Honor 400 Pro 5G VS Motorola Edge 60 Pro

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro are waterproof, with an IP68 rating, ensuring they can withstand water submersion. The Honor 400 Pro 5G weighs 205 g, which is slightly heavier than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 186 g. This weight difference could affect handling comfort for some users.

In terms of dimensions, the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a thickness of 8.1 mm, which is marginally thinner than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro’s 8.2 mm. The Honor phone also has a width of 76.1 mm and a height of 156.5 mm, while the Motorola model is a bit more compact, with a width of 73.1 mm and a height of 160.7 mm. Despite these slight variations in size, both phones are similar in overall volume, with the Honor 400 Pro 5G measuring 96.47 cm³ and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro measuring 96.33 cm³, making them almost identical in this regard.

Neither phone features a rugged build, and both are not foldable, so there are no additional design considerations in that area. Overall, the differences in design are quite minimal, with the Honor 400 Pro 5G being a bit thicker and heavier, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is slightly more compact.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro feature a 6.7″ OLED/AMOLED display, ensuring vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a pixel density of 460 ppi, which is slightly higher than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 444 ppi, indicating that the Honor device has a slightly sharper display.

In terms of resolution, the Honor 400 Pro 5G offers 1280 x 2800 px, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a resolution of 1220 x 2712 px. The Honor phone has a higher pixel count, which may contribute to a slightly more detailed image, though the difference in resolution is relatively minor.

Both phones support a 120Hz refresh rate, providing smooth scrolling and gameplay experiences. The Honor 400 Pro 5G has a typical brightness of 5000 nits, which is higher than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 4500 nits, suggesting that the Honor model might perform slightly better in bright outdoor conditions. Additionally, the Motorola device includes branded damage-resistant glass and supports HDR10 and HDR10+, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G lacks these features. Neither device supports Dolby Vision, and both have a touchscreen but no secondary screen.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro come with 512GB of internal storage and 12GB of RAM, providing ample space and multitasking power. The Honor 400 Pro 5G is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro uses the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 chipset. These different chipsets lead to notable performance differences, with the Honor 400 Pro 5G achieving a higher AnTuTu benchmark score of 2,010,000 compared to the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 1,375,600.

The Honor device also leads in CPU performance, with a higher clock speed across more cores. The Honor 400 Pro 5G's CPU features a combination of 3 x 3.15 GHz, 2 x 2.96 GHz, 2 x 2.26 GHz, and 1 x 3.3 GHz, whereas the Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a CPU with 1 x 3.35 GHz, 3 x 3.2 GHz, and 4 x 2.2 GHz. In Geekbench 6 results, the Honor 400 Pro 5G also shows a significant advantage with a multi-core score of 7,325 and a single-core score of 2,213, compared to the Motorola’s 4,700 and 1,536, respectively.

The GPU in the Honor 400 Pro 5G is the Adreno 750, with a clock speed of 900 MHz, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro uses the Mali G615 MC6 with a higher clock speed of 1,400 MHz. However, despite the higher clock speed, the Honor's Adreno GPU may outperform in other factors not fully captured by the clock speed alone. The Honor 400 Pro 5G also offers higher memory bandwidth (76.6 GB/s) compared to the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 68.2 GB/s. Additionally, the Honor phone uses 2 memory channels, whereas the Motorola phone uses 4, which may offer a slight edge in memory handling. Both phones support 64-bit processing, DirectX 12, HMP, and TrustZone, and both have integrated graphics.

The Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro both feature multi-lens main cameras, with the Honor offering a combination of 200 MP, 50 MP, and 12 MP lenses, while the Motorola sports 50 MP, 50 MP, and 10 MP lenses. The wide apertures of the Honor's lenses are 1.9, 2.4, and 2.2f, whereas the Motorola's are 1.8, 2, and 2f, with both phones capable of 3x optical zoom.

On the front, the Honor 400 Pro 5G has a dual-lens front camera setup with a 50 MP primary sensor and a 2 MP secondary sensor, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a single 50 MP front camera. Both phones come with a built-in optical image stabilization system and support features like phase-detection autofocus, manual ISO, continuous autofocus during video recording, slow-motion recording, and HDR mode. They both also support features like timelapse, manual exposure, and in-camera panorama creation.

