Honor 400 Lite VS Oppo Reno14 F 5G

The Honor 400 Lite and Oppo Reno14 F 5G differ in several key aspects of their design. Starting with water resistance, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is waterproof with an IP69 rating, while the Honor 400 Lite lacks any water resistance protection, offering no specific rating for this feature.

When it comes to weight, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is slightly heavier at 180 g, compared to the Honor 400 Lite, which weighs 171 g. The dimensions also vary, with the Honor 400 Lite being slightly taller at 161 mm, compared to the Oppo Reno14 F 5G's 158.1 mm. The Oppo device is also marginally wider, measuring 75 mm versus the Honor's 74.6 mm. The thicknesses are close, but the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is a bit thicker at 7.7 mm, while the Honor 400 Lite is 7.3 mm thick.

The volume of the Oppo Reno14 F 5G is also higher at 91.3 cm³, compared to the Honor 400 Lite's 87.7 cm³. Both devices have a similar build in terms of not being rugged, and neither device is foldable. The Honor 400 Lite has an IP64 Ingress Protection rating, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G's IP69 rating provides a higher level of protection against dust and water.

The displays of the Honor 400 Lite and Oppo Reno14 F 5G are similar in some aspects, with both featuring OLED/AMOLED technology and a 120Hz refresh rate. The Honor 400 Lite has a 6.7″ screen, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G’s display is slightly smaller at 6.57″. In terms of pixel density, the Oppo device is marginally higher at 397 ppi compared to the Honor 400 Lite's 394 ppi.

Both displays offer a Full HD+ resolution of 1080 x 2412 px on the Honor and 1080 x 2372 px on the Oppo. Despite these differences, both phones share a similar high-quality resolution for sharp visuals. The Honor 400 Lite stands out with a brightness of 3500 nits, which is significantly higher than the Oppo Reno14 F 5G’s 600 nits.

Other display features are mostly aligned between the two. Both phones support an Always-On Display and feature a touch screen. Neither device supports HDR10 or HDR10+, and neither has a secondary screen. However, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G does come with branded damage-resistant glass, which is not available on the Honor 400 Lite.

In terms of performance, the Honor 400 Lite and Oppo Reno14 F 5G both feature 12GB of RAM, but their other specs differ significantly. The Honor 400 Lite has 256GB of internal storage, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G offers a larger 512GB. Both devices use different chipsets: the Honor 400 Lite is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. The Honor model’s chipset has a CPU with a combination of 2 x 2.5 GHz and 6 x 2.0 GHz cores, while the Oppo's Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 CPU is divided into 4 x 2.2 GHz and 4 x 1.8 GHz cores.

The Geekbench 6 results reflect this difference: the Honor 400 Lite scores 2291 in multi-core and 884 in single-core, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G achieves 2748 in multi-core and 943 in single-core, indicating a slightly stronger performance from the Oppo. The Honor 400 Lite’s GPU is the IMG BXM-8-256, clocked at 900 MHz, whereas the Oppo Reno14 F 5G uses the Adreno 710, which runs at 800 MHz.

Regarding other specifications, both devices feature integrated LTE, integrated graphics, and support for 64-bit processing. The Honor 400 Lite’s semiconductor is built on a 6 nm process, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a smaller 4 nm semiconductor. The Honor phone supports a higher memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s compared to the Oppo’s 22 GB/s. The Honor device also supports more memory channels (4 vs 2) and can handle up to 16GB of memory, while the Oppo is limited to 12GB. Both phones support DDR5 memory, DirectX 12, OpenCL 2, big.LITTLE architecture, and HMP (Heterogeneous Multi-Processing), and both have 18 and 128 shading units, respectively, in their GPUs.

The Honor 400 Lite and Oppo Reno14 F 5G differ significantly in their camera setups. The Honor 400 Lite features a dual-lens main camera with 108 MP and 2 MP sensors, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a triple-lens main camera with 50 MP, 8 MP, and 2 MP sensors. Both have wide apertures on their main cameras, with the Honor offering 2.2f and 1.8f, and the Oppo providing 1.8f, 2.2f, and 2.4f apertures for its lenses.

For the front camera, the Honor 400 Lite has a 16 MP sensor with a wide aperture of 2.5f, whereas the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a higher-resolution 32 MP front camera with a 2f aperture. Both devices lack a front-facing LED flash, though both have a main camera flash with one LED. Additionally, neither phone features a dual-lens front camera.

