Honor 400 5G VS Oppo Reno14 F 5G

The Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G differ slightly in their design specifications. The Honor 400 5G weighs 184 g, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is slightly lighter at 180 g. The thickness of the Honor 400 5G is 7.3 mm, making it a bit thinner than the Oppo Reno14 F 5G, which has a thickness of 7.7 mm. In terms of dimensions, the Honor 400 5G is 156.5 mm tall and 74.6 mm wide, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is taller at 158.1 mm and slightly wider at 75 mm.

When it comes to water resistance, the Honor 400 5G is water resistant with an IP65 rating, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is waterproof with a higher IP69 rating, offering better protection against water and dust. The Honor 400 5G has a volume of 85.23 cm³, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is larger with a volume of 91.3 cm³. Neither phone has a rugged build, and neither can be folded.

Both devices are similar in some aspects, such as lacking rugged builds and foldable designs, but the Oppo Reno14 F 5G stands out with its higher IP rating and slightly larger volume. However, the Honor 400 5G has a more compact form factor with a thinner profile and slightly smaller dimensions.

The Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G have OLED/AMOLED displays with some differences in their specifications. The Honor 400 5G has a 6.55″ screen, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is slightly larger with a 6.57″ display. The Honor 400 5G offers a higher pixel density of 460 ppi compared to the Oppo Reno14 F 5G, which has a pixel density of 397 ppi. In terms of resolution, the Honor 400 5G has a higher resolution of 1264 x 2736 px, whereas the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a resolution of 1080 x 2372 px.

Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth scrolling and gaming experiences. The Honor 400 5G has a typical brightness of 500 nits, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a higher typical brightness of 600 nits, making its display potentially brighter in various lighting conditions. The Honor 400 5G does not feature branded damage-resistant glass, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G does offer branded damage-resistant glass for additional durability.

Both devices have an Always-On Display, but neither supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision. They also both lack a secondary screen and have touchscreens. In summary, while both displays are quite similar, the Honor 400 5G offers a higher pixel density and resolution, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G provides a slightly larger screen and brighter display with added durability through branded damage-resistant glass.

The Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G have similar performance specifications but with some notable differences. Both phones offer 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM. However, the Honor 400 5G uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. The Honor 400 5G features a higher CPU speed with 1 x 2.63 GHz, 3 x 2.4 GHz, and 4 x 1.8 GHz, compared to the Oppo Reno14 F 5G's 4 x 2.2 GHz and 4 x 1.8 GHz configuration.

In terms of benchmark performance, the Honor 400 5G achieves a Geekbench 6 multi-core score of 3256 and a single-core score of 1122, which are higher than the Oppo Reno14 F 5G's multi-core score of 2748 and single-core score of 943. The Honor 400 5G also has a higher GPU clock speed of 950 MHz, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G’s GPU clock speed is 800 MHz. Both devices support 64-bit architecture and use big.LITTLE technology, with integrated LTE and integrated graphics.

Additional differences include the RAM speed, where the Honor 400 5G operates at 3200 MHz, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G’s RAM speed is slightly lower at 2750 MHz. The Honor 400 5G also offers a higher maximum memory bandwidth of 25.6 GB/s, compared to 22 GB/s on the Oppo Reno14 F 5G. The Oppo Reno14 F 5G’s thermal design power (TDP) is 7W, higher than the Honor 400 5G's 6W, and the Oppo device supports a maximum memory amount of 12GB, whereas the Honor device can handle up to 16GB of RAM. Both phones use a 4 nm semiconductor size, support DirectX 12, and include TrustZone security technology.

The Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G both feature multi-lens main cameras, but they differ in their configurations. The Honor 400 5G has a dual-lens main camera with 200 MP and 12 MP sensors, with wide apertures of f/2.2 and f/1.9, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G offers a triple-lens main camera with 50 MP, 8 MP, and 2 MP sensors, and wider apertures of f/1.8, f/2.2, and f/2.4. Both phones have optical image stabilization and phase-detection autofocus for photos, as well as continuous autofocus for video recording. They also support slow-motion video recording and have manual controls for exposure, ISO, and focus.

