Honor 400 5G VS Vivo V60 Lite 5G

The Honor 400 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G both feature water resistance with an IP65 Ingress Protection (IP) rating, ensuring protection against water jets from any direction. While both devices are not rugged and do not have foldable designs, they share this common trait of durability in terms of water resistance.

In terms of physical size, the Honor 400 5G is slightly more compact with a height of 156.5 mm, a width of 74.6 mm, and a thickness of 7.3 mm, resulting in a smaller volume of 85.23 cm³. The Vivo V60 Lite 5G, on the other hand, is slightly taller (163.8 mm), wider (76.3 mm), and thicker (7.6 mm), with a larger volume of 94.98 cm³. This makes the Vivo V60 Lite 5G a bit bulkier compared to the Honor 400 5G.

When it comes to weight, the Honor 400 5G weighs 184 g, which is lighter than the Vivo V60 Lite 5G’s weight of 194 g. This makes the Honor 400 5G marginally lighter and more comfortable for those who prefer a less hefty device.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G feature OLED/AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smooth visuals. However, there are a few key differences in their display specifications. The Honor 400 5G has a slightly smaller 6.55″ screen with a higher pixel density of 460 ppi, compared to the Vivo V60 Lite 5G’s 6.77″ display with a lower pixel density of 388 ppi. This results in the Honor 400 5G offering sharper visuals per inch.

When it comes to resolution, the Honor 400 5G offers a higher resolution of 1264 x 2736 px, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has a resolution of 1080 x 2392 px. This gives the Honor 400 5G a higher pixel count overall, contributing to a more detailed image. The Vivo V60 Lite 5G, however, has a slightly wider screen, making its display more spacious despite the lower resolution.

Additional features include Always-On Display, which is supported by the Honor 400 5G but not by the Vivo V60 Lite 5G. The Vivo V60 Lite 5G, on the other hand, supports both HDR10 and HDR10+, while the Honor 400 5G does not have support for these HDR formats. Neither device includes branded damage-resistant glass, Dolby Vision support, or a secondary screen, and both have touchscreens.

The Honor 400 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G both come equipped with 12GB of RAM, but they differ in internal storage capacity. The Honor 400 5G offers 512GB of internal storage, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has 256GB of storage. This makes the Honor 400 5G a better choice for users who need more space for apps and media.

Regarding the chipset, the Honor 400 5G features a Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7300. The Honor 400 5G’s Snapdragon chip offers a CPU configuration of 1 x 2.63 GHz, 3 x 2.4 GHz, and 4 x 1.8 GHz, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has a CPU with 4 x 2.5 GHz and 4 x 2.0 GHz cores. The Honor 400 5G also has a slightly higher GPU clock speed at 950 MHz compared to the Vivo’s 1047 MHz, though the latter’s GPU is the Mali G615 MC2 versus the Honor’s Adreno 720.

Both devices use a 4 nm semiconductor size, support 64-bit architecture, and are equipped with integrated graphics and DirectX 12 support. The Honor 400 5G has a RAM speed of 3200 MHz, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has a faster RAM speed of 6400 MHz. Despite these differences, both devices support a maximum memory amount of 16GB and use DDR5 memory.

The Honor 400 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G both feature dual-lens main cameras. The Honor 400 5G has a 200 MP & 12 MP configuration with wide apertures of f/2.2 & f/1.9, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has a 50 MP & 8 MP configuration with wide apertures of f/2.2 & f/1.8. Both devices offer phase-detection autofocus for photos and continuous autofocus when recording movies. The Honor 400 5G also supports manual exposure, manual ISO, manual focus, and manual white balance, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has similar manual controls but lacks support for slow-motion video recording, a feature available on the Honor 400 5G.

For front cameras, the Honor 400 5G features a 50 MP front camera with a wide aperture of f/2.0, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has a 32 MP front camera with a slightly narrower aperture of f/2.5. Neither device supports front-facing LED flashes, but both offer touch autofocus. The Honor 400 5G is equipped with a front camera capable of creating panoramas, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G also supports in-camera panorama creation but lacks a timelapse function, which the Honor 400 5G includes.