Both phones support similar camera features, including continuous autofocus, phase-detection autofocus for photos, slow-motion video recording, and the ability to create panoramas in-camera. They also share features like manual exposure, touch autofocus, manual ISO, and timelapse function. The Honor 400 Lite records video at 1080p at 30 fps, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G can record at 4K (2160p) at 30 fps. Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording. Both devices also lack laser autofocus, a front-facing camera under the display, and 3D photo/video recording capabilities.

The Honor 400 Lite and Oppo Reno14 F 5G both run on Android 15 and share many features in their operating systems. Both phones offer clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy options, and support for theme customization. Additionally, both devices can block app tracking, feature on-device machine learning, and allow for customizable notifications. They also support dark mode, battery health checks, and an extra dim mode, among other features.

There are some notable similarities as well, such as support for full-page screenshots, split screen, PiP (Picture in Picture), and offline voice recognition. Both phones also have a multi-user system, voice commands, and the ability to track the device's current position. Features like dynamic theming, media picker, and Live Text are available on both devices, and they both have a child lock, widgets support, and the ability to offload apps.

However, there are a few minor differences. Both devices lack Wi-Fi password sharing, focus modes, and Quick Start. Neither device receives direct OS updates. The Oppo Reno14 F 5G has no additional features listed that the Honor 400 Lite does not include, and vice versa. Both operating systems offer a similar suite of privacy, customization, and productivity features.

The Honor 400 Lite and Oppo Reno14 F 5G both feature non-removable rechargeable batteries, but they differ in battery size and charging capabilities. The Honor 400 Lite is equipped with a 5230 mAh battery, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a larger 6000 mAh battery. Both devices support fast charging, but the Oppo Reno14 F 5G has a faster charging speed of 45W, compared to the 35W charging speed of the Honor 400 Lite.

Neither phone supports wireless charging. Both devices also include a battery level indicator and feature rechargeable batteries, ensuring users can monitor and maintain their battery life effectively. Overall, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G offers a larger battery and slightly faster charging, but both phones provide similar fundamental battery management features.

The Honor 400 Lite and Oppo Reno14 F 5G differ in their audio features. Neither device has a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to rely on wireless or USB-C audio options. The Honor 400 Lite lacks stereo speakers, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G does feature stereo speakers for enhanced audio output.

In terms of wireless audio technology, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G supports aptX and aptX HD, offering better audio quality over Bluetooth. The Honor 400 Lite does not support any aptX technologies. Neither device supports LDAC, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless, which would offer additional high-quality wireless audio options.

Overall, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G provides a more robust audio experience with stereo speakers and advanced aptX support, while the Honor 400 Lite has more basic audio features with no support for high-quality Bluetooth audio codecs.

Both the Honor 400 Lite and Oppo Reno14 F 5G offer 5G support and share similar connectivity features, such as support for Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac). They both also feature dual SIM support, USB Type-C ports (USB version 2), and NFC capabilities. However, the Oppo Reno14 F 5G supports slightly faster download speeds, with a rate of 2900 MBits/s compared to the Honor 400 Lite's 2770 MBits/s.

In terms of Bluetooth, the Honor 400 Lite is equipped with Bluetooth version 5.3, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G uses Bluetooth version 5.1. Both phones include a fingerprint scanner for biometric security and have GPS and a compass for navigation. The Honor 400 Lite has a gyroscope, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G also includes a gyroscope and supports motion tracking, though neither device has optical tracking or a barometer.

Other notable differences include the Honor 400 Lite's lack of an external memory slot, while the Oppo Reno14 F 5G does include one. Both phones have an accelerometer and support Galileo, but neither device features an infrared sensor, HDMI output, or any advanced facial recognition or iris scanning capabilities. Both devices lack a built-in projector and do not support emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, or DLNA certification.

Both the Honor 400 Lite and Oppo Reno14 F 5G are equipped with a video light, which can assist in low-light video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass display, curved displays, or e-paper displays, meaning both phones use standard glass displays without the specialized features these would provide.

In terms of miscellaneous features, the two devices are very similar, with no significant differences between them in this category. Both phones offer basic display and lighting features, focusing more on standard usage rather than advanced display technology.

Overall, the Honor 400 Lite and Oppo Reno14 F 5G match closely in this group, both lacking some of the more advanced display options found in other devices but providing essential features like a video light for video recording.