For front cameras, the Honor 400 5G features a 50 MP sensor with a wide aperture of f/2, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a 32 MP front camera, also with an f/2 aperture. Neither device has a front-facing LED flash, dual-lens front camera, or a front camera under the display. Both support time-lapse functions and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. Neither phone supports HDR10 recording, Dolby Vision recording, or 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

Both phones use a CMOS sensor for their cameras, but neither has a BSI sensor or laser autofocus. The Oppo Reno14 F 5G and Honor 400 5G are similar in terms of their camera features, with each offering a solid range of manual controls, panorama creation, and advanced video recording features like slow-motion. The main difference lies in the number of lenses and the megapixel count, with the Honor 400 5G offering higher megapixels on both its main and front cameras.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G run on Android 15, with nearly identical operating system features. Both devices have clipboard warnings, location and camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, the ability to block app tracking, and on-device machine learning. They also support features like notification permissions, media picker, playing games while they download, dark mode, and battery health check. Neither device supports Wi-Fi password sharing, but both have an extra dim mode, dynamic theming, and customizable notifications.

For additional functionality, both phones offer Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen support, Picture-in-Picture (PiP), sharing intents, a child lock, widgets, offline voice recognition, voice commands, and the ability to track the device's current position. Both phones are multi-user systems and are free and open source. Neither device supports Quick Start or can be used as a PC.

The only major similarity in their operating systems is that neither device receives direct OS updates, but both phones offer a rich set of privacy and customization features, making them quite similar in terms of software experience.

The Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G both have rechargeable batteries with no wireless charging support. The Honor 400 5G features a 5300 mAh battery, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a larger 6000 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, but the Honor 400 5G supports faster charging at 66W, compared to the 45W charging speed of the Oppo Reno14 F 5G.

Neither device has a removable battery, but both feature a battery level indicator, allowing users to easily check battery status. Both phones also have rechargeable batteries, ensuring long-term usability.

In summary, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G offers a larger battery capacity, while the Honor 400 5G has a faster charging speed, giving each phone its own advantage in battery-related features.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to use wireless or USB-C headphones. Both devices come with stereo speakers, providing a more immersive audio experience. The Honor 400 5G supports aptX HD, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G supports both aptX and aptX HD. Neither device supports LDAC, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, so users looking for those specific audio technologies will not find them in either phone.

In terms of audio technologies, the main difference is that the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has broader support for aptX with the addition of the regular aptX codec, while the Honor 400 5G is limited to aptX HD.

In summary, both phones offer good audio capabilities with stereo speakers and aptX HD support, but the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a slight advantage with the inclusion of the standard aptX codec.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G support 5G connectivity, offering fast download speeds, but with a significant difference in performance. The Honor 400 5G offers download speeds of up to 5000 MBits/s, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a lower download speed of 2900 MBits/s. However, the Oppo device has a higher upload speed of 900 MBits/s compared to the Honor 400 5G's 160 MBits/s. Both phones have 2 SIM card slots, NFC, GPS, and a compass. They also include Bluetooth, but the Honor 400 5G has the newer Bluetooth 5.4 version, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G features Bluetooth 5.1.

Both phones have USB Type-C ports with USB 2.0 version support, and neither has an external memory slot or emergency SOS via satellite. They both have fingerprint scanners, gyroscopes, accelerometers, and cellular modules. The Honor 400 5G supports Wi-Fi versions up to Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G supports Wi-Fi up to Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). Additionally, the Honor 400 5G has an infrared sensor, which the Oppo Reno14 F 5G lacks.

Neither phone has a barometer, HDMI output, or advanced biometric features like 3D facial recognition or an iris scanner. The Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G both support Galileo for navigation, but neither has motion or optical tracking, nor a built-in projector. Additionally, while the Honor 400 5G offers a higher range of Wi-Fi support and an infrared sensor, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G compensates with a better upload speed.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G are equipped with a video light, making them suitable for low-light video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, so both phones have standard flat glass displays without specialized features in these areas.

In summary, the Honor 400 5G and Oppo Reno14 F 5G are identical in this group, with both offering a video light but lacking advanced display technologies such as sapphire glass, curved displays, or e-paper displays.