Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) VS Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro feature waterproof designs with an Ingress Protection (IP) rating of IP68, meaning they are both resistant to dust and can withstand submersion in water up to a certain depth.

In terms of weight, the Honor 400 Pro 5G is slightly lighter at 204 g compared to the Poco F7 Pro's 206 g, which is a minor difference. The thickness of the Honor device is also thinner at 7.8 mm, while the Poco F7 Pro is 8.1 mm thick, giving it a marginally bulkier profile.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a width of 74.7 mm and a height of 156.3 mm, with a total volume of 91.07 cm³. In comparison, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit larger with a width of 75 mm, a height of 160.3 mm, and a volume of 97.38 cm³. Both devices have no rugged build and cannot be folded.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro feature OLED/AMOLED displays, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The screen size of the Honor 400 Pro is 6.55″, slightly smaller than the Poco F7 Pro's 6.67″ screen. This results in the Poco F7 Pro offering a slightly larger viewing area.

In terms of pixel density, the Poco F7 Pro surpasses the Honor 400 Pro, with a higher value of 526 ppi compared to the Honor's 460 ppi, meaning the Poco F7 Pro's display is sharper. The resolution of the Poco F7 Pro is also higher at 1440 x 3200 px, compared to the Honor's 1264 x 2736 px.

Both devices support a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth scrolling and animations, and they share features like Always-On Display. However, the Poco F7 Pro also has additional display features, including branded damage-resistant glass, support for HDR10, HDR10+, and Dolby Vision, which the Honor 400 Pro lacks. Both phones do not have a secondary screen and both support touch input.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro are equipped with the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset and Adreno 750 GPU, ensuring strong performance in gaming and multitasking. Both devices have a CPU configuration of 3 x 3.15 GHz, 2 x 2.96 GHz, 2 x 2.26 GHz, and 1 x 3.3 GHz, with 8 CPU threads and support for big.LITTLE technology. They also both feature the same GPU clock speed of 900 MHz and the same maximum memory bandwidth of 76.6 GB/s.

When it comes to memory, the Honor 400 Pro 5G offers 1024GB of internal storage, which is double the 512GB available in the Poco F7 Pro. However, both devices share the same 12GB of RAM, with RAM speed set at 4800 MHz. Both devices also use the same DDR5 memory version, have the same L2 and L3 cache sizes, and support the same multithreading capabilities.

Both phones perform identically in Geekbench 6 benchmarking, with scores of 7325 in multi-core and 2213 in single-core tests. They also share the same thermal design power (TDP) of 12.5W and the same semiconductor size of 4 nm. The Poco F7 Pro includes the same features as the Honor 400 Pro 5G in terms of GPU execution units (3), OpenGL, OpenCL versions, and integrated LTE. There are no major differences in performance specs beyond storage capacity.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro both feature multi-lens main cameras, but with significant differences in their configurations. The Honor 400 Pro offers a 200 MP, 50 MP, and 12 MP setup, while the Poco F7 Pro has a 50 MP and 8 MP combination for its main camera. The Honor device supports optical zoom with a 3x magnification, whereas the Poco F7 Pro lacks optical zoom capability, with a 0x zoom rating.

For the front camera, the Honor 400 Pro has a 50 MP sensor, while the Poco F7 Pro features a 20 MP front camera. Both devices include features like built-in optical image stabilization, phase-detection autofocus, manual exposure, and manual ISO. They also both support slow-motion video recording, touch autofocus, and in-camera panorama creation. However, the Honor 400 Pro supports a wider range of manual settings, including manual white balance and manual focus.

Both phones share other common features, including the ability to shoot timelapse videos, the lack of a front-facing LED flash, and the absence of 360° panorama shooting. The Honor 400 Pro, however, does not have a dual-tone LED flash, unlike the Poco F7 Pro, which includes two flash LEDs. Neither device supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision video recording, nor do they offer advanced features like 3D photo/video recording capabilities or a front-facing camera under the display.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro run on Android 15, with identical features in terms of clipboard warnings, location privacy options, camera/microphone privacy settings, and theme customization. Both devices support app tracking blocking, have on-device machine learning, customizable notifications, media picker, dark mode, and Wi-Fi password sharing, though neither has Wi-Fi password sharing enabled.

Both phones feature PiP (Picture-in-Picture), split screen support, full-page screenshots, and the ability to play games while they download. They also both have offline voice recognition, voice commands, and track the device's current position. Other shared features include child lock, dynamic theming, live text, sharing intents, multi-user systems, and support for widgets.

There are a few features missing from both devices, including the Quick Start function. Neither device supports focus modes, and neither gets direct OS updates. However, both are free and open source, making them flexible for developers and advanced users.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro differ in their battery capacities. The Honor 400 Pro has a larger 7200 mAh battery, while the Poco F7 Pro comes with a 6000 mAh battery. Despite this difference in size, both devices support fast charging at 90W, offering similar charging speeds. The Honor 400 Pro also supports wireless charging, which is not available on the Poco F7 Pro.

Both phones feature rechargeable, non-removable batteries and include a battery level indicator. They also share the ability to support fast charging, ensuring that both devices can be quickly powered up when needed.

In summary, while both phones have similar charging capabilities, the Honor 400 Pro offers an advantage with its wireless charging support and larger battery capacity, while the Poco F7 Pro lacks wireless charging support.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro come with stereo speakers, providing enhanced audio quality. Neither device has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, meaning users will need to rely on Bluetooth or USB-C for wired audio options.

The Honor 400 Pro supports aptX HD, but lacks other advanced audio technologies like aptX, LDAC, and aptX Adaptive, which are all available on the Poco F7 Pro. The Poco F7 Pro also supports LDAC, aptX, aptX HD, and aptX Adaptive, providing a more comprehensive set of audio features for wireless audio enthusiasts.

Neither phone has a radio or aptX Lossless support, so both devices are limited in terms of radio listening and lossless wireless audio streaming.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro offer 5G support, dual SIM card slots, and NFC, making them suitable for fast mobile data and wireless payments. They also share Wi-Fi capabilities, supporting Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 6, and Wi-Fi 7, though the Poco F7 Pro adds Wi-Fi 6E support, which is not available on the Honor 400 Pro.

Both phones come with Bluetooth 5.4, USB Type-C ports with USB 2.0, and similar download (10000 MBit/s) and upload (3500 MBit/s) speeds. They also feature a fingerprint scanner, GPS, a gyroscope, a compass, infrared sensors, accelerometers, and cellular modules, all of which provide a robust set of connectivity and sensor options. Neither device supports motion or optical tracking, and both lack features like 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, or a built-in projector.

The Honor 400 Pro includes Galileo support, while the Poco F7 Pro does not mention it. Neither phone offers a barometer or HDMI output, and both lack emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, and DLNA certification. They are otherwise quite similar in terms of connectivity and features.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G (China) and the Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro come equipped with a video light, making them suitable for improving video quality in low-light conditions. Neither device features sapphire glass displays, curved displays, or e-paper displays, so they share the same design elements in this regard.

In summary, the two devices are identical in the miscellaneous features they offer, with both having a video light but lacking the more premium or specialized display technologies like sapphire glass, curved screens, or e-paper displays.