Honor 400 Lite 8GB RAM VS Honor 400 Smart 5G

The Honor 400 Lite 8GB RAM and Honor 400 Smart 5G differ in several design aspects, including water resistance, weight, and dimensions.

The Honor 400 Lite has no water resistance, while the Honor 400 Smart is water resistant with an IP65 rating. The Lite model weighs 171 g, which is lighter compared to the Smart’s 189 g. In terms of thickness, the Lite is thinner at 7.3 mm, whereas the Smart is slightly thicker at 8.4 mm. Additionally, the Honor 400 Lite has a width of 74.6 mm and a height of 161 mm, while the Smart is a bit wider at 76.8 mm and shorter in height at 166.9 mm. The volume of the Lite is 87.68 cm³, while the Smart has a larger volume at 107.67 cm³.

Both devices lack a rugged build and cannot be folded. The Lite has an IP64 Ingress Protection rating, which is a bit lower than the Smart’s IP65 rating, offering slightly more protection against dust and water for the Smart.

The Honor 400 Lite 8GB RAM and Honor 400 Smart 5G have distinct display specifications, starting with the type of screen. The Lite uses an OLED/AMOLED display, while the Smart features an LCD, IPS screen.

In terms of size, the Lite has a 6.7″ screen, slightly smaller than the 6.77″ display on the Smart. The Lite also offers a higher pixel density of 394 ppi compared to the Smart’s 261 ppi, resulting in a sharper image on the Lite. Additionally, the Lite has a higher resolution of 1080 x 2412 px, while the Smart has a lower resolution of 720 x 1610 px.

Both devices have a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth visuals. The Lite supports an Always-On Display feature, which the Smart does not. Neither product supports HDR10, HDR10+, or Dolby Vision. Both have a touch screen, and neither includes branded damage-resistant glass or a secondary screen.

The Honor 400 Lite 8GB RAM and Honor 400 Smart 5G have similar internal storage and RAM, with both offering 256GB of storage and 8GB of RAM. However, the performance specifications diverge in a few key areas.

The Honor 400 Lite uses a MediaTek Dimensity 7025 chipset with a CPU speed of 2 x 2.5 GHz and 6 x 2 GHz, while the Honor 400 Smart is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 chipset, with a CPU speed of 2 x 2.3 GHz and 6 x 2 GHz. The Lite’s GPU is the IMG BXM-8-256, which runs at a clock speed of 900 MHz, while the Smart features the Adreno 619 GPU with a higher clock speed of 950 MHz. The RAM speed of the Lite is 2750 MHz, notably faster than the Smart’s 2133 MHz.

Other differences include the maximum memory bandwidth, where the Lite supports up to 51.2 GB/s, far surpassing the Smart’s 17 GB/s. The Lite also has four memory channels compared to the Smart’s two. Additionally, the Lite supports a maximum memory amount of 16GB, while the Smart is limited to 8GB. The Lite supports multithreading, whereas the Smart does not. Both devices support 64-bit architecture, use big.LITTLE technology, have integrated LTE, and feature integrated graphics. The Lite supports DDR5 memory, while the Smart uses DDR4 memory.

The Honor 400 Lite 8GB RAM and Honor 400 Smart 5G offer different camera setups, particularly in the main and front cameras. The Lite features a 108 MP main camera paired with a 2 MP secondary lens, while the Smart has a 50 MP main camera and a 2 MP secondary lens. Both devices have similar wide apertures on their main cameras, with the Lite having f/2.2 and f/1.8, while the Smart offers f/2.4 and f/1.8.

For the front camera, the Lite is equipped with a 16 MP sensor and a f/2.5 aperture, while the Smart has a smaller 5 MP front camera with a f/2.2 aperture. Both devices lack a front-facing LED flash but support various advanced features like continuous autofocus for videos, phase-detection autofocus for photos, and manual exposure. Both can shoot 1080p video at 30 fps and support slow-motion video recording, HDR mode, and in-camera panoramas.