Neither phone supports HDR10 or Dolby Vision recording, and both lack a front-facing LED flash. Other features such as laser autofocus, front-facing camera under the display, RGB LED flash, and 3D photo/video recording capabilities are also absent on both devices. Overall, while the two phones offer similar camera features, the Honor 400 Pro 5G stands out with a more advanced multi-lens main camera setup and a dual-lens front camera, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro opts for a simpler front camera setup.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro run on Android 15 and share a variety of privacy and customization features. Both devices support clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy options. They also have theme customization, the ability to block app tracking, on-device machine learning, notification permissions, media picker, and the option to play games while downloading. Additionally, both phones have dark mode, battery health check, extra dim mode, dynamic theming, and the ability to offload apps.

The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has an added feature not found in the Honor 400 Pro 5G: it can be used as a PC. This gives it an advantage in terms of versatility for users who may want to use their phone as a desktop-like experience. Other than that, both phones support PiP (Picture-in-Picture), Live Text, full-page screenshots, split screen, and have customizable notifications. They also both include a child lock, support widgets, are free and open source, and have offline voice recognition and voice commands.

Neither phone gets direct OS updates, and neither has Quick Start. Both phones also track the current position of a mobile device and support a multi-user system. One key difference is that while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro supports the use of a PC, the Honor 400 Pro 5G does not offer this functionality. Aside from that, the software experience on both devices is largely identical.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro come equipped with a 6000 mAh battery, ensuring long-lasting power. The Honor 400 Pro 5G supports faster charging with a 100W charging speed, compared to the Motorola Edge 60 Pro’s 90W charging speed. The Honor device also offers a higher wireless charging speed of 50W, while the Motorola's wireless charging speed is 15W.

Another key difference is that the Honor 400 Pro 5G supports reverse wireless charging, allowing it to charge other devices, a feature that the Motorola Edge 60 Pro does not offer. Both phones include a charger in the box, have rechargeable batteries, and feature a battery level indicator. Neither device has a removable battery, and both support wireless charging and fast charging.

In terms of battery features, both phones are similar overall, but the Honor 400 Pro 5G stands out with its faster charging speeds and reverse wireless charging capability.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro lack a 3.5 mm audio jack, so users will need to use wireless or USB-C headphones. Both phones feature stereo speakers, ensuring a richer sound experience. However, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro supports aptX Adaptive, which provides enhanced Bluetooth audio quality, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G does not include this feature. Neither phone includes a radio for FM or other broadcast signals.

Overall, the audio experience is quite similar in terms of speaker quality, but the Motorola device offers a slight advantage with its support for aptX Adaptive for improved Bluetooth audio performance.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro offer 5G support and feature NFC, USB Type-C (USB version 2), and fingerprint scanners. The Honor 400 Pro 5G supports a wider range of Wi-Fi versions, including Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), and Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro supports only Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax). The Honor device also uses two SIM cards (dual SIM), while the Motorola uses one SIM and one eSIM.

Both phones do not have an external memory slot, emergency SOS via satellite, or crash detection. The Honor 400 Pro 5G includes an infrared sensor, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro does not. Both phones include standard features like GPS, a compass, an accelerometer, and a cellular module. The Honor 400 Pro 5G lacks a gyroscope, while the Motorola device includes this sensor.

Additionally, both phones support Galileo, but neither has a barometer, HDMI output, 3D facial recognition, an iris scanner, or a stylus. Neither device includes motion or optical tracking, or a built-in projector. Overall, the connectivity and feature sets are quite similar, with the Honor offering slightly more Wi-Fi support options and an infrared sensor, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro adds a gyroscope for more precise motion sensing.

Both the Honor 400 Pro 5G and the Motorola Edge 60 Pro come with a video light, which helps improve the lighting during video recording. Neither device features sapphire glass for additional screen protection, nor do they have an e-paper display. The Honor 400 Pro 5G does not have a curved display, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a curved display, offering a different aesthetic and feel in hand.

In summary, the primary difference between the two is the Motorola’s inclusion of a curved display, while the Honor 400 Pro 5G maintains a flat design. Both phones offer similar functionality in terms of video light and display protection.