In terms of other features, both devices include a flash, with a single LED on each, but neither supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. Both phones have a CMOS sensor, though neither has a BSI sensor, laser autofocus, or a dual-lens front camera. Neither phone is capable of 3D photo or video recording.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G run on Android 15 and share a very similar set of features. These include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, the ability to block app tracking, and on-device machine learning. They also both support customizable notifications, media pickers, dark mode, and full-page screenshots. Additionally, both devices can play games while they download, offload apps, and support split screen and PiP (Picture in Picture) mode.

Some features are common to both devices, including notification permissions, Wi-Fi password sharing (which is not supported on either), battery health checks, extra dim modes, Live Text, and widgets. Both phones also support offline voice recognition, voice commands, tracking the current position of a mobile device, and multi-user systems. The child lock is also available on both devices.

However, there are a few key points where the two differ slightly. Neither device gets direct OS updates, and neither has Quick Start functionality. There are no notable differences in the other software features such as dynamic theming, sharing intents, or the ability to use the phone as a PC. Both devices are free and open source, though neither has Mail Privacy Protection or blocks cross-site tracking.

The Honor 400 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G both have non-removable rechargeable batteries, but they differ in battery capacity and charging speeds. The Honor 400 5G features a 5300 mAh battery, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G has a larger 6500 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, but the Vivo V60 Lite 5G supports faster charging at 90W compared to the Honor 400 5G's 66W. Both devices come with a charger included and have a battery level indicator, ensuring users can monitor their charge status easily.

Neither phone offers wireless charging, and both have non-removable batteries. Both devices support fast charging, though the Vivo V60 Lite 5G offers a faster charging speed of 90W, compared to the 66W of the Honor 400 5G. Both phones are equipped with a rechargeable battery, ensuring long-term battery life with regular use.

Overall, the Vivo V60 Lite 5G provides a larger battery capacity and faster charging speed compared to the Honor 400 5G, though both phones share the same basic features like the absence of wireless charging and the inclusion of a charger in the box.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G do not have a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users will need to rely on Bluetooth or USB-C audio solutions. Both devices are equipped with stereo speakers, providing a richer audio experience compared to mono setups. When it comes to wireless audio technologies, the Honor 400 5G supports aptX HD, which is not available on the Vivo V60 Lite 5G. However, neither phone supports aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, or LDAC.

Additionally, neither phone features a built-in radio, a common feature for some devices. In terms of wireless audio options, the Honor 400 5G offers aptX HD, which enhances audio quality for Bluetooth connections, while the Vivo V60 Lite 5G lacks this support, making the Honor model the better option for high-quality Bluetooth audio playback.

In summary, both phones offer similar audio features, such as stereo speakers and the lack of a 3.5 mm audio jack, but the Honor 400 5G stands out with support for aptX HD, which is absent in the Vivo V60 Lite 5G.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G support 5G connectivity and have dual SIM capabilities, but they differ slightly in their connectivity specifications. The Honor 400 5G offers Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), whereas the Vivo V60 Lite 5G only supports Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). In terms of download speed, the Honor 400 5G supports up to 5000 MBits/s, significantly higher than the Vivo V60 Lite 5G's 3270 MBits/s download speed. However, the Vivo device offers the same upload speed of 3270 MBits/s, while the Honor 400 5G has a lower upload speed of 160 MBits/s.

Both phones include NFC, USB Type-C (USB version 2), and fingerprint scanners, but the Honor 400 5G is the only one with an infrared sensor. Both devices come with GPS, a compass, and accelerometer, and support Galileo for navigation. Neither device has a barometer, HDMI output, or 3D facial recognition, and neither includes a stylus or iris scanner. Both phones support motion tracking and optical tracking features, but neither has a built-in projector.

The Honor 400 5G also has a gyroscope, which is shared with the Vivo V60 Lite 5G. Both devices are equipped with a cellular module for connectivity and offer emergency SOS via satellite and crash detection, though neither device features these functions. Overall, the key differences between these two models in connectivity and features lie in the Honor 400 5G's faster download speed, more advanced Wi-Fi support, and additional infrared sensor.

Both the Honor 400 5G and Vivo V60 Lite 5G come with a video light, allowing for better visibility during video recording in low-light environments. Neither phone features sapphire glass display, curved display, or an e-paper display, so there are no differences in these areas.

Overall, the miscellaneous features for both phones are identical, with both offering a video light and lacking the other advanced display technologies such as sapphire glass, curved, or e-paper displays.

In summary, there are no notable differences between the two devices in this category, as both models share the same features in terms of video lighting and display technology.