Neither device has optical image stabilization, laser autofocus, or 3D photo/video capabilities. Both models lack support for HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and neither can shoot raw images. The Lite supports a front-facing LED flash, but the Smart does not. Both devices have touch autofocus and can create panoramas in-camera.

Both the Honor 400 Lite 8GB RAM and Honor 400 Smart 5G run on Android 15 and offer a similar set of operating system features. These include clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, theme customization, app tracking blocking, and on-device machine learning.

Both devices allow for customizable notifications, support dark mode, and offer battery health checks. They also feature an extra dim mode, full-page screenshots, Live Text, and a media picker. Other shared capabilities include split-screen support, PiP (Picture-in-Picture), and offline voice recognition with voice commands. Both also have the ability to track the current position of the device, are multi-user systems, and support widgets.

Where the two differ, the Honor 400 Lite includes features like focus modes, dynamic theming, and Quick Start, which are not available on the Smart. On the other hand, neither device supports Wi-Fi password sharing, Mail Privacy Protection, or cross-site tracking blocking. Both devices do not receive direct OS updates, and neither can be used as a PC. Other common features between the two are child lock, sharing intents, and the ability to offload apps.

The Honor 400 Lite 8GB RAM and Honor 400 Smart 5G have similar battery features, but they differ in battery capacity. The Lite has a 5230 mAh battery, while the Smart is equipped with a larger 6500 mAh battery.

Both devices support fast charging at 35W and come with a charger in the box. Neither phone offers wireless charging, and both have non-removable, rechargeable batteries. Additionally, both devices feature a battery level indicator to monitor battery status.

Neither phone provides removable batteries, and both support fast charging with the same charging speed of 35W. Both devices also have rechargeable batteries, making them similar in terms of charging functionality and options.

The Honor 400 Lite 8GB RAM and Honor 400 Smart 5G differ significantly in their audio features. The Lite does not have a 3.5 mm audio jack, while the Smart includes a socket for this type of audio connection. Additionally, the Lite does not feature stereo speakers, whereas the Smart does.

The Honor 400 Smart also supports higher-quality wireless audio with aptX, LDAC, and aptX HD, while the Honor 400 Lite lacks support for these codecs. Both devices do not support aptX Adaptive or aptX Lossless, and neither includes a radio function.

In summary, the Honor 400 Smart offers a more robust audio experience with stereo speakers and support for various advanced wireless audio technologies, while the Honor 400 Lite lacks these features.

The Honor 400 Lite 8GB RAM and Honor 400 Smart 5G share many connectivity features but differ in a few key areas. Both models support 5G, offer dual SIM card slots, and include NFC and USB Type-C (USB version 2). They also both support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) for wireless connectivity. Additionally, both phones have fingerprint scanners, GPS, and a compass for navigation.

The main difference lies in their Bluetooth versions. The Lite supports Bluetooth 5.3, while the Smart uses Bluetooth 5.1. The Lite also has a higher download speed of 2770 MBits/s, compared to the Smart’s 2500 MBits/s. Another feature the Lite includes is Galileo support for navigation, which the Smart also has, but there are no significant differences in their GPS capabilities.

Neither phone has an external memory slot, infrared sensor, or HDMI output. Both devices lack features like 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, and motion or optical tracking. They also do not support ANT+ or have a heart rate monitor. Both devices are equipped with accelerometers, cellular modules, and support Wi-Fi and GPS. Overall, the two phones have similar connectivity features, with the Lite offering slightly faster download speeds and Bluetooth 5.3.

Both the Honor 400 Lite 8GB RAM and Honor 400 Smart 5G come equipped with a video light, which can assist with lighting in low-light situations when recording videos. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, making their display technologies identical in this category.

There are no differences between the two products in terms of these miscellaneous features, as both offer the same functionality regarding video lighting and display type.

Overall, in this category, both phones are aligned in terms of features, providing similar capabilities without any notable distinctions.