, its primary lens opens to a significantly wider f/1.6 aperture — the widest across either phone's entire camera array — meaning it gathers substantially more light per shot, which directly benefits low-light and indoor photography.

Versatility is where the Pura 80 Pro Plus pulls ahead most decisively. Its 4x optical zoom — compared to the Honor's 0x — is a fundamental capability gap. Optical zoom preserves image quality at distance in a way that digital cropping from a high-resolution sensor cannot fully replicate. The Pura 80 Pro Plus also adds laser autofocus for faster, more reliable locking in challenging conditions, a dual-tone LED flash for more natural artificial lighting, and manual shutter speed control for long-exposure photography — a feature entirely absent on the Honor. These are meaningful tools for enthusiast photographers.

The one area where the Honor 400 5G takes a clear lead is the selfie camera: 50 MP versus just 13 MP on the Pura 80 Pro Plus — a substantial gap for users who prioritize front-facing shots. Overall, though, the Pura 80 Pro Plus holds a broader camera advantage, offering superior low-light aperture, genuine optical zoom, three distinct focal lengths, and more manual controls. The Honor's headline 200 MP sensor and excellent selfie camera make it compelling for specific use cases, but the Pura 80 Pro Plus is the more versatile and well-rounded imaging system.

Across every single operating system feature captured in this data set, the Honor 400 5G and Huawei Pura 80 Pro Plus are in complete lockstep. Both offer the full suite of modern software conveniences: dark mode, split-screen multitasking, customizable notifications, widgets, voice commands, child lock, multi-user support, and camera/microphone privacy controls. There is not a single differentiating data point in this group.

One shared characteristic worth flagging is that neither phone receives direct OS updates — a notable consideration for users who prioritize long-term security patches and feature updates delivered straight from the platform developer. This is a shared limitation rather than a differentiator, but it is the most practically significant piece of information in this group for buyers thinking about device longevity.

This category is an unambiguous tie. Based strictly on the provided specs, no advantage can be awarded to either device. Users should treat OS software features as a neutral factor in their decision between these two phones and weigh the differences identified in other spec groups instead.

The Pura 80 Pro Plus leads on every measurable battery dimension. Its 5700 mAh cell outpaces the Honor 400 5G's 5300 mAh — a 400 mAh difference that, while not dramatic, does translate to a modest but real extension in screen-on time over the course of a heavy day. More impactful is the charging speed gap: the Pura 80 Pro Plus supports 100W fast charging versus the Honor's 66W. At 100W, a depleted battery can realistically reach a full charge in well under an hour, making top-ups during short breaks genuinely practical.

The single most decisive differentiator in this group, however, is wireless charging. The Pura 80 Pro Plus supports it; the Honor 400 5G does not. For users who have invested in wireless charging pads at their desk or bedside, this is a meaningful convenience gap — eliminating the need to plug in a cable every time. Both phones include a charger in the box and have non-removable batteries, so those factors cancel out.

The Pura 80 Pro Plus holds a clear and well-rounded advantage in this category — larger capacity, significantly faster wired charging, and the added flexibility of wireless charging. The Honor 400 5G's battery setup is perfectly adequate, but it cannot match the breadth of the Pura 80 Pro Plus's power features.

The shared audio foundation is identical: both phones drop the 3.5mm headphone jack, offer stereo speakers, and lack a radio. For wired headphone users, both require an adapter or Bluetooth. For everyone else, the stereo speaker setup on each device ensures spatial audio separation when watching video or listening to music — a meaningful step up from mono speaker setups.

Where they diverge is in Bluetooth audio codec support — a detail that matters specifically for wireless headphone users who care about audio fidelity. The Honor 400 5G supports aptX HD, Qualcomm's high-resolution wireless audio codec designed to deliver better-than-CD quality over Bluetooth to compatible headphones. The Pura 80 Pro Plus instead supports LDAC, Sony's high-resolution codec that transmits up to three times more data than standard Bluetooth audio at its highest quality setting. Both are premium codecs aimed at audiophiles, but LDAC is generally regarded as capable of higher peak bitrates, and it is natively supported by a wide range of high-end headphones from multiple manufacturers.

This category is close, but the Pura 80 Pro Plus holds a narrow edge for wireless audio enthusiasts thanks to LDAC's broader headphone ecosystem compatibility and higher potential bitrate ceiling. That said, the advantage only materializes if the user owns LDAC-compatible headphones — for everyone else, this group is effectively a tie.

Shared connectivity foundations are strong on both devices — 5G, dual SIM, NFC, USB-C, Wi-Fi 6, and a solid sensor suite including GPS, gyroscope, compass, and infrared are all present on each. The meaningful divergences, however, are worth unpacking carefully. The Pura 80 Pro Plus supports Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), the latest wireless standard offering significantly higher throughput and lower latency than Wi-Fi 6 — a future-proofing advantage that will matter increasingly as Wi-Fi 7 routers become more common. On the flip side, the Honor 400 5G sports the newer Bluetooth 5.4 versus the Pura's 5.2, which brings incremental improvements in connection reliability and power efficiency for wireless peripherals.

Two exclusive features set the Pura 80 Pro Plus apart in more tangible ways. Its USB 3.1 interface — compared to the Honor's USB 2.0 — enables dramatically faster data transfers when connecting to a computer or external drive, a practical difference anyone who regularly offloads large video files will feel immediately. Additionally, the Pura 80 Pro Plus includes emergency SOS via satellite, enabling distress signals in areas with no cellular coverage — a potentially life-critical capability — and a barometer, useful for weather awareness and altitude tracking during outdoor activities.

Across this group, the Pura 80 Pro Plus holds a clear overall advantage. Its leads in Wi-Fi 7, USB 3.1 transfer speeds, satellite emergency communication, and environmental sensing add up to a meaningfully more feature-complete connectivity package. The Honor 400 5G's newer Bluetooth version is a real but minor counterpoint that does not shift the balance.

The Miscellaneous group offers no differentiating information between these two phones. Both have a video light, and neither features sapphire glass, a curved display, or an e-paper display. Every data point is identical.

This is a complete tie by the provided data. No advantage can be assigned to either device, and buyers should look to the other specification groups — particularly Design, Battery, Cameras, and Connectivity — where the meaningful differences between the Honor 400 5G and the Huawei Pura 80 Pro Plus actually reside.